对格鲁吉亚宫颈癌筛查障碍的评估。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Gvantsa Guliashvili, Iamze Taboridze, Nana Mebonia, Tamar Alibegashvili, Nata Kazakhashvili, Paata Imnadze
{"title":"对格鲁吉亚宫颈癌筛查障碍的评估。","authors":"Gvantsa Guliashvili,&nbsp;Iamze Taboridze,&nbsp;Nana Mebonia,&nbsp;Tamar Alibegashvili,&nbsp;Nata Kazakhashvili,&nbsp;Paata Imnadze","doi":"10.21101/cejph.a7621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The Cervical Cancer (CC) Screening Programme in Georgia provides insufficient coverage of the target population. The aim of the study is to identify the barriers to cervical cancer screening for women in Georgia in order to plan and implement adequate measures to increase the screening effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study is based on the results of a survey of 582 women aged 25-60 years (mean age 42.11 + 12.17). Respondents were selected in out-patient clinics. The questionnaire included questions related to the place of residence, ethnicity, religion, marital status, education, employment, cervical cancer awareness and screening, screening participation practices, and barriers to participation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The following factors reliably increase the chance of participating in the screening: residing in Tbilisi, OR = 1.84 (95% CI: 1.10-3.07); higher education, OR = 1.87 (95% CI: 1.09-3.19); being employed as a nurse, OR = 3.42 (95% CI: 1.49-7.85); receiving screening-related information from medical staff, OR = 2.43 (95% CI: 1.42-4.15); and from television, OR = 2.57 (95% CI: 1.47-4.50). The chance of participating in the screening is reduced due to incomplete secondary education, OR = 0.10 (95% CI: 0.01-0.77); single marital status, OR = 0.49 (95% CI: 0.28-0.87); employment in public service, OR = 0.39 (95% CI: 0.17-0.89); and receiving screening-related information from friends, OR = 0.26 (95% CI: 0.09-0.77). Women with higher education are undoubtedly more informed about screening, screening procedures and free programmes than those without higher education. The common barrier to participation in the screening was \"fear of the manipulation-related pain\" but the most frequent answer was \"I'm afraid that the test will detect cancer (36.3%).\" Women with a lower level of education are more likely to believe that \"Pap testing is appropriate for the women who have active sexual life\", and/or \"have multiple sexual partners\", and/or \"have children,\" and \"it is not necessary if a woman has no complaints\".</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Screening participation among women in Georgia depends on screening availability, formal education and awareness of CC, sources of information, and employment type.</p>","PeriodicalId":9823,"journal":{"name":"Central European journal of public health","volume":"31 1","pages":"9-18"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of barriers to cervical cancer screening in Georgia.\",\"authors\":\"Gvantsa Guliashvili,&nbsp;Iamze Taboridze,&nbsp;Nana Mebonia,&nbsp;Tamar Alibegashvili,&nbsp;Nata Kazakhashvili,&nbsp;Paata Imnadze\",\"doi\":\"10.21101/cejph.a7621\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The Cervical Cancer (CC) Screening Programme in Georgia provides insufficient coverage of the target population. The aim of the study is to identify the barriers to cervical cancer screening for women in Georgia in order to plan and implement adequate measures to increase the screening effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study is based on the results of a survey of 582 women aged 25-60 years (mean age 42.11 + 12.17). Respondents were selected in out-patient clinics. The questionnaire included questions related to the place of residence, ethnicity, religion, marital status, education, employment, cervical cancer awareness and screening, screening participation practices, and barriers to participation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The following factors reliably increase the chance of participating in the screening: residing in Tbilisi, OR = 1.84 (95% CI: 1.10-3.07); higher education, OR = 1.87 (95% CI: 1.09-3.19); being employed as a nurse, OR = 3.42 (95% CI: 1.49-7.85); receiving screening-related information from medical staff, OR = 2.43 (95% CI: 1.42-4.15); and from television, OR = 2.57 (95% CI: 1.47-4.50). The chance of participating in the screening is reduced due to incomplete secondary education, OR = 0.10 (95% CI: 0.01-0.77); single marital status, OR = 0.49 (95% CI: 0.28-0.87); employment in public service, OR = 0.39 (95% CI: 0.17-0.89); and receiving screening-related information from friends, OR = 0.26 (95% CI: 0.09-0.77). Women with higher education are undoubtedly more informed about screening, screening procedures and free programmes than those without higher education. The common barrier to participation in the screening was \\\"fear of the manipulation-related pain\\\" but the most frequent answer was \\\"I'm afraid that the test will detect cancer (36.3%).\\\" Women with a lower level of education are more likely to believe that \\\"Pap testing is appropriate for the women who have active sexual life\\\", and/or \\\"have multiple sexual partners\\\", and/or \\\"have children,\\\" and \\\"it is not necessary if a woman has no complaints\\\".</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Screening participation among women in Georgia depends on screening availability, formal education and awareness of CC, sources of information, and employment type.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9823,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Central European journal of public health\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"9-18\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Central European journal of public health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21101/cejph.a7621\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central European journal of public health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21101/cejph.a7621","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:格鲁吉亚的宫颈癌(CC)筛查方案对目标人群的覆盖率不足。这项研究的目的是确定格鲁吉亚妇女进行宫颈癌筛查的障碍,以便计划和执行适当的措施,提高筛查的有效性。方法:对582名25-60岁女性(平均年龄42.11 + 12.17岁)进行调查。受访者是在门诊选定的。调查问卷的问题包括居住地、种族、宗教、婚姻状况、教育程度、就业、对宫颈癌的认识和筛查、参与筛查的做法以及参与的障碍。结果:以下因素可靠地增加了参加筛查的机会:居住在第比利斯,OR = 1.84 (95% CI: 1.10-3.07);高等教育,OR = 1.87 (95% CI: 1.09-3.19);被聘为护士,OR = 3.42 (95% CI: 1.49-7.85);从医务人员那里获得筛查相关信息,OR = 2.43 (95% CI: 1.42-4.15);从电视中,OR = 2.57 (95% CI: 1.47-4.50)。参加筛查的机会因未完成中等教育而降低,OR = 0.10 (95% CI: 0.01-0.77);单身婚姻状况,OR = 0.49 (95% CI: 0.28-0.87);公共服务就业,OR = 0.39 (95% CI: 0.17-0.89);从朋友那里接收筛查相关信息,OR = 0.26 (95% CI: 0.09-0.77)。受过高等教育的妇女无疑比没有受过高等教育的妇女更了解检查、检查程序和免费方案。参与筛查的常见障碍是“害怕与操作相关的疼痛”,但最常见的答案是“我害怕测试会发现癌症(36.3%)”。受教育程度较低的妇女更有可能认为“巴氏试验适用于性生活活跃的妇女”和/或“有多个性伴侣的妇女”和/或“有孩子的妇女”,以及“如果妇女没有抱怨,则没有必要”。结论:格鲁吉亚妇女参与筛查取决于筛查的可得性、正规教育和对CC的认识、信息来源和就业类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of barriers to cervical cancer screening in Georgia.

