脓毒症患者急诊科就诊至ICU入院时间与死亡率的关系

Junichiro Shibata, Itsuki Osawa, Kiyoyasu Fukuchi, Tadahiro Goto
{"title":"脓毒症患者急诊科就诊至ICU入院时间与死亡率的关系","authors":"Junichiro Shibata,&nbsp;Itsuki Osawa,&nbsp;Kiyoyasu Fukuchi,&nbsp;Tadahiro Goto","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000000915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines 2021 recommends that adult patients with sepsis requiring intensive care should be admitted to the ICU within 6 hours of their emergency department (ED) visits. However, there is limited evidence on whether 6 hours is the best target time for compliance with the sepsis bundle. We aimed to investigate the association between time from ED visits to ICU admission (i.e., ED length of stay [ED-LOS]) and mortality and identify the optimal ED-LOS for patients with sepsis.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care Emergency Department and Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV databases.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Adult patients (≥ 18 yr old) who were transferred from the ED to the ICU and subsequently diagnosed with sepsis based on the Sepsis-3 criteria within 24 hours of ICU admission.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Among 1,849 patients with sepsis, we found a disproportionally higher mortality rate in patients immediately admitted to the ICU (e.g., < 2 hr). When using ED-LOS as a continuous variable, ED-LOS was not significantly associated with 28-day mortality (adjusted odds ratio [OR] per hour increase, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.96-1.13; <i>p</i> = 0.3) after an adjustment for potential confounders (e.g., demographics, triage vital signs, and laboratory results) in the multivariable analysis. However, when we categorized all patients into time quartiles (ED-LOS: < 3.3 hr, 3.3-4.5 hr, 4.6-6.1 hr, and > 6.1 hr), patients in the higher time quartiles (e.g., 3.3-4.5 hr) had higher 28-day mortality compared with those in the lowest time quartile (< 3.3 hr) (e.g., adjusted OR for patients in the second time quartile [3.3-4.5 hr] 1.59; 95% CI, 1.03-2.46; <i>p</i> = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Earlier admission to the ICU (e.g., within 3.3 hr of ED visits) was associated with lower 28-day mortality in patients with sepsis. Our findings suggest patients with sepsis who require intensive care may benefit from a more immediate ICU admission than 6 hours.</p>","PeriodicalId":10759,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Explorations","volume":"5 5","pages":"e0915"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/35/8c/cc9-5-e0915.PMC10171575.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Association Between Time From Emergency Department Visit to ICU Admission and Mortality in Patients With Sepsis.\",\"authors\":\"Junichiro Shibata,&nbsp;Itsuki Osawa,&nbsp;Kiyoyasu Fukuchi,&nbsp;Tadahiro Goto\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CCE.0000000000000915\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines 2021 recommends that adult patients with sepsis requiring intensive care should be admitted to the ICU within 6 hours of their emergency department (ED) visits. However, there is limited evidence on whether 6 hours is the best target time for compliance with the sepsis bundle. We aimed to investigate the association between time from ED visits to ICU admission (i.e., ED length of stay [ED-LOS]) and mortality and identify the optimal ED-LOS for patients with sepsis.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care Emergency Department and Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV databases.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Adult patients (≥ 18 yr old) who were transferred from the ED to the ICU and subsequently diagnosed with sepsis based on the Sepsis-3 criteria within 24 hours of ICU admission.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Among 1,849 patients with sepsis, we found a disproportionally higher mortality rate in patients immediately admitted to the ICU (e.g., < 2 hr). When using ED-LOS as a continuous variable, ED-LOS was not significantly associated with 28-day mortality (adjusted odds ratio [OR] per hour increase, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.96-1.13; <i>p</i> = 0.3) after an adjustment for potential confounders (e.g., demographics, triage vital signs, and laboratory results) in the multivariable analysis. However, when we categorized all patients into time quartiles (ED-LOS: < 3.3 hr, 3.3-4.5 hr, 4.6-6.1 hr, and > 6.1 hr), patients in the higher time quartiles (e.g., 3.3-4.5 hr) had higher 28-day mortality compared with those in the lowest time quartile (< 3.3 hr) (e.g., adjusted OR for patients in the second time quartile [3.3-4.5 hr] 1.59; 95% CI, 1.03-2.46; <i>p</i> = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Earlier admission to the ICU (e.g., within 3.3 hr of ED visits) was associated with lower 28-day mortality in patients with sepsis. Our findings suggest patients with sepsis who require intensive care may benefit from a more immediate ICU admission than 6 hours.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Care Explorations\",\"volume\":\"5 5\",\"pages\":\"e0915\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/35/8c/cc9-5-e0915.PMC10171575.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Care Explorations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000915\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Explorations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000915","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

