在压力、焦虑和抑郁中,亵渎是一种自我防卫机制和情绪宣泄的出口。

Q1 Psychology
Waqar Husain, Samia Wasif, Insha Fatima
{"title":"在压力、焦虑和抑郁中,亵渎是一种自我防卫机制和情绪宣泄的出口。","authors":"Waqar Husain,&nbsp;Samia Wasif,&nbsp;Insha Fatima","doi":"10.1155/2023/8821517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Swearing is an increasing trend among men and women worldwide. Earlier studies on the positive aspects of profanity mostly relate to pain management and the release of negative emotions. The uniqueness of the current study is its analysis for a possible constructive role of profanity in stress, anxiety, and depression.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The current survey involved 253 conveniently selected participants from Pakistan. The study analyzed the role of profanity in connection to stress, anxiety, and depression. Profanity Scale and the Urdu version of Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale were used along with a structured interview schedule. Descriptive statistics, Pearson's correlation coefficient, and <i>t</i>-test were implied to obtain results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study revealed that the usage of profane language had significantly inverse correlations with stress (<i>r</i> = -0.250; <i>p</i> < 0.01), anxiety (<i>r</i> = -0.161; <i>p</i> < 0.05), and depression (<i>r</i> = -0.182; <i>p</i> < 0.01). Higher profaners also revealed significantly lower levels of depression (M = 29.91, SD = 10.80 vs. M = 33.48, SD = 10.40; <i>p</i> = 0.009; Cohen's <i>d</i> = 0.338) and stress (M = 30.83, SD = 11.41 vs. M = 35.16, SD = 11.31; <i>p</i> = 0.003; Cohen's <i>d</i> = 0.381) as compared to lower profaners. Profanity had no significant correlations with age (<i>r</i> = 0.031; <i>p</i> > 0.05) and education (<i>r</i> = 0.016; <i>p</i> > 0.05). Men projected significantly higher levels of profanity as compared to women.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current study viewed profanity similar to the self-defense mechanisms and emphasized on its cathartic role in stress, anxiety, and depression.</p>","PeriodicalId":38441,"journal":{"name":"Depression Research and Treatment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10171984/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Profanity as a Self-Defense Mechanism and an Outlet for Emotional Catharsis in Stress, Anxiety, and Depression.\",\"authors\":\"Waqar Husain,&nbsp;Samia Wasif,&nbsp;Insha Fatima\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2023/8821517\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Swearing is an increasing trend among men and women worldwide. Earlier studies on the positive aspects of profanity mostly relate to pain management and the release of negative emotions. The uniqueness of the current study is its analysis for a possible constructive role of profanity in stress, anxiety, and depression.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The current survey involved 253 conveniently selected participants from Pakistan. The study analyzed the role of profanity in connection to stress, anxiety, and depression. Profanity Scale and the Urdu version of Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale were used along with a structured interview schedule. Descriptive statistics, Pearson's correlation coefficient, and <i>t</i>-test were implied to obtain results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study revealed that the usage of profane language had significantly inverse correlations with stress (<i>r</i> = -0.250; <i>p</i> < 0.01), anxiety (<i>r</i> = -0.161; <i>p</i> < 0.05), and depression (<i>r</i> = -0.182; <i>p</i> < 0.01). Higher profaners also revealed significantly lower levels of depression (M = 29.91, SD = 10.80 vs. M = 33.48, SD = 10.40; <i>p</i> = 0.009; Cohen's <i>d</i> = 0.338) and stress (M = 30.83, SD = 11.41 vs. M = 35.16, SD = 11.31; <i>p</i> = 0.003; Cohen's <i>d</i> = 0.381) as compared to lower profaners. Profanity had no significant correlations with age (<i>r</i> = 0.031; <i>p</i> > 0.05) and education (<i>r</i> = 0.016; <i>p</i> > 0.05). Men projected significantly higher levels of profanity as compared to women.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current study viewed profanity similar to the self-defense mechanisms and emphasized on its cathartic role in stress, anxiety, and depression.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38441,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Depression Research and Treatment\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10171984/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Depression Research and Treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/8821517\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Depression Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/8821517","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在世界范围内,说脏话的人越来越多。早期关于脏话的积极方面的研究主要涉及疼痛管理和负面情绪的释放。当前研究的独特之处在于,它分析了脏话在压力、焦虑和抑郁中可能发挥的建设性作用。方法:本次调查从巴基斯坦方便地选择了253名参与者。该研究分析了脏话与压力、焦虑和抑郁之间的关系。使用亵渎量表和乌尔都语版的抑郁、焦虑和压力量表以及结构化的面试时间表。采用描述性统计、Pearson相关系数和t检验得到结果。结果:研究发现,亵渎语言的使用与压力呈显著负相关(r = -0.250;P < 0.01),焦虑(r = -0.161;P < 0.05),抑郁(r = -0.182;P < 0.01)。高亵渎者的抑郁水平也显著降低(M = 29.91, SD = 10.80 vs. M = 33.48, SD = 10.40;P = 0.009;Cohen’SD = 0.338)与压力(M = 30.83, SD = 11.41 vs. M = 35.16, SD = 11.31;P = 0.003;Cohen’s d = 0.381)。脏话与年龄无显著相关(r = 0.031;P > 0.05)、教育程度(r = 0.016;P > 0.05)。与女性相比,男性的亵渎程度明显更高。结论:本研究认为亵渎行为与自我防卫机制相似,并强调其在压力、焦虑和抑郁中的宣泄作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Profanity as a Self-Defense Mechanism and an Outlet for Emotional Catharsis in Stress, Anxiety, and Depression.

Background: Swearing is an increasing trend among men and women worldwide. Earlier studies on the positive aspects of profanity mostly relate to pain management and the release of negative emotions. The uniqueness of the current study is its analysis for a possible constructive role of profanity in stress, anxiety, and depression.

Method: The current survey involved 253 conveniently selected participants from Pakistan. The study analyzed the role of profanity in connection to stress, anxiety, and depression. Profanity Scale and the Urdu version of Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale were used along with a structured interview schedule. Descriptive statistics, Pearson's correlation coefficient, and t-test were implied to obtain results.

Results: The study revealed that the usage of profane language had significantly inverse correlations with stress (r = -0.250; p < 0.01), anxiety (r = -0.161; p < 0.05), and depression (r = -0.182; p < 0.01). Higher profaners also revealed significantly lower levels of depression (M = 29.91, SD = 10.80 vs. M = 33.48, SD = 10.40; p = 0.009; Cohen's d = 0.338) and stress (M = 30.83, SD = 11.41 vs. M = 35.16, SD = 11.31; p = 0.003; Cohen's d = 0.381) as compared to lower profaners. Profanity had no significant correlations with age (r = 0.031; p > 0.05) and education (r = 0.016; p > 0.05). Men projected significantly higher levels of profanity as compared to women.

Conclusion: The current study viewed profanity similar to the self-defense mechanisms and emphasized on its cathartic role in stress, anxiety, and depression.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Depression Research and Treatment
Depression Research and Treatment Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信