Objectives: The Cervical Cancer (CC) Screening Programme in Georgia provides insufficient coverage of the target population. The aim of the study is to identify the barriers to cervical cancer screening for women in Georgia in order to plan and implement adequate measures to increase the screening effectiveness.

Methods: The study is based on the results of a survey of 582 women aged 25-60 years (mean age 42.11 + 12.17). Respondents were selected in out-patient clinics. The questionnaire included questions related to the place of residence, ethnicity, religion, marital status, education, employment, cervical cancer awareness and screening, screening participation practices, and barriers to participation.

Results: The following factors reliably increase the chance of participating in the screening: residing in Tbilisi, OR = 1.84 (95% CI: 1.10-3.07); higher education, OR = 1.87 (95% CI: 1.09-3.19); being employed as a nurse, OR = 3.42 (95% CI: 1.49-7.85); receiving screening-related information from medical staff, OR = 2.43 (95% CI: 1.42-4.15); and from television, OR = 2.57 (95% CI: 1.47-4.50). The chance of participating in the screening is reduced due to incomplete secondary education, OR = 0.10 (95% CI: 0.01-0.77); single marital status, OR = 0.49 (95% CI: 0.28-0.87); employment in public service, OR = 0.39 (95% CI: 0.17-0.89); and receiving screening-related information from friends, OR = 0.26 (95% CI: 0.09-0.77). Women with higher education are undoubtedly more informed about screening, screening procedures and free programmes than those without higher education. The common barrier to participation in the screening was "fear of the manipulation-related pain" but the most frequent answer was "I'm afraid that the test will detect cancer (36.3%)." Women with a lower level of education are more likely to believe that "Pap testing is appropriate for the women who have active sexual life", and/or "have multiple sexual partners", and/or "have children," and "it is not necessary if a woman has no complaints".

Conclusion: Screening participation among women in Georgia depends on screening availability, formal education and awareness of CC, sources of information, and employment type.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Central European journal of public health
Central European journal of public health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The Journal publishes original articles on disease prevention and health protection, environmental impacts on health, the role of nutrition in health promotion, results of population health studies and critiques of specific health issues including intervention measures such as vaccination and its effectiveness. The review articles are targeted at providing up-to-date information in the sphere of public health. The Journal is geographically targeted at the European region but will accept specialised articles from foreign sources that contribute to public health issues also applicable to the European cultural milieu.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信