与传统化疗相比,blinatumumab治疗复发或难治性b细胞前体急性淋巴细胞白血病的成人患者的生存率更高:一项倾向评分匹配的队列分析

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Jae-Ho Yoon, Daehun Kwag, Jong-Hyuk Lee, Gi June Min, Sung-Soo Park, Silvia Park, Sung-Eun Lee, Byung-Sik Cho, Ki-Seong Eom, Yoo-Jin Kim, Hee-Je Kim, Chang-Ki Min, Seok-Goo Cho, Jong Wook Lee, Seok Lee
{"title":"与传统化疗相比,blinatumumab治疗复发或难治性b细胞前体急性淋巴细胞白血病的成人患者的生存率更高:一项倾向评分匹配的队列分析","authors":"Jae-Ho Yoon,&nbsp;Daehun Kwag,&nbsp;Jong-Hyuk Lee,&nbsp;Gi June Min,&nbsp;Sung-Soo Park,&nbsp;Silvia Park,&nbsp;Sung-Eun Lee,&nbsp;Byung-Sik Cho,&nbsp;Ki-Seong Eom,&nbsp;Yoo-Jin Kim,&nbsp;Hee-Je Kim,&nbsp;Chang-Ki Min,&nbsp;Seok-Goo Cho,&nbsp;Jong Wook Lee,&nbsp;Seok Lee","doi":"10.1177/20406207231154713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Blinatumomab showed a higher complete remission (CR) rate and a safe bridging to allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) in adults with relapsed or refractory B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R BCP-ALL).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We tried to analyze the outcome of blinatumomab compared with the real-world historical data. We expected superior outcome of blinatumomab compared with historical conventional chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We conducted a retrospective study using real-world data in the Catholic Hematology Hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Total 197 consecutive cases of R/R BCP-ALL were treated with conventional chemotherapy (<i>n</i> = 113) or blinatumomab, which was available since late 2016 (<i>n</i> = 84). Patients who achieved CR underwent allo-HCT if donor was available. We conducted a propensity score-matched cohort analysis using 5 criteria of age, CR duration, cytogenetics, previous allo-HCT, and salvage lines between historical group and blinatumomab.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Each cohort consisted of 52 patients. In blinatumomab group, CR rate was higher (80.8% <i>versus</i> 53.8%, <i>p</i> = 0.006) and more patients proceeded to allo-HCT (80.8% <i>versus</i> 46.2%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Among the CR patients with available minimal residual disease (MRD) results, 68.6% in blinatumomab group and 40.0% in conventional chemotherapy group were MRD-negative. Regimen-related mortality during the chemotherapy cycles was significantly higher in the conventional chemotherapy group (40.4% <i>versus</i> 1.9%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Estimated 3-year overall survival (OS) was 33.2% (median, 26.3 months) after blinatumomab, and 15.4% (median, 8.2 months) after conventional chemotherapy (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Estimated 3-year non-relapse mortality were 30.3% and 51.9% (<i>p</i> = 0.004), respectively. In multivariate analysis, CR duration < 12 months showed more relapses and poor OS, and conventional chemotherapy showed higher non-relapse mortality and poor OS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Matched cohort analysis showed superior outcomes of blinatumomab compared with conventional chemotherapy. However, large numbers of relapses and non-relapse mortalities continue to occur even after blinatumomab followed by allo-HCT. Novel therapeutic strategies are still needed for R/R BCP-ALL.</p>","PeriodicalId":23048,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Hematology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/9c/a7/10.1177_20406207231154713.PMC9989437.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Superior survival outcome of blinatumomab compared with conventional chemotherapy for adult patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a propensity score-matched cohort analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Jae-Ho Yoon,&nbsp;Daehun Kwag,&nbsp;Jong-Hyuk Lee,&nbsp;Gi June Min,&nbsp;Sung-Soo Park,&nbsp;Silvia Park,&nbsp;Sung-Eun Lee,&nbsp;Byung-Sik Cho,&nbsp;Ki-Seong Eom,&nbsp;Yoo-Jin Kim,&nbsp;Hee-Je Kim,&nbsp;Chang-Ki Min,&nbsp;Seok-Goo Cho,&nbsp;Jong Wook Lee,&nbsp;Seok Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20406207231154713\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Blinatumomab showed a higher complete remission (CR) rate and a safe bridging to allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) in adults with relapsed or refractory B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R BCP-ALL).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We tried to analyze the outcome of blinatumomab compared with the real-world historical data. We expected superior outcome of blinatumomab compared with historical conventional chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We conducted a retrospective study using real-world data in the Catholic Hematology Hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Total 197 consecutive cases of R/R BCP-ALL were treated with conventional chemotherapy (<i>n</i> = 113) or blinatumomab, which was available since late 2016 (<i>n</i> = 84). Patients who achieved CR underwent allo-HCT if donor was available. We conducted a propensity score-matched cohort analysis using 5 criteria of age, CR duration, cytogenetics, previous allo-HCT, and salvage lines between historical group and blinatumomab.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Each cohort consisted of 52 patients. In blinatumomab group, CR rate was higher (80.8% <i>versus</i> 53.8%, <i>p</i> = 0.006) and more patients proceeded to allo-HCT (80.8% <i>versus</i> 46.2%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Among the CR patients with available minimal residual disease (MRD) results, 68.6% in blinatumomab group and 40.0% in conventional chemotherapy group were MRD-negative. Regimen-related mortality during the chemotherapy cycles was significantly higher in the conventional chemotherapy group (40.4% <i>versus</i> 1.9%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Estimated 3-year overall survival (OS) was 33.2% (median, 26.3 months) after blinatumomab, and 15.4% (median, 8.2 months) after conventional chemotherapy (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Estimated 3-year non-relapse mortality were 30.3% and 51.9% (<i>p</i> = 0.004), respectively. In multivariate analysis, CR duration < 12 months showed more relapses and poor OS, and conventional chemotherapy showed higher non-relapse mortality and poor OS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Matched cohort analysis showed superior outcomes of blinatumomab compared with conventional chemotherapy. However, large numbers of relapses and non-relapse mortalities continue to occur even after blinatumomab followed by allo-HCT. Novel therapeutic strategies are still needed for R/R BCP-ALL.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23048,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Hematology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/9c/a7/10.1177_20406207231154713.PMC9989437.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Hematology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20406207231154713\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20406207231154713","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在复发或难治性b细胞前体急性淋巴细胞白血病(R/R BCP-ALL)的成人患者中,Blinatumomab显示出更高的完全缓解(CR)率和安全的异基因造血细胞移植(alloo - hct)桥接。目的:我们试图将blinatumomab的结果与现实世界的历史数据进行比较。我们期望blinatumomab与历史上的传统化疗相比有更好的结果。设计:我们使用天主教血液病医院的真实数据进行了回顾性研究。方法:连续197例R/R BCP-ALL患者均采用常规化疗(113例)或布利纳单抗治疗(84例),布利纳单抗于2016年底上市。如果有供体,达到CR的患者接受同种异体hct。我们使用年龄、CR持续时间、细胞遗传学、既往同种异体hct和历史组和blinatumumab之间的挽救线等5个标准进行了倾向评分匹配队列分析。结果:每个队列包括52例患者。在blinatumomab组中,CR率更高(80.8%比53.8%,p = 0.006),更多的患者进行了allo-HCT(80.8%比46.2%,p比1.9%,p p = 0.004)。结论:匹配队列分析显示,与常规化疗相比,blinatumomab的疗效更好。然而,大量的复发和非复发死亡率继续发生,即使在布利纳单抗之后,再加上同种异体移植。R/R BCP-ALL仍需新的治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Superior survival outcome of blinatumomab compared with conventional chemotherapy for adult patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a propensity score-matched cohort analysis.

