治疗与澳大利亚野生动物交叉相关的疥疮的药代动力学和药效学考虑

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 PARASITOLOGY
Kotaro Takano , Lachlan de Hayr , Scott Carver , Robert J. Harvey , Kate E. Mounsey
{"title":"治疗与澳大利亚野生动物交叉相关的疥疮的药代动力学和药效学考虑","authors":"Kotaro Takano ,&nbsp;Lachlan de Hayr ,&nbsp;Scott Carver ,&nbsp;Robert J. Harvey ,&nbsp;Kate E. Mounsey","doi":"10.1016/j.ijpddr.2023.02.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><em>Sarcoptes scabiei</em> is the microscopic burrowing mite responsible for sarcoptic mange, which is reported in approximately 150 mammalian species. In Australia, sarcoptic mange affects a number of native and introduced wildlife species, is particularly severe in bare-nosed wombats (<em>Vombatus ursinus</em>) and an emerging issue in koala and quenda. There are a variety of acaricides available for the treatment of sarcoptic mange which are generally effective in eliminating mites from humans and animals in captivity. In wild populations, effective treatment is challenging, and concerns exist regarding safety, efficacy and the potential emergence of acaricide resistance. There are risks where acaricides are used intensively or inadequately, which could adversely affect treatment success rates as well as animal welfare. While reviews on epidemiology, treatment strategies, and pathogenesis of sarcoptic mange in wildlife are available, there is currently no review evaluating the use of specific acaricides in the context of their pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, and subsequent likelihood of emerging drug resistance, particularly for Australian wildlife. This review critically evaluates acaricides that have been utilised to treat sarcoptic mange in wildlife, including dosage forms and routes, pharmacokinetics, mode of action and efficacy. We also highlight the reports of resistance of <em>S. scabiei</em> to acaricides, including clinical and <em>in vitro</em> observations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":13775,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Parasitology: Drugs and Drug Resistance","volume":"21 ","pages":"Pages 97-113"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ea/68/main.PMC10023865.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations for treating sarcoptic mange with cross-relevance to Australian wildlife\",\"authors\":\"Kotaro Takano ,&nbsp;Lachlan de Hayr ,&nbsp;Scott Carver ,&nbsp;Robert J. Harvey ,&nbsp;Kate E. Mounsey\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijpddr.2023.02.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><em>Sarcoptes scabiei</em> is the microscopic burrowing mite responsible for sarcoptic mange, which is reported in approximately 150 mammalian species. In Australia, sarcoptic mange affects a number of native and introduced wildlife species, is particularly severe in bare-nosed wombats (<em>Vombatus ursinus</em>) and an emerging issue in koala and quenda. There are a variety of acaricides available for the treatment of sarcoptic mange which are generally effective in eliminating mites from humans and animals in captivity. In wild populations, effective treatment is challenging, and concerns exist regarding safety, efficacy and the potential emergence of acaricide resistance. There are risks where acaricides are used intensively or inadequately, which could adversely affect treatment success rates as well as animal welfare. While reviews on epidemiology, treatment strategies, and pathogenesis of sarcoptic mange in wildlife are available, there is currently no review evaluating the use of specific acaricides in the context of their pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, and subsequent likelihood of emerging drug resistance, particularly for Australian wildlife. This review critically evaluates acaricides that have been utilised to treat sarcoptic mange in wildlife, including dosage forms and routes, pharmacokinetics, mode of action and efficacy. We also highlight the reports of resistance of <em>S. scabiei</em> to acaricides, including clinical and <em>in vitro</em> observations.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13775,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal for Parasitology: Drugs and Drug Resistance\",\"volume\":\"21 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 97-113\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ea/68/main.PMC10023865.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal for Parasitology: Drugs and Drug Resistance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211320723000088\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PARASITOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Parasitology: Drugs and Drug Resistance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211320723000088","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PARASITOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

疥疮是一种微小的穴居螨,负责疥疮,据报道,大约有150种哺乳动物患有疥疮。在澳大利亚,疥疮影响着许多本地和引进的野生动物物种,在裸鼻袋熊(Vombatus ursinus)中尤为严重,在考拉和昆达中也出现了新的问题。有多种杀螨剂可用于治疗疥螨,这些杀螨剂通常能有效地清除圈养的人类和动物身上的螨虫。在野生种群中,有效的治疗是具有挑战性的,并且存在对安全性、有效性和潜在的杀螨耐药性的担忧。杀螨剂使用密集或不足都有风险,这可能会对治疗成功率和动物福利产生不利影响。虽然可以对野生动物疥疮的流行病学、治疗策略和发病机制进行综述,但目前还没有对特定杀螨剂的药代动力学和药效学特性以及随后出现耐药性的可能性进行评估的综述,尤其是对澳大利亚野生动物。这篇综述对用于治疗野生动物疥疮的杀螨剂进行了批判性评估,包括剂型和途径、药代动力学、作用方式和疗效。我们还重点报道了疥螨对杀螨剂的耐药性,包括临床和体外观察。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations for treating sarcoptic mange with cross-relevance to Australian wildlife

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations for treating sarcoptic mange with cross-relevance to Australian wildlife

Sarcoptes scabiei is the microscopic burrowing mite responsible for sarcoptic mange, which is reported in approximately 150 mammalian species. In Australia, sarcoptic mange affects a number of native and introduced wildlife species, is particularly severe in bare-nosed wombats (Vombatus ursinus) and an emerging issue in koala and quenda. There are a variety of acaricides available for the treatment of sarcoptic mange which are generally effective in eliminating mites from humans and animals in captivity. In wild populations, effective treatment is challenging, and concerns exist regarding safety, efficacy and the potential emergence of acaricide resistance. There are risks where acaricides are used intensively or inadequately, which could adversely affect treatment success rates as well as animal welfare. While reviews on epidemiology, treatment strategies, and pathogenesis of sarcoptic mange in wildlife are available, there is currently no review evaluating the use of specific acaricides in the context of their pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, and subsequent likelihood of emerging drug resistance, particularly for Australian wildlife. This review critically evaluates acaricides that have been utilised to treat sarcoptic mange in wildlife, including dosage forms and routes, pharmacokinetics, mode of action and efficacy. We also highlight the reports of resistance of S. scabiei to acaricides, including clinical and in vitro observations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
7.50%
发文量
31
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal for Parasitology – Drugs and Drug Resistance is one of a series of specialist, open access journals launched by the International Journal for Parasitology. It publishes the results of original research in the area of anti-parasite drug identification, development and evaluation, and parasite drug resistance. The journal also covers research into natural products as anti-parasitic agents, and bioactive parasite products. Studies can be aimed at unicellular or multicellular parasites of human or veterinary importance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信