热粘性和声波填充激活体填充复合修复体的临床评价。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
American journal of dentistry Pub Date : 2023-04-01
Kholood E Morsy, Mirvat M Salama, Thuraia M Genaid
{"title":"热粘性和声波填充激活体填充复合修复体的临床评价。","authors":"Kholood E Morsy,&nbsp;Mirvat M Salama,&nbsp;Thuraia M Genaid","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the clinical performance of VisCalor and SonicFill versus the conventionally applied bulk fill composite restorations in Class I cavities over 18-month follow-up periods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>60 posterior teeth were used in this study in 20 patients (age ranging from 25-40). They were randomly divided into three equal groups (n=20) based on the type of restorative material employed. Each resin composite restorative system with the recommended manufacturer's adhesive was applied and cured according to the manufacturer's instructions. All restorations were evaluated clinically at baseline (after 24 hours), 6, 12, and 18 months according to the modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) by two examiners for retention, marginal adaptation, marginal discoloration, secondary caries, postoperative sensitivity, color match, and anatomical form.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All tested groups exhibited no significant difference regarding all the clinical evaluation criteria at all evaluation periods, except for marginal adaptation and discoloration. Marginal changes (Bravo score) were detected only after 12 months in 15% of Filtek bulk fill restorations (Group 1) only while all VisCalor bulk fill restorations in Group 2 and SonicFill 2 restorations in Group 3 recorded 100% Alpha scoring, with no statistically significant difference among the groups (P= 0.050). After 18 months, Bravo scores increased to 30% in Group 1, while 5 and 10% Bravo scores were recorded in restorations of Groups 2 and 3, respectively with a statistically significant difference (P= 0.049) among them. Marginal discoloration was observed after 12 months in Group 1 only, however, no statistically significant difference was found among the groups (P= 0.126). At 18 months, all tested groups had a statistically significant difference between them (P= 0.027).</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Reducing the composite viscosity either by thermo-viscous technology or by sonic activation can improve the material adaptation to the cavity walls and margins, thus improving the clinical performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":7538,"journal":{"name":"American journal of dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical evaluation of thermo-viscous and sonic fill-activated bulk fill composite restorations.\",\"authors\":\"Kholood E Morsy,&nbsp;Mirvat M Salama,&nbsp;Thuraia M Genaid\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the clinical performance of VisCalor and SonicFill versus the conventionally applied bulk fill composite restorations in Class I cavities over 18-month follow-up periods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>60 posterior teeth were used in this study in 20 patients (age ranging from 25-40). They were randomly divided into three equal groups (n=20) based on the type of restorative material employed. Each resin composite restorative system with the recommended manufacturer's adhesive was applied and cured according to the manufacturer's instructions. All restorations were evaluated clinically at baseline (after 24 hours), 6, 12, and 18 months according to the modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) by two examiners for retention, marginal adaptation, marginal discoloration, secondary caries, postoperative sensitivity, color match, and anatomical form.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All tested groups exhibited no significant difference regarding all the clinical evaluation criteria at all evaluation periods, except for marginal adaptation and discoloration. Marginal changes (Bravo score) were detected only after 12 months in 15% of Filtek bulk fill restorations (Group 1) only while all VisCalor bulk fill restorations in Group 2 and SonicFill 2 restorations in Group 3 recorded 100% Alpha scoring, with no statistically significant difference among the groups (P= 0.050). After 18 months, Bravo scores increased to 30% in Group 1, while 5 and 10% Bravo scores were recorded in restorations of Groups 2 and 3, respectively with a statistically significant difference (P= 0.049) among them. Marginal discoloration was observed after 12 months in Group 1 only, however, no statistically significant difference was found among the groups (P= 0.126). At 18 months, all tested groups had a statistically significant difference between them (P= 0.027).</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Reducing the composite viscosity either by thermo-viscous technology or by sonic activation can improve the material adaptation to the cavity walls and margins, thus improving the clinical performance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7538,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of dentistry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:通过18个月的随访,评估VisCalor和SonicFill与传统填充体复合修复体在I类牙槽中的临床表现。方法:采用60颗后牙对20例患者(年龄25 ~ 40岁)进行研究。根据采用的修复材料类型,将患者随机分为三组(n=20)。每个树脂复合修复系统与推荐的制造商的粘合剂应用和固化根据制造商的说明。所有修复体在基线(24小时后)、6、12和18个月时进行临床评估,根据修改后的美国公共卫生服务(USPHS),由两名检查人员对固位、边缘适应、边缘变色、继发龋齿、术后敏感性、颜色匹配和解剖形态进行评估。结果:除边缘适应和变色外,各组在所有评估期的临床评价指标均无显著差异。只有15%的Filtek散装填充修复体(组1)在12个月后才检测到边际变化(Bravo评分),而VisCalor散装填充修复体(组2)和SonicFill 2修复体(组3)的Alpha评分均为100%,组间差异无统计学意义(P= 0.050)。18个月后,第1组的Bravo评分提高到30%,第2组和第3组的Bravo评分分别为5%和10%,差异有统计学意义(P= 0.049)。1组仅在12个月后出现边缘变色,组间差异无统计学意义(P= 0.126)。18个月时,各组间差异有统计学意义(P= 0.027)。临床意义:通过热粘技术或声波激活降低复合黏度,可以提高材料对腔壁和腔缘的适应性,从而提高临床性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical evaluation of thermo-viscous and sonic fill-activated bulk fill composite restorations.

Purpose: To evaluate the clinical performance of VisCalor and SonicFill versus the conventionally applied bulk fill composite restorations in Class I cavities over 18-month follow-up periods.

Methods: 60 posterior teeth were used in this study in 20 patients (age ranging from 25-40). They were randomly divided into three equal groups (n=20) based on the type of restorative material employed. Each resin composite restorative system with the recommended manufacturer's adhesive was applied and cured according to the manufacturer's instructions. All restorations were evaluated clinically at baseline (after 24 hours), 6, 12, and 18 months according to the modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) by two examiners for retention, marginal adaptation, marginal discoloration, secondary caries, postoperative sensitivity, color match, and anatomical form.

Results: All tested groups exhibited no significant difference regarding all the clinical evaluation criteria at all evaluation periods, except for marginal adaptation and discoloration. Marginal changes (Bravo score) were detected only after 12 months in 15% of Filtek bulk fill restorations (Group 1) only while all VisCalor bulk fill restorations in Group 2 and SonicFill 2 restorations in Group 3 recorded 100% Alpha scoring, with no statistically significant difference among the groups (P= 0.050). After 18 months, Bravo scores increased to 30% in Group 1, while 5 and 10% Bravo scores were recorded in restorations of Groups 2 and 3, respectively with a statistically significant difference (P= 0.049) among them. Marginal discoloration was observed after 12 months in Group 1 only, however, no statistically significant difference was found among the groups (P= 0.126). At 18 months, all tested groups had a statistically significant difference between them (P= 0.027).

Clinical significance: Reducing the composite viscosity either by thermo-viscous technology or by sonic activation can improve the material adaptation to the cavity walls and margins, thus improving the clinical performance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of dentistry
American journal of dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
57
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Dentistry, published by Mosher & Linder, Inc., provides peer-reviewed scientific articles with clinical significance for the general dental practitioner.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信