比较2019冠状病毒病大流行期间远程医疗和现场胃肠道癌症基因预约结果

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Samantha Williams, Jessica E Ebrahimzadeh, Daniel Clay, Gillian Constantino, Jordan Heiman, Kirk J Wangensteen, Kathleen Valverde, Nadim Mahmud, Bryson W Katona
{"title":"比较2019冠状病毒病大流行期间远程医疗和现场胃肠道癌症基因预约结果","authors":"Samantha Williams,&nbsp;Jessica E Ebrahimzadeh,&nbsp;Daniel Clay,&nbsp;Gillian Constantino,&nbsp;Jordan Heiman,&nbsp;Kirk J Wangensteen,&nbsp;Kathleen Valverde,&nbsp;Nadim Mahmud,&nbsp;Bryson W Katona","doi":"10.1186/s13053-023-00250-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The study purpose is to compare outcomes associated with completion of genetic testing between telemedicine and in-person gastrointestinal cancer risk assessment appointments during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data was collected on patients with scheduled appointments between July 2020 and June 2021 in a gastrointestinal cancer risk evaluation program (GI-CREP) that utilized both telemedicine and in-person visits throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, and a survey was administered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 293 patients had a GI-CREP appointment scheduled and completion rates of in-person versus telemedicine appointments were similar. Individuals diagnosed with cancer and those with Medicaid insurance had lower rates of appointment completion. Although telehealth was the preferred visit modality, there were no differences in recommending genetic testing nor in the consent rate for genetic testing between in-person and telemedicine visits. However, of patients who consented for genetic testing, more than three times more patients seen via telemedicine did not complete genetic testing compared to those seen in-person (18.3% versus 5.2%, p = 0.008). Furthermore, telemedicine visits had a longer turnaround time for genetic test reporting (32 days versus 13 days, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared to in-person GI-CREP appointments, telemedicine was associated with lower rates of genetic testing completion, and longer turnaround time for results.</p>","PeriodicalId":55058,"journal":{"name":"Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice","volume":"21 1","pages":"6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10165576/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing telemedicine and in-person gastrointestinal cancer genetic appointment outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic.\",\"authors\":\"Samantha Williams,&nbsp;Jessica E Ebrahimzadeh,&nbsp;Daniel Clay,&nbsp;Gillian Constantino,&nbsp;Jordan Heiman,&nbsp;Kirk J Wangensteen,&nbsp;Kathleen Valverde,&nbsp;Nadim Mahmud,&nbsp;Bryson W Katona\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13053-023-00250-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The study purpose is to compare outcomes associated with completion of genetic testing between telemedicine and in-person gastrointestinal cancer risk assessment appointments during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data was collected on patients with scheduled appointments between July 2020 and June 2021 in a gastrointestinal cancer risk evaluation program (GI-CREP) that utilized both telemedicine and in-person visits throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, and a survey was administered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 293 patients had a GI-CREP appointment scheduled and completion rates of in-person versus telemedicine appointments were similar. Individuals diagnosed with cancer and those with Medicaid insurance had lower rates of appointment completion. Although telehealth was the preferred visit modality, there were no differences in recommending genetic testing nor in the consent rate for genetic testing between in-person and telemedicine visits. However, of patients who consented for genetic testing, more than three times more patients seen via telemedicine did not complete genetic testing compared to those seen in-person (18.3% versus 5.2%, p = 0.008). Furthermore, telemedicine visits had a longer turnaround time for genetic test reporting (32 days versus 13 days, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared to in-person GI-CREP appointments, telemedicine was associated with lower rates of genetic testing completion, and longer turnaround time for results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55058,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10165576/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13053-023-00250-8\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13053-023-00250-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究的目的是比较COVID-19大流行期间远程医疗和现场胃肠道癌症风险评估预约之间完成基因检测的相关结果。方法:收集2020年7月至2021年6月期间在胃肠道癌症风险评估项目(GI-CREP)中预约就诊的患者的数据,该项目在COVID-19大流行期间使用远程医疗和亲自就诊,并进行调查。结果:共有293例患者安排了GI-CREP预约,现场预约和远程预约的完成率相似。被诊断患有癌症的人和那些有医疗补助保险的人的预约完成率较低。虽然远程保健是首选的就诊方式,但在建议进行基因检测方面以及在亲自就诊和远程医疗就诊之间同意进行基因检测的比率方面没有差异。然而,在同意进行基因检测的患者中,通过远程医疗就诊的患者没有完成基因检测的人数是当面就诊的患者的三倍多(18.3%对5.2%,p = 0.008)。此外,远程医疗就诊的基因检测报告周转时间较长(32天对13天)。结论:与面对面的GI-CREP预约相比,远程医疗的基因检测完成率较低,结果周转时间较长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparing telemedicine and in-person gastrointestinal cancer genetic appointment outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Comparing telemedicine and in-person gastrointestinal cancer genetic appointment outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Comparing telemedicine and in-person gastrointestinal cancer genetic appointment outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Comparing telemedicine and in-person gastrointestinal cancer genetic appointment outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Background: The study purpose is to compare outcomes associated with completion of genetic testing between telemedicine and in-person gastrointestinal cancer risk assessment appointments during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: Data was collected on patients with scheduled appointments between July 2020 and June 2021 in a gastrointestinal cancer risk evaluation program (GI-CREP) that utilized both telemedicine and in-person visits throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, and a survey was administered.

Results: A total of 293 patients had a GI-CREP appointment scheduled and completion rates of in-person versus telemedicine appointments were similar. Individuals diagnosed with cancer and those with Medicaid insurance had lower rates of appointment completion. Although telehealth was the preferred visit modality, there were no differences in recommending genetic testing nor in the consent rate for genetic testing between in-person and telemedicine visits. However, of patients who consented for genetic testing, more than three times more patients seen via telemedicine did not complete genetic testing compared to those seen in-person (18.3% versus 5.2%, p = 0.008). Furthermore, telemedicine visits had a longer turnaround time for genetic test reporting (32 days versus 13 days, p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Compared to in-person GI-CREP appointments, telemedicine was associated with lower rates of genetic testing completion, and longer turnaround time for results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
38
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice is an open access journal that publishes articles of interest for the cancer genetics community and serves as a discussion forum for the development appropriate healthcare strategies. Cancer genetics encompasses a wide variety of disciplines and knowledge in the field is rapidly growing, especially as the amount of information linking genetic differences to inherited cancer predispositions continues expanding. With the increased knowledge of genetic variability and how this relates to cancer risk there is a growing demand not only to disseminate this information into clinical practice but also to enable competent debate concerning how such information is managed and what it implies for patient care. Topics covered by the journal include but are not limited to: Original research articles on any aspect of inherited predispositions to cancer. Reviews of inherited cancer predispositions. Application of molecular and cytogenetic analysis to clinical decision making. Clinical aspects of the management of hereditary cancers. Genetic counselling issues associated with cancer genetics. The role of registries in improving health care of patients with an inherited predisposition to cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信