共同开发和评估在Twitter上减少痴呆症误解的运动:机器学习研究。

IF 3.5 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
JMIR infodemiology Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI:10.2196/36871
Sinan Erturk, Georgie Hudson, Sonja M Jansli, Daniel Morris, Clarissa M Odoi, Emma Wilson, Angela Clayton-Turner, Vanessa Bray, Gill Yourston, Andrew Cornwall, Nicholas Cummins, Til Wykes, Sagar Jilka
{"title":"共同开发和评估在Twitter上减少痴呆症误解的运动:机器学习研究。","authors":"Sinan Erturk,&nbsp;Georgie Hudson,&nbsp;Sonja M Jansli,&nbsp;Daniel Morris,&nbsp;Clarissa M Odoi,&nbsp;Emma Wilson,&nbsp;Angela Clayton-Turner,&nbsp;Vanessa Bray,&nbsp;Gill Yourston,&nbsp;Andrew Cornwall,&nbsp;Nicholas Cummins,&nbsp;Til Wykes,&nbsp;Sagar Jilka","doi":"10.2196/36871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dementia misconceptions on Twitter can have detrimental or harmful effects. Machine learning (ML) models codeveloped with carers provide a method to identify these and help in evaluating awareness campaigns.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to develop an ML model to distinguish between misconceptions and neutral tweets and to develop, deploy, and evaluate an awareness campaign to tackle dementia misconceptions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Taking 1414 tweets rated by carers from our previous work, we built 4 ML models. Using a 5-fold cross-validation, we evaluated them and performed a further blind validation with carers for the best 2 ML models; from this blind validation, we selected the best model overall. We codeveloped an awareness campaign and collected pre-post campaign tweets (N=4880), classifying them with our model as misconceptions or not. We analyzed dementia tweets from the United Kingdom across the campaign period (N=7124) to investigate how current events influenced misconception prevalence during this time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A random forest model best identified misconceptions with an accuracy of 82% from blind validation and found that 37% of the UK tweets (N=7124) about dementia across the campaign period were misconceptions. From this, we could track how the prevalence of misconceptions changed in response to top news stories in the United Kingdom. Misconceptions significantly rose around political topics and were highest (22/28, 79% of the dementia tweets) when there was controversy over the UK government allowing to continue hunting during the COVID-19 pandemic. After our campaign, there was no significant change in the prevalence of misconceptions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Through codevelopment with carers, we developed an accurate ML model to predict misconceptions in dementia tweets. Our awareness campaign was ineffective, but similar campaigns could be enhanced through ML to respond to current events that affect misconceptions in real time.</p>","PeriodicalId":73554,"journal":{"name":"JMIR infodemiology","volume":"2 2","pages":"e36871"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9987190/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Codeveloping and Evaluating a Campaign to Reduce Dementia Misconceptions on Twitter: Machine Learning Study.\",\"authors\":\"Sinan Erturk,&nbsp;Georgie Hudson,&nbsp;Sonja M Jansli,&nbsp;Daniel Morris,&nbsp;Clarissa M Odoi,&nbsp;Emma Wilson,&nbsp;Angela Clayton-Turner,&nbsp;Vanessa Bray,&nbsp;Gill Yourston,&nbsp;Andrew Cornwall,&nbsp;Nicholas Cummins,&nbsp;Til Wykes,&nbsp;Sagar Jilka\",\"doi\":\"10.2196/36871\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dementia misconceptions on Twitter can have detrimental or harmful effects. Machine learning (ML) models codeveloped with carers provide a method to identify these and help in evaluating awareness campaigns.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to develop an ML model to distinguish between misconceptions and neutral tweets and to develop, deploy, and evaluate an awareness campaign to tackle dementia misconceptions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Taking 1414 tweets rated by carers from our previous work, we built 4 ML models. Using a 5-fold cross-validation, we evaluated them and performed a further blind validation with carers for the best 2 ML models; from this blind validation, we selected the best model overall. We codeveloped an awareness campaign and collected pre-post campaign tweets (N=4880), classifying them with our model as misconceptions or not. We analyzed dementia tweets from the United Kingdom across the campaign period (N=7124) to investigate how current events influenced misconception prevalence during this time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A random forest model best identified misconceptions with an accuracy of 82% from blind validation and found that 37% of the UK tweets (N=7124) about dementia across the campaign period were misconceptions. From this, we could track how the prevalence of misconceptions changed in response to top news stories in the United Kingdom. Misconceptions significantly rose around political topics and were highest (22/28, 79% of the dementia tweets) when there was controversy over the UK government allowing to continue hunting during the COVID-19 pandemic. After our campaign, there was no significant change in the prevalence of misconceptions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Through codevelopment with carers, we developed an accurate ML model to predict misconceptions in dementia tweets. Our awareness campaign was ineffective, but similar campaigns could be enhanced through ML to respond to current events that affect misconceptions in real time.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73554,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JMIR infodemiology\",\"volume\":\"2 2\",\"pages\":\"e36871\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9987190/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JMIR infodemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2196/36871\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR infodemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/36871","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:Twitter上对痴呆症的误解可能会产生有害或有害的影响。与护理人员共同开发的机器学习(ML)模型提供了一种识别这些问题的方法,并有助于评估宣传活动。目的:本研究旨在开发一个ML模型来区分误解和中性推文,并开发、部署和评估一项解决痴呆症误解的宣传活动。方法:从我们之前的工作中提取1414条由护理人员评分的推文,我们建立了4个ML模型。使用5倍交叉验证,我们对它们进行了评估,并与护理人员进行了进一步的盲验证,以获得最佳的2ml模型;从这个盲验证中,我们选择了最好的模型。我们共同开发了一个宣传活动,并收集了活动前的推文(N=4880),用我们的模型将它们分类为误解或非误解。我们分析了整个竞选期间来自英国的痴呆症推文(N=7124),以调查当前事件如何影响这段时间的误解流行。结果:随机森林模型通过盲法验证以82%的准确率最好地识别了误解,并发现在整个竞选期间,37%关于痴呆症的英国推文(N=7124)是误解。由此,我们可以追踪误解的普遍程度是如何随着英国的头条新闻而变化的。围绕政治话题的误解显著增加,当英国政府在COVID-19大流行期间允许继续狩猎存在争议时,误解最高(22/28,占痴呆症推文的79%)。在我们的竞选活动之后,普遍存在的误解并没有显著改变。结论:通过与护理人员共同开发,我们开发了一个准确的ML模型来预测痴呆症推文中的误解。我们的宣传活动是无效的,但类似的活动可以通过ML来增强,以实时响应影响误解的当前事件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Codeveloping and Evaluating a Campaign to Reduce Dementia Misconceptions on Twitter: Machine Learning Study.

