[评估 "Rendez-vous "技术与标准疗法在胆总管结石患者中的术后并发症]。

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY
Osvaldo C Barraza-Leones, Juan F Coronado-Sarmiento, Eduardo Valdivieso-Rueda, Óscar J Barrera-León, Enrique C Ramos-Clason
{"title":"[评估 \"Rendez-vous \"技术与标准疗法在胆总管结石患者中的术后并发症]。","authors":"Osvaldo C Barraza-Leones, Juan F Coronado-Sarmiento, Eduardo Valdivieso-Rueda, Óscar J Barrera-León, Enrique C Ramos-Clason","doi":"10.24875/CIRU.21000192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>\"Rendez-vous\" (RV) technique is a mixed-technique which uses both laparoscopic and endoscopic skills; however, the evidence is contradictory regarding the implementation of this technique or the 2-step sequential technique (endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography [ERCP] followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy [LC]) in the management of cholecysto-choledocholitiasis.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To estimate the association between the implementation of RV technique and the presence of post-surgical complications as primary outcome, using as comparator the 2-step sequential technique.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>An observational, analytical, retrospective study was conducted, using as exposed cohort the medical records from patients with a diagnosis of cholelithiasis, cholecystitis, or mild biliary pancreatitis. The exposed cohort underwent RV technique, while the unexposed cohort were those which underwent two step technique.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a lower post-surgical complication rate in the RV group (0%) compared with the 10.1% (p = 0.3617) in the control group. Also, RV technique showed a lesser hospitalization time (p = 0.0377) and a lesser post-surgical hospitalization time (p < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RV technique is superior when compared with the 2-step sequential technique (ERCP followed by LC), based on a better surgical success rate, a fewer complications rate and less hospitalization time.</p>","PeriodicalId":50990,"journal":{"name":"Cirugia Y Cirujanos","volume":" ","pages":"331-337"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Evaluation of post-surgical complications between \\\"Rendez-vous\\\" technique vs. standard care in patients with choledocholithiasis].\",\"authors\":\"Osvaldo C Barraza-Leones, Juan F Coronado-Sarmiento, Eduardo Valdivieso-Rueda, Óscar J Barrera-León, Enrique C Ramos-Clason\",\"doi\":\"10.24875/CIRU.21000192\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>\\\"Rendez-vous\\\" (RV) technique is a mixed-technique which uses both laparoscopic and endoscopic skills; however, the evidence is contradictory regarding the implementation of this technique or the 2-step sequential technique (endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography [ERCP] followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy [LC]) in the management of cholecysto-choledocholitiasis.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To estimate the association between the implementation of RV technique and the presence of post-surgical complications as primary outcome, using as comparator the 2-step sequential technique.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>An observational, analytical, retrospective study was conducted, using as exposed cohort the medical records from patients with a diagnosis of cholelithiasis, cholecystitis, or mild biliary pancreatitis. The exposed cohort underwent RV technique, while the unexposed cohort were those which underwent two step technique.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a lower post-surgical complication rate in the RV group (0%) compared with the 10.1% (p = 0.3617) in the control group. Also, RV technique showed a lesser hospitalization time (p = 0.0377) and a lesser post-surgical hospitalization time (p < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RV technique is superior when compared with the 2-step sequential technique (ERCP followed by LC), based on a better surgical success rate, a fewer complications rate and less hospitalization time.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50990,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cirugia Y Cirujanos\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"331-337\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cirugia Y Cirujanos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24875/CIRU.21000192\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cirugia Y Cirujanos","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24875/CIRU.21000192","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:"Rendez-vous"(RV)技术是一种混合技术,同时使用腹腔镜和内镜技术;然而,在胆囊胆管炎的治疗中,该技术与两步顺序技术(内镜逆行胰胆管造影术[ERCP],然后腹腔镜胆囊切除术[LC])的实施情况存在矛盾:以两步顺序技术为比较对象,估计RV技术的实施与作为主要结果的术后并发症发生率之间的关系:方法:以诊断为胆石症、胆囊炎或轻度胆源性胰腺炎的患者病历为暴露队列,开展了一项观察性、分析性、回顾性研究。暴露人群接受了 RV 技术,而未暴露人群则接受了两步技术:结果:RV 组的术后并发症发生率(0%)低于对照组的 10.1%(P = 0.3617)。此外,RV 技术的住院时间更短(p = 0.0377),手术后住院时间更短(p < 0.0001):结论:RV 技术与两步顺序技术(ERCP 后进行 LC)相比,手术成功率更高,并发症发生率更低,住院时间更短,因此更有优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Evaluation of post-surgical complications between "Rendez-vous" technique vs. standard care in patients with choledocholithiasis].

Background: "Rendez-vous" (RV) technique is a mixed-technique which uses both laparoscopic and endoscopic skills; however, the evidence is contradictory regarding the implementation of this technique or the 2-step sequential technique (endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography [ERCP] followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy [LC]) in the management of cholecysto-choledocholitiasis.

Objective: To estimate the association between the implementation of RV technique and the presence of post-surgical complications as primary outcome, using as comparator the 2-step sequential technique.

Method: An observational, analytical, retrospective study was conducted, using as exposed cohort the medical records from patients with a diagnosis of cholelithiasis, cholecystitis, or mild biliary pancreatitis. The exposed cohort underwent RV technique, while the unexposed cohort were those which underwent two step technique.

Results: There was a lower post-surgical complication rate in the RV group (0%) compared with the 10.1% (p = 0.3617) in the control group. Also, RV technique showed a lesser hospitalization time (p = 0.0377) and a lesser post-surgical hospitalization time (p < 0.0001).

Conclusions: RV technique is superior when compared with the 2-step sequential technique (ERCP followed by LC), based on a better surgical success rate, a fewer complications rate and less hospitalization time.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cirugia Y Cirujanos
Cirugia Y Cirujanos 医学-外科
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
20.00%
发文量
207
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cirugía y Cirujanoses exponente del desarrollo académico, científico, médico, quirúrgico y tecnológico en materia de salud en México y en el ámbito internacional. Es una revista bimestral, open access, revisada por pares, que publica en español y en inglés (traducido sin coste para los autores) artículos científicos originales, casos clínicos, artículos de revisión de interés general y cartas al editor. Los artículos se seleccionan y publican siguiendo un riguroso análisis, de acuerdo con los estándares internacionalmente aceptados. Sus espacios están abiertos a los académicos, así como a todo miembro de la comunidad médica que manifieste interés por utilizar este foro para publicar sus trabajos.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信