连续放血在成人钝性实体器官损伤治疗中的作用。

Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.1097/JTN.0000000000000718
Mohammad A Frotan, Philip Edmundson, Christopher Cooper, Brian Tibbs, Laura Garlow, Kaeli Vandertulip, Amy Miller, Subhash Aryal, Jacob W Roden-Foreman, G Tom Shires
{"title":"连续放血在成人钝性实体器官损伤治疗中的作用。","authors":"Mohammad A Frotan,&nbsp;Philip Edmundson,&nbsp;Christopher Cooper,&nbsp;Brian Tibbs,&nbsp;Laura Garlow,&nbsp;Kaeli Vandertulip,&nbsp;Amy Miller,&nbsp;Subhash Aryal,&nbsp;Jacob W Roden-Foreman,&nbsp;G Tom Shires","doi":"10.1097/JTN.0000000000000718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The management of blunt spleen and liver trauma has become increasingly nonoperative. There is no consensus on timing or duration of serial hemoglobin and hematocrit monitoring in this patient population.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study examined the clinical utility of serial hemoglobin and hematocrit monitoring. We hypothesized that most interventions occur early in the hospital course, based on hemodynamic instability or physical examination findings rather than serial monitoring.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult trauma patients with blunt spleen or liver injury from November 2014 through June 2019 at our Level II trauma center. Interventions were classified as no intervention, surgical intervention, angioembolization, or packed red blood cell transfusion. Demographics, length of stay, total blood draws, laboratory values, and clinical triggers preceding intervention were reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 143 patients were studied, of whom 73 (51%) received no intervention, 47 (33%) received an intervention within 4 hr of presentation, and 23 (16%) had interventions beyond 4 hr. Of these 23 patients, 13 received an intervention based on phlebotomy results alone. Most of these patients (n = 12, 92%) received blood transfusion without further intervention. Only one patient underwent operative intervention based on serial hemoglobin results on hospital day 2.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The majority of patients with these injury patterns either require no intervention or declare themselves promptly after arrival. Serial phlebotomy after initial triage and intervention may add little value in the management of blunt solid organ injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":"30 3","pages":"135-141"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Role of Serial Phlebotomy in the Management of Blunt Solid Organ Injury in Adults.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad A Frotan,&nbsp;Philip Edmundson,&nbsp;Christopher Cooper,&nbsp;Brian Tibbs,&nbsp;Laura Garlow,&nbsp;Kaeli Vandertulip,&nbsp;Amy Miller,&nbsp;Subhash Aryal,&nbsp;Jacob W Roden-Foreman,&nbsp;G Tom Shires\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JTN.0000000000000718\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The management of blunt spleen and liver trauma has become increasingly nonoperative. There is no consensus on timing or duration of serial hemoglobin and hematocrit monitoring in this patient population.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study examined the clinical utility of serial hemoglobin and hematocrit monitoring. We hypothesized that most interventions occur early in the hospital course, based on hemodynamic instability or physical examination findings rather than serial monitoring.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult trauma patients with blunt spleen or liver injury from November 2014 through June 2019 at our Level II trauma center. Interventions were classified as no intervention, surgical intervention, angioembolization, or packed red blood cell transfusion. Demographics, length of stay, total blood draws, laboratory values, and clinical triggers preceding intervention were reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 143 patients were studied, of whom 73 (51%) received no intervention, 47 (33%) received an intervention within 4 hr of presentation, and 23 (16%) had interventions beyond 4 hr. Of these 23 patients, 13 received an intervention based on phlebotomy results alone. Most of these patients (n = 12, 92%) received blood transfusion without further intervention. Only one patient underwent operative intervention based on serial hemoglobin results on hospital day 2.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The majority of patients with these injury patterns either require no intervention or declare themselves promptly after arrival. Serial phlebotomy after initial triage and intervention may add little value in the management of blunt solid organ injury.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":\"30 3\",\"pages\":\"135-141\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JTN.0000000000000718\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JTN.0000000000000718","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:钝性脾和肝外伤的非手术治疗越来越普遍。在这类患者中,对血红蛋白和红细胞压积监测的时间和持续时间尚无共识。目的:探讨血红蛋白和红细胞压积系列监测的临床应用价值。我们假设大多数干预措施发生在住院过程的早期,基于血流动力学不稳定或体检结果,而不是连续监测。方法:我们对2014年11月至2019年6月在我们二级创伤中心的成人钝性脾或肝损伤患者进行了回顾性队列研究。干预措施分为不干预、手术干预、血管栓塞或填充红细胞输注。回顾了干预前的人口统计、住院时间、总抽血量、实验室值和临床触发因素。结果:共研究143例患者,其中73例(51%)未接受干预,47例(33%)在就诊后4小时内接受了干预,23例(16%)在4小时后接受了干预。在这23例患者中,13例接受了仅基于放血结果的干预。这些患者中的大多数(n = 12,92%)在没有进一步干预的情况下接受了输血。只有1例患者在住院第2天根据血红蛋白序列结果进行了手术干预。结论:这些损伤类型的患者大多数不需要干预或在到达后立即声明自己。经初步分诊和干预后的连续静脉切开术对钝性实体器官损伤的治疗价值不大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享
查看原文
Role of Serial Phlebotomy in the Management of Blunt Solid Organ Injury in Adults.

Background: The management of blunt spleen and liver trauma has become increasingly nonoperative. There is no consensus on timing or duration of serial hemoglobin and hematocrit monitoring in this patient population.

Objective: This study examined the clinical utility of serial hemoglobin and hematocrit monitoring. We hypothesized that most interventions occur early in the hospital course, based on hemodynamic instability or physical examination findings rather than serial monitoring.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult trauma patients with blunt spleen or liver injury from November 2014 through June 2019 at our Level II trauma center. Interventions were classified as no intervention, surgical intervention, angioembolization, or packed red blood cell transfusion. Demographics, length of stay, total blood draws, laboratory values, and clinical triggers preceding intervention were reviewed.

Results: A total of 143 patients were studied, of whom 73 (51%) received no intervention, 47 (33%) received an intervention within 4 hr of presentation, and 23 (16%) had interventions beyond 4 hr. Of these 23 patients, 13 received an intervention based on phlebotomy results alone. Most of these patients (n = 12, 92%) received blood transfusion without further intervention. Only one patient underwent operative intervention based on serial hemoglobin results on hospital day 2.

Conclusion: The majority of patients with these injury patterns either require no intervention or declare themselves promptly after arrival. Serial phlebotomy after initial triage and intervention may add little value in the management of blunt solid organ injury.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信