Jakob Hasselstrøm Jensen, Peter Vestergaard, Morten Hasselstrøm Jensen
{"title":"2 型糖尿病患者的降糖治疗与糖尿病视网膜病变风险之间的关系:全国队列研究","authors":"Jakob Hasselstrøm Jensen, Peter Vestergaard, Morten Hasselstrøm Jensen","doi":"10.2174/1574886318666230420084701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Glycaemic variability is possibly linked to the development of diabetic retinopathy, and newer second-line glucose-lowering treatments in type 2 diabetes might reduce glycaemic variability.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to investigate whether newer second-line glucose-lowering treatments are associated with an alternative risk of developing diabetic retinopathy in people with type 2 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A nationwide cohort of people with type 2 diabetes on second-line glucose-lowering treatment regimens in 2008-2018 was extracted from the Danish National Patient Registry. Adjusted time to diabetic retinopathy was estimated with a Cox Proportional Hazards model. The model was adjusted for age, sex, diabetes duration, alcohol abuse, treatment start year, education, income, history of late-diabetic complications, history of non-fatal major adverse cardiovascular events, history of chronic kidney disease, and history of hypoglycaemic episodes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Treatment regimens of metformin + basal insulin (HR: 3.15, 95% CI: 2.42-4.10) and metformin + glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1-RA, HR: 1.46, 95% CI: 1.09-1.96) were associated with an increased risk of diabetic retinopathy compared with metformin + dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i). Treatment with metformin + sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2i, HR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.28-2.11) was associated with the numerically lowest risk of diabetic retinopathy compared with all regimens investigated.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings from this study indicate that basal insulin and GLP-1-RA are suboptimal second- line choices for people with type 2 diabetes at risk of developing diabetic retinopathy. However, many other considerations concerning the choice of second-line glucose-lowering treatment for type 2 diabetes patients should be taken into account.</p>","PeriodicalId":10777,"journal":{"name":"Current drug safety","volume":" ","pages":"236-243"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association between Glucose-lowering Treatments and Risk of Diabetic Retinopathy in People with Type 2 Diabetes: A Nationwide Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Jakob Hasselstrøm Jensen, Peter Vestergaard, Morten Hasselstrøm Jensen\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1574886318666230420084701\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Glycaemic variability is possibly linked to the development of diabetic retinopathy, and newer second-line glucose-lowering treatments in type 2 diabetes might reduce glycaemic variability.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to investigate whether newer second-line glucose-lowering treatments are associated with an alternative risk of developing diabetic retinopathy in people with type 2 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A nationwide cohort of people with type 2 diabetes on second-line glucose-lowering treatment regimens in 2008-2018 was extracted from the Danish National Patient Registry. Adjusted time to diabetic retinopathy was estimated with a Cox Proportional Hazards model. The model was adjusted for age, sex, diabetes duration, alcohol abuse, treatment start year, education, income, history of late-diabetic complications, history of non-fatal major adverse cardiovascular events, history of chronic kidney disease, and history of hypoglycaemic episodes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Treatment regimens of metformin + basal insulin (HR: 3.15, 95% CI: 2.42-4.10) and metformin + glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1-RA, HR: 1.46, 95% CI: 1.09-1.96) were associated with an increased risk of diabetic retinopathy compared with metformin + dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i). Treatment with metformin + sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2i, HR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.28-2.11) was associated with the numerically lowest risk of diabetic retinopathy compared with all regimens investigated.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings from this study indicate that basal insulin and GLP-1-RA are suboptimal second- line choices for people with type 2 diabetes at risk of developing diabetic retinopathy. However, many other considerations concerning the choice of second-line glucose-lowering treatment for type 2 diabetes patients should be taken into account.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10777,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current drug safety\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"236-243\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current drug safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1574886318666230420084701\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current drug safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1574886318666230420084701","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Association between Glucose-lowering Treatments and Risk of Diabetic Retinopathy in People with Type 2 Diabetes: A Nationwide Cohort Study.
Introduction: Glycaemic variability is possibly linked to the development of diabetic retinopathy, and newer second-line glucose-lowering treatments in type 2 diabetes might reduce glycaemic variability.
Aim: This study aimed to investigate whether newer second-line glucose-lowering treatments are associated with an alternative risk of developing diabetic retinopathy in people with type 2 diabetes.
Methods: A nationwide cohort of people with type 2 diabetes on second-line glucose-lowering treatment regimens in 2008-2018 was extracted from the Danish National Patient Registry. Adjusted time to diabetic retinopathy was estimated with a Cox Proportional Hazards model. The model was adjusted for age, sex, diabetes duration, alcohol abuse, treatment start year, education, income, history of late-diabetic complications, history of non-fatal major adverse cardiovascular events, history of chronic kidney disease, and history of hypoglycaemic episodes.
Results: Treatment regimens of metformin + basal insulin (HR: 3.15, 95% CI: 2.42-4.10) and metformin + glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1-RA, HR: 1.46, 95% CI: 1.09-1.96) were associated with an increased risk of diabetic retinopathy compared with metformin + dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i). Treatment with metformin + sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2i, HR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.28-2.11) was associated with the numerically lowest risk of diabetic retinopathy compared with all regimens investigated.
Conclusion: Findings from this study indicate that basal insulin and GLP-1-RA are suboptimal second- line choices for people with type 2 diabetes at risk of developing diabetic retinopathy. However, many other considerations concerning the choice of second-line glucose-lowering treatment for type 2 diabetes patients should be taken into account.
期刊介绍:
Current Drug Safety publishes frontier articles on all the latest advances on drug safety. The journal aims to publish the highest quality research articles, reviews and case reports in the field. Topics covered include: adverse effects of individual drugs and drug classes, management of adverse effects, pharmacovigilance and pharmacoepidemiology of new and existing drugs, post-marketing surveillance. The journal is essential reading for all researchers and clinicians involved in drug safety.