光生物调节激光治疗寻常型天疱疮口腔病变:一项随机、双盲、对照研究。

Q2 Dentistry
Stomatologija Pub Date : 2022-01-01
Francesca Amadori, Elena Bardellini, Federica Veneri, Alessandra Majorana
{"title":"光生物调节激光治疗寻常型天疱疮口腔病变:一项随机、双盲、对照研究。","authors":"Francesca Amadori,&nbsp;Elena Bardellini,&nbsp;Federica Veneri,&nbsp;Alessandra Majorana","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Systemic corticosteroids are the mainstay treatment for PV oral lesions; the aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of PBMT with a 645 nm diode laser as a supportive topical therapy in patients with PV induced erosive-ulcerative oral lesions.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This double-blind placebo-controlled study divided patients into two groups: A, patients receiving laser therapy (Raffaello 980 Bio, Dental Medical Technologies, Italy with the following parameters: 100 mW power, 645 nm wave length, irradiation area 1 cm<sup>2</sup>, application time 30 sec/cm<sup>2</sup>, energy density 3 J/cm<sup>2</sup>, scanning modality) and B, receiving sham therapy (placebo). All patients were being treated also with a systemic corticosteroid therapy i.e. prednisone 0.5 mg/Kg per day. Size of lesions, VAS and satisfaction were evaluated before the treatment (T0), after 4 weeks (T1) and after 8 weeks as a follow-up (T2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 50 lesions were evaluated. About lesions size, there was a statistical significative difference between the two groups just at T2 (p=0.0193), though VAS significantly decreased both at T1 (p=0.0198) and at T2 (p=0.0087). In general, all patients were satisfied of the treatment received.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PBMT can be considered a validate supportive therapeutic option, even if further RCTs studies with wide sample sizes and standardized management protocols are suggested.</p>","PeriodicalId":35508,"journal":{"name":"Stomatologija","volume":"24 3","pages":"80-84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Photobiomodulation laser therapy in pemphigus vulgaris oral lesions: A randomized, double-blind, controlled study.\",\"authors\":\"Francesca Amadori,&nbsp;Elena Bardellini,&nbsp;Federica Veneri,&nbsp;Alessandra Majorana\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Systemic corticosteroids are the mainstay treatment for PV oral lesions; the aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of PBMT with a 645 nm diode laser as a supportive topical therapy in patients with PV induced erosive-ulcerative oral lesions.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This double-blind placebo-controlled study divided patients into two groups: A, patients receiving laser therapy (Raffaello 980 Bio, Dental Medical Technologies, Italy with the following parameters: 100 mW power, 645 nm wave length, irradiation area 1 cm<sup>2</sup>, application time 30 sec/cm<sup>2</sup>, energy density 3 J/cm<sup>2</sup>, scanning modality) and B, receiving sham therapy (placebo). All patients were being treated also with a systemic corticosteroid therapy i.e. prednisone 0.5 mg/Kg per day. Size of lesions, VAS and satisfaction were evaluated before the treatment (T0), after 4 weeks (T1) and after 8 weeks as a follow-up (T2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 50 lesions were evaluated. About lesions size, there was a statistical significative difference between the two groups just at T2 (p=0.0193), though VAS significantly decreased both at T1 (p=0.0198) and at T2 (p=0.0087). In general, all patients were satisfied of the treatment received.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PBMT can be considered a validate supportive therapeutic option, even if further RCTs studies with wide sample sizes and standardized management protocols are suggested.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35508,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stomatologija\",\"volume\":\"24 3\",\"pages\":\"80-84\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stomatologija\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stomatologija","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:全身皮质类固醇是治疗PV口腔病变的主要方法;本研究的目的是评估PBMT联合645 nm二极管激光作为支持局部治疗PV诱导的口腔糜烂性溃疡患者的疗效。材料与方法:本双盲安慰剂对照研究将患者分为两组:A组患者接受激光治疗(Raffaello 980 Bio, Dental Medical Technologies, Italy),参数为:功率100 mW,波长645 nm,照射面积1 cm2,应用时间30秒/cm2,能量密度3 J/cm2,扫描方式);B组患者接受假治疗(安慰剂)。所有患者同时接受全身皮质类固醇治疗,即强的松0.5 mg/Kg /天。分别在治疗前(T0)、治疗后4周(T1)和随访后8周(T2)评估病灶大小、VAS及满意度。结果:共评估病变50个。在病变大小方面,两组仅在T2时差异有统计学意义(p=0.0193),但VAS在T1 (p=0.0198)和T2时均显著降低(p=0.0087)。总的来说,所有患者对所接受的治疗都很满意。结论:PBMT可以被认为是一种有效的支持性治疗选择,即使进一步的随机对照试验研究具有广泛的样本量和标准化的管理方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Photobiomodulation laser therapy in pemphigus vulgaris oral lesions: A randomized, double-blind, controlled study.

Objective: Systemic corticosteroids are the mainstay treatment for PV oral lesions; the aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of PBMT with a 645 nm diode laser as a supportive topical therapy in patients with PV induced erosive-ulcerative oral lesions.

Materials and methods: This double-blind placebo-controlled study divided patients into two groups: A, patients receiving laser therapy (Raffaello 980 Bio, Dental Medical Technologies, Italy with the following parameters: 100 mW power, 645 nm wave length, irradiation area 1 cm2, application time 30 sec/cm2, energy density 3 J/cm2, scanning modality) and B, receiving sham therapy (placebo). All patients were being treated also with a systemic corticosteroid therapy i.e. prednisone 0.5 mg/Kg per day. Size of lesions, VAS and satisfaction were evaluated before the treatment (T0), after 4 weeks (T1) and after 8 weeks as a follow-up (T2).

Results: A total of 50 lesions were evaluated. About lesions size, there was a statistical significative difference between the two groups just at T2 (p=0.0193), though VAS significantly decreased both at T1 (p=0.0198) and at T2 (p=0.0087). In general, all patients were satisfied of the treatment received.

Conclusion: PBMT can be considered a validate supportive therapeutic option, even if further RCTs studies with wide sample sizes and standardized management protocols are suggested.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Stomatologija
Stomatologija Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信