房颤卒中预防数字化共享决策工具的设计与开发。

IF 2.5 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Julio C Nunes, Tina Baykaner, Krishna Pundi, Katie DeSutter, Mellanie True Hills, Kenneth W Mahaffey, Samuel F Sears, Daniel P Morin, Bryant Lin, Paul J Wang, Randall S Stafford
{"title":"房颤卒中预防数字化共享决策工具的设计与开发。","authors":"Julio C Nunes,&nbsp;Tina Baykaner,&nbsp;Krishna Pundi,&nbsp;Katie DeSutter,&nbsp;Mellanie True Hills,&nbsp;Kenneth W Mahaffey,&nbsp;Samuel F Sears,&nbsp;Daniel P Morin,&nbsp;Bryant Lin,&nbsp;Paul J Wang,&nbsp;Randall S Stafford","doi":"10.1093/jamiaopen/ooad003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Shared decision-making (SDM) is an approach in which patients and clinicians act as partners in making medical decisions. Patients receive the information needed to decide and are encouraged to balance risks, benefits, and preferences. Informative materials are vital to SDM. Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia and responsible for 10% of ischemic strokes, however 1/3 of patients are not on appropriate anticoagulation. Decision sharing may facilitate treatment acceptance, improving outcomes.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To develop a framework of the components needed to create novel SDM tools and to provide practical examples through a case-study of stroke prevention in AF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyze the design values of a web-based SDM tool created to better inform AF patients about anticoagulation. The tool was developed in partnership with patient advocates, multi-disciplinary investigators, and private design firms. It was refined through iterative, recursive testing in patients with AF. Its effectiveness is being evaluated in a multisite clinical trial led by Stanford University and sponsored by the American Heart Association.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The main components considered when creating the Stanford AFib tool included: design and software; content identification; information delivery; inclusive communication, user engagement; patient feedback; clinician experience; and anticipation of implementation and dissemination. We also highlight the ethical principles underlying SDM; matters of diversity and inclusion, linguistic variety, accessibility, and health literacy. The Stanford AFib Guide patient tool is available at: https://afibguide.com and the clinician tool at https://afibguide.com/clinician.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Attention to a range of vital development and design factors can facilitate tool adoption and information acquisition by diverse cultural, educational, and socioeconomic subpopulations. With thoughtful design, digital tools may decrease decision regret and improve treatment outcomes across many decision-making situations in healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":36278,"journal":{"name":"JAMIA Open","volume":"6 1","pages":"ooad003"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/75/c1/ooad003.PMC9893868.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Design and development of a digital shared decision-making tool for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation.\",\"authors\":\"Julio C Nunes,&nbsp;Tina Baykaner,&nbsp;Krishna Pundi,&nbsp;Katie DeSutter,&nbsp;Mellanie True Hills,&nbsp;Kenneth W Mahaffey,&nbsp;Samuel F Sears,&nbsp;Daniel P Morin,&nbsp;Bryant Lin,&nbsp;Paul J Wang,&nbsp;Randall S Stafford\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jamiaopen/ooad003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Shared decision-making (SDM) is an approach in which patients and clinicians act as partners in making medical decisions. Patients receive the information needed to decide and are encouraged to balance risks, benefits, and preferences. Informative materials are vital to SDM. Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia and responsible for 10% of ischemic strokes, however 1/3 of patients are not on appropriate anticoagulation. Decision sharing may facilitate treatment acceptance, improving outcomes.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To develop a framework of the components needed to create novel SDM tools and to provide practical examples through a case-study of stroke prevention in AF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyze the design values of a web-based SDM tool created to better inform AF patients about anticoagulation. The tool was developed in partnership with patient advocates, multi-disciplinary investigators, and private design firms. It was refined through iterative, recursive testing in patients with AF. Its effectiveness is being evaluated in a multisite clinical trial led by Stanford University and sponsored by the American Heart Association.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The main components considered when creating the Stanford AFib tool included: design and software; content identification; information delivery; inclusive communication, user engagement; patient feedback; clinician experience; and anticipation of implementation and dissemination. We also highlight the ethical principles underlying SDM; matters of diversity and inclusion, linguistic variety, accessibility, and health literacy. The Stanford AFib Guide patient tool is available at: https://afibguide.com and the clinician tool at https://afibguide.com/clinician.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Attention to a range of vital development and design factors can facilitate tool adoption and information acquisition by diverse cultural, educational, and socioeconomic subpopulations. With thoughtful design, digital tools may decrease decision regret and improve treatment outcomes across many decision-making situations in healthcare.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36278,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMIA Open\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"ooad003\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/75/c1/ooad003.PMC9893868.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMIA Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooad003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMIA Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooad003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:共同决策(SDM)是一种患者和临床医生作为合作伙伴做出医疗决策的方法。患者获得决定所需的信息,并被鼓励平衡风险、收益和偏好。信息性材料对SDM至关重要。房颤(AF)是最常见的心律失常,占缺血性中风的10%,但1/3的患者没有适当的抗凝治疗。决策共享可以促进治疗的接受,改善结果。目的:为创建新型SDM工具提供一个框架,并通过AF卒中预防案例研究提供实用示例。方法:我们分析了基于web的SDM工具的设计价值,该工具旨在更好地告知AF患者抗凝。该工具是与患者倡导者、多学科研究人员和私人设计公司合作开发的。通过对房颤患者的反复、递归测试,该方法得到了改进。由斯坦福大学领导、美国心脏协会赞助的一项多地点临床试验正在评估其有效性。在创建斯坦福AFib工具时考虑的主要组成部分包括:设计和软件;内容识别;信息交付;包容性沟通,用户粘性;病人的反馈;临床医生经验;以及对实施和传播的预期。我们还强调SDM背后的道德原则;多样性和包容性、语言多样性、可及性和健康素养问题。斯坦福AFib指南患者工具可在https://afibguide.com和临床医生工具https://afibguide.com/clinician.Conclusion:上获得,注意一系列重要的开发和设计因素可以促进不同文化,教育和社会经济亚人群采用工具和信息获取。经过深思熟虑的设计,数字工具可以减少决策后悔,并改善医疗保健中许多决策情况的治疗结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Design and development of a digital shared decision-making tool for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation.

