氨甲环酸、硝酸甘油和瑞芬太尼预防腰椎间盘突出症手术出血效果的比较:一项随机临床试验。

Q3 Medicine
Hesameddin Modir, Esmail Moshiri, Aidin Shakeri, Mohamad Khalatbari
{"title":"氨甲环酸、硝酸甘油和瑞芬太尼预防腰椎间盘突出症手术出血效果的比较:一项随机临床试验。","authors":"Hesameddin Modir,&nbsp;Esmail Moshiri,&nbsp;Aidin Shakeri,&nbsp;Mohamad Khalatbari","doi":"10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_40_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgery is a well-known and effective method of treating lumbar intervertebral disc herniation. The present study aimed to compare the effects of administering tranexamic acid (TXA), nitroglycerin (NTG), and remifentanil (REF) on hemorrhage prevention during herniated lumbar intervertebral disc surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A double-blind clinical trial was conducted on 135 participants undergoing lumbar intervertebral disc surgery. A randomized block design was used for subject assignment to three groups including TXA, NTG, and REF. The hemodynamic parameters, bleeding rate, hemoglobin level, and the amount of infused propofol were measured and recorded after surgery. Data were then analyzed in SPSS software using Chi-square test and analysis of variance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of participants in the study was 42.12 ± 7.93 years, and all three groups were equal in terms of demographic characteristics (<i>P</i> > 0.05). The mean arterial pressure (MAP) of the TXA and NTG groups was notably higher than the REF group (<i>P</i> < 0.008). The mean heart rate (HR) of the TXA and NTG groups was notably higher than the REF group (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The propofol dosage used in the TXA group was higher than the two groups of NTG and REF (<i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among participants undergoing lumbar intervertebral disc surgery, the greatest MAP variability was observed in the NTG group. Higher mean HR and propofol consumption was observed in the NTG and TXA groups when compared to REF. No statistically significant differences were noted between groups in oxygen saturation or bleeding risk. Based on these findings, REF may be considered a preferred surgical adjunct over TXA and NTG during lumbar intervertebral disc surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":13938,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science","volume":"13 1","pages":"18-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10167810/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the effects of tranexamic acid, nitroglycerin, and remifentanil on the prevention of bleeding during herniated lumbar intervertebral disc surgery: A randomized clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Hesameddin Modir,&nbsp;Esmail Moshiri,&nbsp;Aidin Shakeri,&nbsp;Mohamad Khalatbari\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_40_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgery is a well-known and effective method of treating lumbar intervertebral disc herniation. The present study aimed to compare the effects of administering tranexamic acid (TXA), nitroglycerin (NTG), and remifentanil (REF) on hemorrhage prevention during herniated lumbar intervertebral disc surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A double-blind clinical trial was conducted on 135 participants undergoing lumbar intervertebral disc surgery. A randomized block design was used for subject assignment to three groups including TXA, NTG, and REF. The hemodynamic parameters, bleeding rate, hemoglobin level, and the amount of infused propofol were measured and recorded after surgery. Data were then analyzed in SPSS software using Chi-square test and analysis of variance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of participants in the study was 42.12 ± 7.93 years, and all three groups were equal in terms of demographic characteristics (<i>P</i> > 0.05). The mean arterial pressure (MAP) of the TXA and NTG groups was notably higher than the REF group (<i>P</i> < 0.008). The mean heart rate (HR) of the TXA and NTG groups was notably higher than the REF group (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The propofol dosage used in the TXA group was higher than the two groups of NTG and REF (<i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among participants undergoing lumbar intervertebral disc surgery, the greatest MAP variability was observed in the NTG group. Higher mean HR and propofol consumption was observed in the NTG and TXA groups when compared to REF. No statistically significant differences were noted between groups in oxygen saturation or bleeding risk. Based on these findings, REF may be considered a preferred surgical adjunct over TXA and NTG during lumbar intervertebral disc surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13938,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"18-25\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10167810/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_40_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/3/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_40_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:手术是治疗腰椎间盘突出症的一种众所周知的有效方法。本研究旨在比较氨甲环酸(TXA)、硝酸甘油(NTG)和瑞芬太尼(REF)在腰椎间盘突出症手术中预防出血的效果。方法:对135名腰椎间盘手术患者进行双盲临床试验。采用随机分组设计将受试者分为三组,包括TXA、NTG和REF。术后测量并记录血液动力学参数、出血率、血红蛋白水平和输注丙泊酚的量。然后在SPSS软件中使用卡方检验和方差分析对数据进行分析。结果:研究参与者的平均年龄为42.12±7.93岁,TXA组和NTG组的平均动脉压(MAP)显著高于REF组(P<0.008),TXA组、NTG组平均心率(HR)显著高于EF组(P>0.05)结论:在接受腰椎间盘手术的参与者中,NTG组的MAP变异性最大。与REF相比,NTG和TXA组的平均HR和丙泊酚消耗量更高。两组之间的血氧饱和度或出血风险没有统计学上的显著差异。基于这些发现,在腰椎间盘手术中,REF可能被认为是TXA和NTG的首选手术辅助手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparison of the effects of tranexamic acid, nitroglycerin, and remifentanil on the prevention of bleeding during herniated lumbar intervertebral disc surgery: A randomized clinical trial.

