从时间轴回访数据中标准化饮酒结果的系统方法。

IF 2 Q3 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Christina Marini, Nicole S Northover, Noah D Gold, Ursula K Rogers, Kelley C O'Donnell, Babak Tofighi, Stephen Ross, Michael P Bogenschutz
{"title":"从时间轴回访数据中标准化饮酒结果的系统方法。","authors":"Christina Marini,&nbsp;Nicole S Northover,&nbsp;Noah D Gold,&nbsp;Ursula K Rogers,&nbsp;Kelley C O'Donnell,&nbsp;Babak Tofighi,&nbsp;Stephen Ross,&nbsp;Michael P Bogenschutz","doi":"10.1177/11782218231157558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The timeline followback (TLFB) interview is the gold standard for the quantitative assessment of alcohol use. However, self-reported \"drinks\" can vary in alcohol content. If this variability is not accounted for, it can compromise the reliability and validity of TLFB data. To improve the precision of the TLFB data, we developed a detailed standard operating procedure (SOP) to calculate standard drinks more accurately from participant reports.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>For the new SOP, the volume and alcohol content by volume (ABV) of distinct types of alcoholic beverages were determined based on product websites and other reliable sources. Recipes for specific cocktails were constructed based on recipes from bartending education websites. One standard drink was defined as 0.6 oz (14 g) of absolute alcohol. Standard drink totals were contrasted for the new SOP approach and the standard procedure, which generally assumed that one self-reported drink was equivalent to one standard drink.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Relative to the standard TLFB procedure, higher numbers of standard drinks were reported after implementing the TLFB SOP.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Variability in procedures for conversion of self-reported alcohol consumption to standard drinks can confound the interpretation of TLFB data. The use and reporting of a detailed SOP can significantly reduce the potential for such inconsistencies. Detailed and consistent procedures for calculation of standard drinks can enhance the quality of TLFB drinking data.</p>","PeriodicalId":22185,"journal":{"name":"Substance Abuse: Research and Treatment","volume":"17 ","pages":"11782218231157558"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/61/71/10.1177_11782218231157558.PMC10009017.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Systematic Approach to Standardizing Drinking Outcomes From Timeline Followback Data.\",\"authors\":\"Christina Marini,&nbsp;Nicole S Northover,&nbsp;Noah D Gold,&nbsp;Ursula K Rogers,&nbsp;Kelley C O'Donnell,&nbsp;Babak Tofighi,&nbsp;Stephen Ross,&nbsp;Michael P Bogenschutz\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/11782218231157558\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The timeline followback (TLFB) interview is the gold standard for the quantitative assessment of alcohol use. However, self-reported \\\"drinks\\\" can vary in alcohol content. If this variability is not accounted for, it can compromise the reliability and validity of TLFB data. To improve the precision of the TLFB data, we developed a detailed standard operating procedure (SOP) to calculate standard drinks more accurately from participant reports.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>For the new SOP, the volume and alcohol content by volume (ABV) of distinct types of alcoholic beverages were determined based on product websites and other reliable sources. Recipes for specific cocktails were constructed based on recipes from bartending education websites. One standard drink was defined as 0.6 oz (14 g) of absolute alcohol. Standard drink totals were contrasted for the new SOP approach and the standard procedure, which generally assumed that one self-reported drink was equivalent to one standard drink.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Relative to the standard TLFB procedure, higher numbers of standard drinks were reported after implementing the TLFB SOP.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Variability in procedures for conversion of self-reported alcohol consumption to standard drinks can confound the interpretation of TLFB data. The use and reporting of a detailed SOP can significantly reduce the potential for such inconsistencies. Detailed and consistent procedures for calculation of standard drinks can enhance the quality of TLFB drinking data.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22185,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Substance Abuse: Research and Treatment\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"11782218231157558\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/61/71/10.1177_11782218231157558.PMC10009017.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Substance Abuse: Research and Treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/11782218231157558\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance Abuse: Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11782218231157558","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:时间轴回访(TLFB)访谈是定量评估酒精使用的金标准。然而,自我报告的“饮酒”在酒精含量上可能有所不同。如果不考虑这种可变性,它可能会损害TLFB数据的可靠性和有效性。为了提高TLFB数据的精度,我们制定了详细的标准操作程序(SOP),以便从参与者报告中更准确地计算标准饮料。方法:根据产品网站和其他可靠来源,对不同类型酒精饮料的体积和体积酒精含量(ABV)进行测定。特定鸡尾酒的配方是根据调酒教育网站上的配方构建的。一份标准饮料被定义为0.6盎司(14克)无水酒精。标准饮料总量对比了新的SOP方法和标准程序,通常假设一个自我报告的饮料相当于一个标准饮料。结果:与标准TLFB程序相比,实施TLFB SOP后报告的标准饮料数量增加。结论:将自我报告的饮酒量转换为标准饮酒量的程序的可变性可能会混淆对TLFB数据的解释。详细SOP的使用和报告可以显著减少这种不一致的可能性。详细和一致的标准饮料计算程序可以提高TLFB饮用数据的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A Systematic Approach to Standardizing Drinking Outcomes From Timeline Followback Data.

A Systematic Approach to Standardizing Drinking Outcomes From Timeline Followback Data.

A Systematic Approach to Standardizing Drinking Outcomes From Timeline Followback Data.

Objective: The timeline followback (TLFB) interview is the gold standard for the quantitative assessment of alcohol use. However, self-reported "drinks" can vary in alcohol content. If this variability is not accounted for, it can compromise the reliability and validity of TLFB data. To improve the precision of the TLFB data, we developed a detailed standard operating procedure (SOP) to calculate standard drinks more accurately from participant reports.

Method: For the new SOP, the volume and alcohol content by volume (ABV) of distinct types of alcoholic beverages were determined based on product websites and other reliable sources. Recipes for specific cocktails were constructed based on recipes from bartending education websites. One standard drink was defined as 0.6 oz (14 g) of absolute alcohol. Standard drink totals were contrasted for the new SOP approach and the standard procedure, which generally assumed that one self-reported drink was equivalent to one standard drink.

Results: Relative to the standard TLFB procedure, higher numbers of standard drinks were reported after implementing the TLFB SOP.

Conclusions: Variability in procedures for conversion of self-reported alcohol consumption to standard drinks can confound the interpretation of TLFB data. The use and reporting of a detailed SOP can significantly reduce the potential for such inconsistencies. Detailed and consistent procedures for calculation of standard drinks can enhance the quality of TLFB drinking data.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
50
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信