Codeveloping and Evaluating a Campaign to Reduce Dementia Misconceptions on Twitter: Machine Learning Study.

Codeveloping and Evaluating a Campaign to Reduce Dementia Misconceptions on Twitter: Machine Learning Study.

Codeveloping and Evaluating a Campaign to Reduce Dementia Misconceptions on Twitter: Machine Learning Study.

Background: Dementia misconceptions on Twitter can have detrimental or harmful effects. Machine learning (ML) models codeveloped with carers provide a method to identify these and help in evaluating awareness campaigns.

Objective: This study aimed to develop an ML model to distinguish between misconceptions and neutral tweets and to develop, deploy, and evaluate an awareness campaign to tackle dementia misconceptions.

Methods: Taking 1414 tweets rated by carers from our previous work, we built 4 ML models. Using a 5-fold cross-validation, we evaluated them and performed a further blind validation with carers for the best 2 ML models; from this blind validation, we selected the best model overall. We codeveloped an awareness campaign and collected pre-post campaign tweets (N=4880), classifying them with our model as misconceptions or not. We analyzed dementia tweets from the United Kingdom across the campaign period (N=7124) to investigate how current events influenced misconception prevalence during this time.

Results: A random forest model best identified misconceptions with an accuracy of 82% from blind validation and found that 37% of the UK tweets (N=7124) about dementia across the campaign period were misconceptions. From this, we could track how the prevalence of misconceptions changed in response to top news stories in the United Kingdom. Misconceptions significantly rose around political topics and were highest (22/28, 79% of the dementia tweets) when there was controversy over the UK government allowing to continue hunting during the COVID-19 pandemic. After our campaign, there was no significant change in the prevalence of misconceptions.

Conclusions: Through codevelopment with carers, we developed an accurate ML model to predict misconceptions in dementia tweets. Our awareness campaign was ineffective, but similar campaigns could be enhanced through ML to respond to current events that affect misconceptions in real time.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信