国家限制接触政策期间限制接触基本生命支持训练对学习效果的影响。

IF 1.5 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Suhattaya Boonmak, Polpun Boonmak
{"title":"国家限制接触政策期间限制接触基本生命支持训练对学习效果的影响。","authors":"Suhattaya Boonmak,&nbsp;Polpun Boonmak","doi":"10.2147/OAEM.S411096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Basic life support (BLS) training aimed at building knowledge and skills in cardiopulmonary resuscitation. During training, there is the possibility of airborne COVID-19 transmission. The aim was to evaluate students' knowledge, skills, and course satisfaction following contact-restricted BLS training under the contact restriction policy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From July 2020 to January 2021, a prospective, descriptive study was conducted among fifth-year dental students. Contact-restricted BLS training consisted of online learning, online pre-testing, non-contact training with automated real-time feedback manikins, and remote monitoring. The participants' skills, knowledge through online testing, and course satisfaction were all evaluated after training. At three months and six months after training, their knowledge was re-evaluated through online testing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-five participants were included in this study. Their mean (SD) knowledge scores after training, at three and six months, were 81.5 (10.8)%, 71.1 (16.4)%, and 65.8 (14.5)%, respectively. The percentage of participants, who passed the skills test on their first, second, and third attempts had been 83.6%, 94.5%, and 100%, respectively. The mean (SD) satisfaction score with the course was 4.87 (0.34) on a five-point Likert score. After training, no participants had COVID-19 infection.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Training in contact-restricted BLS had produced acceptable knowledge, skills, and satisfaction results. Knowledge tests, competence tests, and course satisfaction were comparable to conventional pre-pandemic trainings with similar participants. Due to the significant dangers of aerosol disease transmission, it became a viable training alternative.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>TCTR20210503001 (Thai Clinical Trials Registry).</p>","PeriodicalId":45096,"journal":{"name":"Open Access Emergency Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/9f/13/oaem-15-157.PMC10182788.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Contact-Restricted Basic Life Support Training During the Nation's Contact Restriction Policy on Learning Outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Suhattaya Boonmak,&nbsp;Polpun Boonmak\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/OAEM.S411096\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Basic life support (BLS) training aimed at building knowledge and skills in cardiopulmonary resuscitation. During training, there is the possibility of airborne COVID-19 transmission. The aim was to evaluate students' knowledge, skills, and course satisfaction following contact-restricted BLS training under the contact restriction policy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From July 2020 to January 2021, a prospective, descriptive study was conducted among fifth-year dental students. Contact-restricted BLS training consisted of online learning, online pre-testing, non-contact training with automated real-time feedback manikins, and remote monitoring. The participants' skills, knowledge through online testing, and course satisfaction were all evaluated after training. At three months and six months after training, their knowledge was re-evaluated through online testing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-five participants were included in this study. Their mean (SD) knowledge scores after training, at three and six months, were 81.5 (10.8)%, 71.1 (16.4)%, and 65.8 (14.5)%, respectively. The percentage of participants, who passed the skills test on their first, second, and third attempts had been 83.6%, 94.5%, and 100%, respectively. The mean (SD) satisfaction score with the course was 4.87 (0.34) on a five-point Likert score. After training, no participants had COVID-19 infection.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Training in contact-restricted BLS had produced acceptable knowledge, skills, and satisfaction results. Knowledge tests, competence tests, and course satisfaction were comparable to conventional pre-pandemic trainings with similar participants. Due to the significant dangers of aerosol disease transmission, it became a viable training alternative.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>TCTR20210503001 (Thai Clinical Trials Registry).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Access Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/9f/13/oaem-15-157.PMC10182788.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Access Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/OAEM.S411096\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Access Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OAEM.S411096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:开展基础生命支持(BLS)培训,培养心肺复苏知识和技能。在训练期间,COVID-19有可能通过空气传播。目的是评估学生在接触限制政策下的接触限制劳工统计局培训后的知识、技能和课程满意度。方法:从2020年7月到2021年1月,对五年级牙科学生进行前瞻性描述性研究。非接触式劳工统计局培训包括在线学习、在线预测试、非接触式自动化实时反馈模型培训和远程监控。培训结束后,对参与者的技能、在线测试知识和课程满意度进行了评估。在培训后3个月和6个月,通过在线测试对他们的知识进行重新评估。结果:本研究共纳入55名受试者。训练后3个月和6个月的平均(SD)知识得分分别为81.5(10.8)%、71.1(16.4)%和65.8(14.5)%。参与者在第一次、第二次和第三次尝试中通过技能测试的比例分别为83.6%、94.5%和100%。该课程的平均(SD)满意度评分为4.87(0.34),李克特评分为5分。培训后,没有参与者感染COVID-19。结论:接触受限劳工统计局培训产生了可接受的知识、技能和满意度结果。知识测试、能力测试和课程满意度与具有类似参与者的传统大流行前培训相当。由于气溶胶传播疾病的重大危险,它成为一种可行的培训替代方案。试验注册:TCTR20210503001(泰国临床试验注册中心)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Effect of Contact-Restricted Basic Life Support Training During the Nation's Contact Restriction Policy on Learning Outcomes.

Effect of Contact-Restricted Basic Life Support Training During the Nation's Contact Restriction Policy on Learning Outcomes.

Effect of Contact-Restricted Basic Life Support Training During the Nation's Contact Restriction Policy on Learning Outcomes.

Objective: Basic life support (BLS) training aimed at building knowledge and skills in cardiopulmonary resuscitation. During training, there is the possibility of airborne COVID-19 transmission. The aim was to evaluate students' knowledge, skills, and course satisfaction following contact-restricted BLS training under the contact restriction policy.

Methods: From July 2020 to January 2021, a prospective, descriptive study was conducted among fifth-year dental students. Contact-restricted BLS training consisted of online learning, online pre-testing, non-contact training with automated real-time feedback manikins, and remote monitoring. The participants' skills, knowledge through online testing, and course satisfaction were all evaluated after training. At three months and six months after training, their knowledge was re-evaluated through online testing.

Results: Fifty-five participants were included in this study. Their mean (SD) knowledge scores after training, at three and six months, were 81.5 (10.8)%, 71.1 (16.4)%, and 65.8 (14.5)%, respectively. The percentage of participants, who passed the skills test on their first, second, and third attempts had been 83.6%, 94.5%, and 100%, respectively. The mean (SD) satisfaction score with the course was 4.87 (0.34) on a five-point Likert score. After training, no participants had COVID-19 infection.

Conclusion: Training in contact-restricted BLS had produced acceptable knowledge, skills, and satisfaction results. Knowledge tests, competence tests, and course satisfaction were comparable to conventional pre-pandemic trainings with similar participants. Due to the significant dangers of aerosol disease transmission, it became a viable training alternative.

Trial registration: TCTR20210503001 (Thai Clinical Trials Registry).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Open Access Emergency Medicine
Open Access Emergency Medicine EMERGENCY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
85
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信