Superior survival outcome of blinatumomab compared with conventional chemotherapy for adult patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a propensity score-matched cohort analysis.

Superior survival outcome of blinatumomab compared with conventional chemotherapy for adult patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a propensity score-matched cohort analysis.

Superior survival outcome of blinatumomab compared with conventional chemotherapy for adult patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a propensity score-matched cohort analysis.

Background: Blinatumomab showed a higher complete remission (CR) rate and a safe bridging to allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) in adults with relapsed or refractory B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R BCP-ALL).

Objectives: We tried to analyze the outcome of blinatumomab compared with the real-world historical data. We expected superior outcome of blinatumomab compared with historical conventional chemotherapy.

Design: We conducted a retrospective study using real-world data in the Catholic Hematology Hospital.

Methods: Total 197 consecutive cases of R/R BCP-ALL were treated with conventional chemotherapy (n = 113) or blinatumomab, which was available since late 2016 (n = 84). Patients who achieved CR underwent allo-HCT if donor was available. We conducted a propensity score-matched cohort analysis using 5 criteria of age, CR duration, cytogenetics, previous allo-HCT, and salvage lines between historical group and blinatumomab.

Results: Each cohort consisted of 52 patients. In blinatumomab group, CR rate was higher (80.8% versus 53.8%, p = 0.006) and more patients proceeded to allo-HCT (80.8% versus 46.2%, p < 0.001). Among the CR patients with available minimal residual disease (MRD) results, 68.6% in blinatumomab group and 40.0% in conventional chemotherapy group were MRD-negative. Regimen-related mortality during the chemotherapy cycles was significantly higher in the conventional chemotherapy group (40.4% versus 1.9%, p < 0.001). Estimated 3-year overall survival (OS) was 33.2% (median, 26.3 months) after blinatumomab, and 15.4% (median, 8.2 months) after conventional chemotherapy (p < 0.001). Estimated 3-year non-relapse mortality were 30.3% and 51.9% (p = 0.004), respectively. In multivariate analysis, CR duration < 12 months showed more relapses and poor OS, and conventional chemotherapy showed higher non-relapse mortality and poor OS.

Conclusions: Matched cohort analysis showed superior outcomes of blinatumomab compared with conventional chemotherapy. However, large numbers of relapses and non-relapse mortalities continue to occur even after blinatumomab followed by allo-HCT. Novel therapeutic strategies are still needed for R/R BCP-ALL.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Hematology delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies across all areas of hematology. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in hematology, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信