儿童牙科麻醉用无针麻醉聚合物装置:一项随机临床试验。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
American journal of dentistry Pub Date : 2023-04-01
Giselle C Inácio, Vinicius Pedrazzi, Osvaldo de Freitas, Maíra P F Duarte, Raquel A B de Silva, Paulo Nelson-Filho, Francisco Wanderley G de Paula Silva, Fabrício K de Carvalho, Marilla P Lucisano, Alexandra M de Queiroz
{"title":"儿童牙科麻醉用无针麻醉聚合物装置:一项随机临床试验。","authors":"Giselle C Inácio,&nbsp;Vinicius Pedrazzi,&nbsp;Osvaldo de Freitas,&nbsp;Maíra P F Duarte,&nbsp;Raquel A B de Silva,&nbsp;Paulo Nelson-Filho,&nbsp;Francisco Wanderley G de Paula Silva,&nbsp;Fabrício K de Carvalho,&nbsp;Marilla P Lucisano,&nbsp;Alexandra M de Queiroz","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate efficacy of an anesthetic mucoadhesive film with a polymeric device (PD) in promoting anesthesia compared to conventional local infiltration (LA) in children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>50 children aged 6-10 years (both genders) needing similar procedures on homologous teeth on the maxilla were included. The parents and children were asked about perception of dental treatment. The child's heart rate per minute (bpm) and blood pressure were evaluated before and after each anesthetic technique (AT) procedure. Anesthesia efficacy was measured by reporting pain using Wong-Baker Faces Scale. Children's behavior and AT preferences were also evaluated. Paired T-test, chi-square and Wilcoxon test were used for statistical comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fear of anesthesia was reported by 50% of caregivers and by 66% of children. No difference was observed in systolic (P= 0.282) and diastolic (P= 0.251) blood pressure, comparing both AT. Difference was observed regarding the child's behavior when the PD was used (P= 0.0028). Evaluating the face scale, 74% of the children selected the \"no pain\" (face 0) (P< 0.0001) for PD, and 26% for LA. PD was preferred by 86% of children. Only 20% of the PD anesthesia needed to be complemented by LA.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>The polymeric device presented promising results since most children did not report pain and dental procedures could be performed without local infiltration.</p>","PeriodicalId":7538,"journal":{"name":"American journal of dentistry","volume":"36 2","pages":"69-74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Needle-free anesthetic polymeric device for dental anesthesia in children: A randomized clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Giselle C Inácio,&nbsp;Vinicius Pedrazzi,&nbsp;Osvaldo de Freitas,&nbsp;Maíra P F Duarte,&nbsp;Raquel A B de Silva,&nbsp;Paulo Nelson-Filho,&nbsp;Francisco Wanderley G de Paula Silva,&nbsp;Fabrício K de Carvalho,&nbsp;Marilla P Lucisano,&nbsp;Alexandra M de Queiroz\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate efficacy of an anesthetic mucoadhesive film with a polymeric device (PD) in promoting anesthesia compared to conventional local infiltration (LA) in children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>50 children aged 6-10 years (both genders) needing similar procedures on homologous teeth on the maxilla were included. The parents and children were asked about perception of dental treatment. The child's heart rate per minute (bpm) and blood pressure were evaluated before and after each anesthetic technique (AT) procedure. Anesthesia efficacy was measured by reporting pain using Wong-Baker Faces Scale. Children's behavior and AT preferences were also evaluated. Paired T-test, chi-square and Wilcoxon test were used for statistical comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fear of anesthesia was reported by 50% of caregivers and by 66% of children. No difference was observed in systolic (P= 0.282) and diastolic (P= 0.251) blood pressure, comparing both AT. Difference was observed regarding the child's behavior when the PD was used (P= 0.0028). Evaluating the face scale, 74% of the children selected the \\\"no pain\\\" (face 0) (P< 0.0001) for PD, and 26% for LA. PD was preferred by 86% of children. Only 20% of the PD anesthesia needed to be complemented by LA.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>The polymeric device presented promising results since most children did not report pain and dental procedures could be performed without local infiltration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7538,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of dentistry\",\"volume\":\"36 2\",\"pages\":\"69-74\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价聚合装置(PD)麻醉黏合剂膜与常规局部浸润(LA)在儿童麻醉中的促进作用。方法:选取50例6 ~ 10岁的儿童(男女),对上颌同种牙进行类似手术。父母和孩子被问及对牙科治疗的看法。在每次麻醉技术(AT)之前和之后评估儿童每分钟心率(bpm)和血压。采用Wong-Baker面部量表报告疼痛,以评估麻醉效果。儿童的行为和AT偏好也被评估。统计学比较采用配对t检验、卡方检验和Wilcoxon检验。结果:50%的护理人员和66%的儿童报告了麻醉恐惧。两组患者的收缩压(P= 0.282)和舒张压(P= 0.251)比较无显著差异。当使用PD时,观察到儿童行为的差异(P= 0.0028)。在评估面部量表时,74%的儿童选择PD为“无疼痛”(面部0)(P< 0.0001),而LA为26%。86%的儿童首选PD。只有20%的PD麻醉需要辅以LA。临床意义:由于大多数儿童没有报告疼痛,并且牙科手术可以在没有局部浸润的情况下进行,因此聚合物装置显示了令人满意的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Needle-free anesthetic polymeric device for dental anesthesia in children: A randomized clinical trial.

Purpose: To evaluate efficacy of an anesthetic mucoadhesive film with a polymeric device (PD) in promoting anesthesia compared to conventional local infiltration (LA) in children.

Methods: 50 children aged 6-10 years (both genders) needing similar procedures on homologous teeth on the maxilla were included. The parents and children were asked about perception of dental treatment. The child's heart rate per minute (bpm) and blood pressure were evaluated before and after each anesthetic technique (AT) procedure. Anesthesia efficacy was measured by reporting pain using Wong-Baker Faces Scale. Children's behavior and AT preferences were also evaluated. Paired T-test, chi-square and Wilcoxon test were used for statistical comparisons.

Results: Fear of anesthesia was reported by 50% of caregivers and by 66% of children. No difference was observed in systolic (P= 0.282) and diastolic (P= 0.251) blood pressure, comparing both AT. Difference was observed regarding the child's behavior when the PD was used (P= 0.0028). Evaluating the face scale, 74% of the children selected the "no pain" (face 0) (P< 0.0001) for PD, and 26% for LA. PD was preferred by 86% of children. Only 20% of the PD anesthesia needed to be complemented by LA.

Clinical significance: The polymeric device presented promising results since most children did not report pain and dental procedures could be performed without local infiltration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of dentistry
American journal of dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
57
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Dentistry, published by Mosher & Linder, Inc., provides peer-reviewed scientific articles with clinical significance for the general dental practitioner.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信