规划靶体的凹凸角可作为脑肿瘤调强放疗或三维适形放疗技术的选择标准。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Meenu Gupta, Ravi Kant, Viney Kumar, Manju Saini, Vipul Nautiyal, Kallol Bhadra, Mushtaq Ahmad
{"title":"规划靶体的凹凸角可作为脑肿瘤调强放疗或三维适形放疗技术的选择标准。","authors":"Meenu Gupta,&nbsp;Ravi Kant,&nbsp;Viney Kumar,&nbsp;Manju Saini,&nbsp;Vipul Nautiyal,&nbsp;Kallol Bhadra,&nbsp;Mushtaq Ahmad","doi":"10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_1528_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>With innovation of medical imaging, radiotherapy attempts to conform the high dose region to the planning target volume (PTV). The present work aimed to assess the angle of concavity in PTV can be adopted as selection criteria for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) technique in Brain tumors.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Thirty previously irradiated patients with brain tumors were replanned with both 3DCRT and IMRT technique. Angle of concavity (dip) in the PTV near the organs at risk was measured in the contoured structure set images of each patient. These cases were divided into three groups where angles were 0°, >120° and <120°. Dose of 60 Gy/30# was fixed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In Group 1, the IMRT plan had better TV95% as compared to 3DCRT respectively with significant P value (P = 0.002). Mean of conformity index (CI) and Homogeneity Index (HI) were comparable. For Group 2 (angle >120°), the IMRT plan had better TV95% as compared to 3DCRT respectively with a significant P value (P = 0.021). HI and CI were not significant. For Group 3 (<120°), IMRT plan had better TV95% as compared to 3DCRT respectively with a significant P value (P = 0.001). HI and CI were better in IMRT arm with significant P value.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results from this study showed that the angle of concavity can be considered as an additional objective tool for selection criteria whether tumor can be treated with IMRT or 3DCRT. Tumors where angle of concavity was <120°, HI and CI provided more uniformity and conformity of dose distribution inside PTV with significant P values.</p>","PeriodicalId":15208,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cancer research and therapeutics","volume":"19 Supplement","pages":"S41-S46"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Angle of concavity in planning target volume can be adopted as selection criteria for intensity-modulated radiation therapy or three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy technique in brain tumors.\",\"authors\":\"Meenu Gupta,&nbsp;Ravi Kant,&nbsp;Viney Kumar,&nbsp;Manju Saini,&nbsp;Vipul Nautiyal,&nbsp;Kallol Bhadra,&nbsp;Mushtaq Ahmad\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_1528_21\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>With innovation of medical imaging, radiotherapy attempts to conform the high dose region to the planning target volume (PTV). The present work aimed to assess the angle of concavity in PTV can be adopted as selection criteria for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) technique in Brain tumors.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Thirty previously irradiated patients with brain tumors were replanned with both 3DCRT and IMRT technique. Angle of concavity (dip) in the PTV near the organs at risk was measured in the contoured structure set images of each patient. These cases were divided into three groups where angles were 0°, >120° and <120°. Dose of 60 Gy/30# was fixed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In Group 1, the IMRT plan had better TV95% as compared to 3DCRT respectively with significant P value (P = 0.002). Mean of conformity index (CI) and Homogeneity Index (HI) were comparable. For Group 2 (angle >120°), the IMRT plan had better TV95% as compared to 3DCRT respectively with a significant P value (P = 0.021). HI and CI were not significant. For Group 3 (<120°), IMRT plan had better TV95% as compared to 3DCRT respectively with a significant P value (P = 0.001). HI and CI were better in IMRT arm with significant P value.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results from this study showed that the angle of concavity can be considered as an additional objective tool for selection criteria whether tumor can be treated with IMRT or 3DCRT. Tumors where angle of concavity was <120°, HI and CI provided more uniformity and conformity of dose distribution inside PTV with significant P values.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15208,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cancer research and therapeutics\",\"volume\":\"19 Supplement\",\"pages\":\"S41-S46\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cancer research and therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_1528_21\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cancer research and therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_1528_21","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导论:随着医学影像学的创新,放射治疗试图将高剂量区与计划靶体积(PTV)相符合。本工作旨在评估PTV的凹角可作为脑肿瘤调强放疗(IMRT)或三维适形放疗(3DCRT)技术的选择标准。材料与方法:采用3DCRT和IMRT技术对30例既往放疗的脑肿瘤患者进行重新计划。在每位患者的轮廓结构集图像中测量危险器官附近PTV的凹角(倾角)。结果:第一组IMRT方案TV95%优于3DCRT方案,P值显著(P = 0.002);一致性指数(CI)和同质性指数(HI)的平均值具有可比性。2组(角度>120°)IMRT方案TV95%优于3DCRT方案,P值显著(P = 0.021)。HI和CI无显著性差异。结论:本研究结果表明,凹度角度可以作为肿瘤是否可以采用IMRT或3DCRT治疗的选择标准的另一个客观工具。凹角为的肿瘤
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Angle of concavity in planning target volume can be adopted as selection criteria for intensity-modulated radiation therapy or three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy technique in brain tumors.

Introduction: With innovation of medical imaging, radiotherapy attempts to conform the high dose region to the planning target volume (PTV). The present work aimed to assess the angle of concavity in PTV can be adopted as selection criteria for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) technique in Brain tumors.

Materials and methods: Thirty previously irradiated patients with brain tumors were replanned with both 3DCRT and IMRT technique. Angle of concavity (dip) in the PTV near the organs at risk was measured in the contoured structure set images of each patient. These cases were divided into three groups where angles were 0°, >120° and <120°. Dose of 60 Gy/30# was fixed.

Results: In Group 1, the IMRT plan had better TV95% as compared to 3DCRT respectively with significant P value (P = 0.002). Mean of conformity index (CI) and Homogeneity Index (HI) were comparable. For Group 2 (angle >120°), the IMRT plan had better TV95% as compared to 3DCRT respectively with a significant P value (P = 0.021). HI and CI were not significant. For Group 3 (<120°), IMRT plan had better TV95% as compared to 3DCRT respectively with a significant P value (P = 0.001). HI and CI were better in IMRT arm with significant P value.

Conclusion: The results from this study showed that the angle of concavity can be considered as an additional objective tool for selection criteria whether tumor can be treated with IMRT or 3DCRT. Tumors where angle of concavity was <120°, HI and CI provided more uniformity and conformity of dose distribution inside PTV with significant P values.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
15.40%
发文量
299
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The journal will cover technical and clinical studies related to health, ethical and social issues in field of Medical oncology, radiation oncology, medical imaging, radiation protection, non-ionising radiation, radiobiology. Articles with clinical interest and implications will be given preference.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信