Design and development of a digital shared decision-making tool for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation.

Design and development of a digital shared decision-making tool for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation.

Design and development of a digital shared decision-making tool for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation.

Background: Shared decision-making (SDM) is an approach in which patients and clinicians act as partners in making medical decisions. Patients receive the information needed to decide and are encouraged to balance risks, benefits, and preferences. Informative materials are vital to SDM. Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia and responsible for 10% of ischemic strokes, however 1/3 of patients are not on appropriate anticoagulation. Decision sharing may facilitate treatment acceptance, improving outcomes.

Aims: To develop a framework of the components needed to create novel SDM tools and to provide practical examples through a case-study of stroke prevention in AF.

Methods: We analyze the design values of a web-based SDM tool created to better inform AF patients about anticoagulation. The tool was developed in partnership with patient advocates, multi-disciplinary investigators, and private design firms. It was refined through iterative, recursive testing in patients with AF. Its effectiveness is being evaluated in a multisite clinical trial led by Stanford University and sponsored by the American Heart Association.

Findings: The main components considered when creating the Stanford AFib tool included: design and software; content identification; information delivery; inclusive communication, user engagement; patient feedback; clinician experience; and anticipation of implementation and dissemination. We also highlight the ethical principles underlying SDM; matters of diversity and inclusion, linguistic variety, accessibility, and health literacy. The Stanford AFib Guide patient tool is available at: https://afibguide.com and the clinician tool at https://afibguide.com/clinician.

Conclusion: Attention to a range of vital development and design factors can facilitate tool adoption and information acquisition by diverse cultural, educational, and socioeconomic subpopulations. With thoughtful design, digital tools may decrease decision regret and improve treatment outcomes across many decision-making situations in healthcare.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JAMIA Open
JAMIA Open Medicine-Health Informatics
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.80%
发文量
102
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信