《存活脓毒症运动指南2021》建议,需要重症监护的成年脓毒症患者应在急诊科(ED)就诊后6小时内入住ICU。然而,关于6小时是否为脓毒症治疗包依从性的最佳目标时间的证据有限。我们的目的是调查从急诊科就诊到ICU入院的时间(即急诊科住院时间[ED- los])与死亡率之间的关系,并确定脓毒症患者的最佳ED- los。设计:回顾性队列研究。设置:重症急诊科医学信息集市和重症医学信息集市IV数据库。患者:从急诊科转至ICU的成年患者(≥18岁),随后在ICU入院24小时内根据脓毒症-3标准诊断为脓毒症。干预措施:没有。测量结果和主要结果:在1849例脓毒症患者中,我们发现立即入住ICU(例如< 2小时)的患者死亡率不成比例地更高。当使用ED-LOS作为连续变量时,ED-LOS与28天死亡率无显著相关性(每小时增加的校正优势比[OR]为1.04;95% ci, 0.96-1.13;P = 0.3),在多变量分析中调整了潜在的混杂因素(如人口统计学、分诊生命体征和实验室结果)。然而,当我们将所有患者分为时间四分位数(ED-LOS: < 3.3小时、3.3-4.5小时、4.6-6.1小时和> 6.1小时)时,较高时间四分位数(如3.3-4.5小时)的患者28天死亡率高于最低时间四分位数(< 3.3小时)的患者(例如,第二时间四分位数[3.3-4.5小时]的调整OR为1.59;95% ci, 1.03-2.46;P = 0.04)。结论:脓毒症患者早期入住ICU(例如,在急诊室就诊的3.3小时内)与较低的28天死亡率相关。我们的研究结果表明,需要重症监护的脓毒症患者可以从比6小时更直接的ICU住院中获益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The Association Between Time From Emergency Department Visit to ICU Admission and Mortality in Patients With Sepsis.

The Association Between Time From Emergency Department Visit to ICU Admission and Mortality in Patients With Sepsis.

The Association Between Time From Emergency Department Visit to ICU Admission and Mortality in Patients With Sepsis.

The Association Between Time From Emergency Department Visit to ICU Admission and Mortality in Patients With Sepsis.

The Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines 2021 recommends that adult patients with sepsis requiring intensive care should be admitted to the ICU within 6 hours of their emergency department (ED) visits. However, there is limited evidence on whether 6 hours is the best target time for compliance with the sepsis bundle. We aimed to investigate the association between time from ED visits to ICU admission (i.e., ED length of stay [ED-LOS]) and mortality and identify the optimal ED-LOS for patients with sepsis.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: The Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care Emergency Department and Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV databases.

Patients: Adult patients (≥ 18 yr old) who were transferred from the ED to the ICU and subsequently diagnosed with sepsis based on the Sepsis-3 criteria within 24 hours of ICU admission.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: Among 1,849 patients with sepsis, we found a disproportionally higher mortality rate in patients immediately admitted to the ICU (e.g., < 2 hr). When using ED-LOS as a continuous variable, ED-LOS was not significantly associated with 28-day mortality (adjusted odds ratio [OR] per hour increase, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.96-1.13; p = 0.3) after an adjustment for potential confounders (e.g., demographics, triage vital signs, and laboratory results) in the multivariable analysis. However, when we categorized all patients into time quartiles (ED-LOS: < 3.3 hr, 3.3-4.5 hr, 4.6-6.1 hr, and > 6.1 hr), patients in the higher time quartiles (e.g., 3.3-4.5 hr) had higher 28-day mortality compared with those in the lowest time quartile (< 3.3 hr) (e.g., adjusted OR for patients in the second time quartile [3.3-4.5 hr] 1.59; 95% CI, 1.03-2.46; p = 0.04).

Conclusions: Earlier admission to the ICU (e.g., within 3.3 hr of ED visits) was associated with lower 28-day mortality in patients with sepsis. Our findings suggest patients with sepsis who require intensive care may benefit from a more immediate ICU admission than 6 hours.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信