基于深度卷积神经网络的CT降噪的对比度和噪声相关空间分辨率测量。

Zhongxing Zhou, Hao Gong, Scott Hsieh, Cynthia H McCollough, Lifeng Yu
{"title":"基于深度卷积神经网络的CT降噪的对比度和噪声相关空间分辨率测量。","authors":"Zhongxing Zhou,&nbsp;Hao Gong,&nbsp;Scott Hsieh,&nbsp;Cynthia H McCollough,&nbsp;Lifeng Yu","doi":"10.1117/12.2654972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Deep convolutional neural network (DCNN)-based noise reduction methods have been increasingly deployed in clinical CT. Accurate assessment of their spatial resolution properties is required. Spatial resolution is typically measured on physical phantoms, which may not represent the true performance of DCNN in patients as it is typically trained and tested with patient images and the generalizability of DNN to physical phantoms is questionable. In this work, we proposed a patient-data-based framework to measure the spatial resolution of DCNN methods, which involves lesion- and noise-insertion in projection domain, lesion ensemble averaging, and modulation transfer function measurement using an oversampled edge spread function from the cylindrical lesion signal. The impact of varying lesion contrast, dose levels, and CNN denoising strengths were investigated for a ResNet-based DCNN model trained using patient images. The spatial resolution degradation of DCNN reconstructions becomes more severe as the contrast or radiation dose decreased, or DCNN denoising strength increased. The measured 50%/10% MTF spatial frequencies of DCNN with highest denoising strength were (-500 HU:0.36/0.72 mm<sup>-1</sup>; -100 HU:0.32/0.65 mm<sup>-1</sup>; -50 HU:0.27/0.53 mm<sup>-1</sup>; -20 HU:0.18/0.36 mm<sup>-1</sup>; -10 HU:0.15/0.30 mm<sup>-1</sup>), while the 50%/10% MTF values of FBP were almost kept constant of 0.38/0.76 mm<sup>-1</sup>.</p>","PeriodicalId":74505,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering","volume":"12463 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10187613/pdf/nihms-1874870.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contrast- and noise-dependent spatial resolution measurement for deep convolutional neural network-based noise reduction in CT using patient data.\",\"authors\":\"Zhongxing Zhou,&nbsp;Hao Gong,&nbsp;Scott Hsieh,&nbsp;Cynthia H McCollough,&nbsp;Lifeng Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.1117/12.2654972\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Deep convolutional neural network (DCNN)-based noise reduction methods have been increasingly deployed in clinical CT. Accurate assessment of their spatial resolution properties is required. Spatial resolution is typically measured on physical phantoms, which may not represent the true performance of DCNN in patients as it is typically trained and tested with patient images and the generalizability of DNN to physical phantoms is questionable. In this work, we proposed a patient-data-based framework to measure the spatial resolution of DCNN methods, which involves lesion- and noise-insertion in projection domain, lesion ensemble averaging, and modulation transfer function measurement using an oversampled edge spread function from the cylindrical lesion signal. The impact of varying lesion contrast, dose levels, and CNN denoising strengths were investigated for a ResNet-based DCNN model trained using patient images. The spatial resolution degradation of DCNN reconstructions becomes more severe as the contrast or radiation dose decreased, or DCNN denoising strength increased. The measured 50%/10% MTF spatial frequencies of DCNN with highest denoising strength were (-500 HU:0.36/0.72 mm<sup>-1</sup>; -100 HU:0.32/0.65 mm<sup>-1</sup>; -50 HU:0.27/0.53 mm<sup>-1</sup>; -20 HU:0.18/0.36 mm<sup>-1</sup>; -10 HU:0.15/0.30 mm<sup>-1</sup>), while the 50%/10% MTF values of FBP were almost kept constant of 0.38/0.76 mm<sup>-1</sup>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering\",\"volume\":\"12463 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10187613/pdf/nihms-1874870.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2654972\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2654972","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于深度卷积神经网络(DCNN)的降噪方法已越来越多地应用于临床CT。需要对它们的空间分辨率特性进行准确的评估。空间分辨率通常是在物理幻影上测量的,这可能不能代表DCNN在患者中的真实表现,因为它通常是用患者图像训练和测试的,DNN在物理幻影上的泛化性值得怀疑。在这项工作中,我们提出了一个基于患者数据的框架来测量DCNN方法的空间分辨率,包括在投影域中插入病变和噪声,病变集合平均,以及使用圆柱形病变信号的过采样边缘扩展函数测量调制传递函数。研究了不同病变对比度、剂量水平和CNN去噪强度对使用患者图像训练的基于resnet的DCNN模型的影响。随着造影剂或辐射剂量的减小,或DCNN去噪强度的增大,DCNN重建图像的空间分辨率下降更为严重。DCNN去噪强度最高的50%/10% MTF空间频率为(-500 HU:0.36/0.72 mm-1;-100 HU:0.32/0.65 mm-1;-50 mm-1:0.27/0.53 mm-1;-20 HU:0.18/0.36 mm-1;-10 HU:0.15/0.30 mm-1),而FBP的50%/10% MTF值基本保持在0.38/0.76 mm-1。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Contrast- and noise-dependent spatial resolution measurement for deep convolutional neural network-based noise reduction in CT using patient data.

Deep convolutional neural network (DCNN)-based noise reduction methods have been increasingly deployed in clinical CT. Accurate assessment of their spatial resolution properties is required. Spatial resolution is typically measured on physical phantoms, which may not represent the true performance of DCNN in patients as it is typically trained and tested with patient images and the generalizability of DNN to physical phantoms is questionable. In this work, we proposed a patient-data-based framework to measure the spatial resolution of DCNN methods, which involves lesion- and noise-insertion in projection domain, lesion ensemble averaging, and modulation transfer function measurement using an oversampled edge spread function from the cylindrical lesion signal. The impact of varying lesion contrast, dose levels, and CNN denoising strengths were investigated for a ResNet-based DCNN model trained using patient images. The spatial resolution degradation of DCNN reconstructions becomes more severe as the contrast or radiation dose decreased, or DCNN denoising strength increased. The measured 50%/10% MTF spatial frequencies of DCNN with highest denoising strength were (-500 HU:0.36/0.72 mm-1; -100 HU:0.32/0.65 mm-1; -50 HU:0.27/0.53 mm-1; -20 HU:0.18/0.36 mm-1; -10 HU:0.15/0.30 mm-1), while the 50%/10% MTF values of FBP were almost kept constant of 0.38/0.76 mm-1.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信