组学方法评估瘢痕疙瘩和增生性疤痕。

IF 2.6 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
Nazihah Bakhtyar, Saeid Amini-Nik, Marc G Jeschke
{"title":"组学方法评估瘢痕疙瘩和增生性疤痕。","authors":"Nazihah Bakhtyar,&nbsp;Saeid Amini-Nik,&nbsp;Marc G Jeschke","doi":"10.1155/2022/1490492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Abnormal scar formation during wound healing can result in keloid and hypertrophic scars, which is a major global health challenge. Such abnormal scars can cause significant physiological pain and psychological distress and become a financial burden. Due to the biological complexity of scar formation, the pathogenesis of such scars and how to prevent them from forming remains elusive. In this review paper, we delve into the world of \"omics\" approaches to study abnormal scars and provide examples of genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, epigenomics, and metabolomics. The benefits of \"omics\" approaches are that they allow for high-throughput studies and the analysis of 100s to 1000s of genes and proteins with the accumulation of large quantities of data. Currently in the field, there is a lack of \"omics\" review articles describing pathological scars. In this review, we summarize genome-wide linkage analysis, genome-wide association studies, and microarray data to name a few omics technologies. Such data can provide novel insights into different molecular pathways and identify novel factors which may not be captured through small-scale laboratory techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":14004,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Inflammation","volume":"2022 ","pages":"1490492"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9722497/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"OMICS Approaches Evaluating Keloid and Hypertrophic Scars.\",\"authors\":\"Nazihah Bakhtyar,&nbsp;Saeid Amini-Nik,&nbsp;Marc G Jeschke\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2022/1490492\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Abnormal scar formation during wound healing can result in keloid and hypertrophic scars, which is a major global health challenge. Such abnormal scars can cause significant physiological pain and psychological distress and become a financial burden. Due to the biological complexity of scar formation, the pathogenesis of such scars and how to prevent them from forming remains elusive. In this review paper, we delve into the world of \\\"omics\\\" approaches to study abnormal scars and provide examples of genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, epigenomics, and metabolomics. The benefits of \\\"omics\\\" approaches are that they allow for high-throughput studies and the analysis of 100s to 1000s of genes and proteins with the accumulation of large quantities of data. Currently in the field, there is a lack of \\\"omics\\\" review articles describing pathological scars. In this review, we summarize genome-wide linkage analysis, genome-wide association studies, and microarray data to name a few omics technologies. Such data can provide novel insights into different molecular pathways and identify novel factors which may not be captured through small-scale laboratory techniques.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14004,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Inflammation\",\"volume\":\"2022 \",\"pages\":\"1490492\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9722497/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Inflammation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1490492\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Inflammation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1490492","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

伤口愈合过程中异常瘢痕形成可导致瘢痕疙瘩和增生性疤痕,这是一个主要的全球健康挑战。这种不正常的疤痕会引起明显的生理疼痛和心理困扰,并成为经济负担。由于疤痕形成的生物学复杂性,这些疤痕的发病机制以及如何防止它们的形成仍然是难以捉摸的。在这篇综述文章中,我们深入研究了“组学”方法的世界,并提供了基因组学,转录组学,蛋白质组学,表观基因组学和代谢组学的例子。“组学”方法的好处在于,随着大量数据的积累,它们允许高通量研究和对100到1000个基因和蛋白质的分析。目前在该领域,缺乏描述病理性疤痕的“组学”综述文章。在这篇综述中,我们总结了全基因组连锁分析、全基因组关联研究和微阵列数据,以列举一些组学技术。这些数据可以为不同的分子途径提供新的见解,并确定可能无法通过小规模实验室技术捕获的新因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

OMICS Approaches Evaluating Keloid and Hypertrophic Scars.

OMICS Approaches Evaluating Keloid and Hypertrophic Scars.

Abnormal scar formation during wound healing can result in keloid and hypertrophic scars, which is a major global health challenge. Such abnormal scars can cause significant physiological pain and psychological distress and become a financial burden. Due to the biological complexity of scar formation, the pathogenesis of such scars and how to prevent them from forming remains elusive. In this review paper, we delve into the world of "omics" approaches to study abnormal scars and provide examples of genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, epigenomics, and metabolomics. The benefits of "omics" approaches are that they allow for high-throughput studies and the analysis of 100s to 1000s of genes and proteins with the accumulation of large quantities of data. Currently in the field, there is a lack of "omics" review articles describing pathological scars. In this review, we summarize genome-wide linkage analysis, genome-wide association studies, and microarray data to name a few omics technologies. Such data can provide novel insights into different molecular pathways and identify novel factors which may not be captured through small-scale laboratory techniques.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信