Comparison of the effects of tranexamic acid, nitroglycerin, and remifentanil on the prevention of bleeding during herniated lumbar intervertebral disc surgery: A randomized clinical trial.

Comparison of the effects of tranexamic acid, nitroglycerin, and remifentanil on the prevention of bleeding during herniated lumbar intervertebral disc surgery: A randomized clinical trial.

Comparison of the effects of tranexamic acid, nitroglycerin, and remifentanil on the prevention of bleeding during herniated lumbar intervertebral disc surgery: A randomized clinical trial.

Background: Surgery is a well-known and effective method of treating lumbar intervertebral disc herniation. The present study aimed to compare the effects of administering tranexamic acid (TXA), nitroglycerin (NTG), and remifentanil (REF) on hemorrhage prevention during herniated lumbar intervertebral disc surgery.

Methods: A double-blind clinical trial was conducted on 135 participants undergoing lumbar intervertebral disc surgery. A randomized block design was used for subject assignment to three groups including TXA, NTG, and REF. The hemodynamic parameters, bleeding rate, hemoglobin level, and the amount of infused propofol were measured and recorded after surgery. Data were then analyzed in SPSS software using Chi-square test and analysis of variance.

Results: The mean age of participants in the study was 42.12 ± 7.93 years, and all three groups were equal in terms of demographic characteristics (P > 0.05). The mean arterial pressure (MAP) of the TXA and NTG groups was notably higher than the REF group (P < 0.008). The mean heart rate (HR) of the TXA and NTG groups was notably higher than the REF group (P < 0.05). The propofol dosage used in the TXA group was higher than the two groups of NTG and REF (P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Among participants undergoing lumbar intervertebral disc surgery, the greatest MAP variability was observed in the NTG group. Higher mean HR and propofol consumption was observed in the NTG and TXA groups when compared to REF. No statistically significant differences were noted between groups in oxygen saturation or bleeding risk. Based on these findings, REF may be considered a preferred surgical adjunct over TXA and NTG during lumbar intervertebral disc surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: IJCIIS encourages research, education and dissemination of knowledge in the field of Critical Illness and Injury Science across the world thus promoting translational research by striking a synergy between basic science, clinical medicine and public health. The Journal intends to bring together scientists and academicians in the emergency intensive care and promote translational synergy between Laboratory Science, Clinical Medicine and Public Health. The Journal invites Original Articles, Clinical Investigations, Epidemiological Analysis, Data Protocols, Case Reports, Clinical Photographs, review articles and special commentaries. Students, Residents, Academicians, Public Health experts and scientists are all encouraged to be a part of this initiative by contributing, reviewing and promoting scientific works and science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信