基于 GPS 和自我报告的老年人生活空间移动能力的比较。

AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium Pub Date : 2023-04-29 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01
Chen Bai, Ruben Zapata, Yashaswi Karnati, Emily Smail, Alexandra M Hajduk, Thomas M Gill, Sanjay Ranka, Todd M Manini, Mamoun T Mardini
{"title":"基于 GPS 和自我报告的老年人生活空间移动能力的比较。","authors":"Chen Bai, Ruben Zapata, Yashaswi Karnati, Emily Smail, Alexandra M Hajduk, Thomas M Gill, Sanjay Ranka, Todd M Manini, Mamoun T Mardini","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Assessments of Life-space Mobility (LSM) evaluate the locations of movement and their frequency over a period of time to understand mobility patterns. Advancements in and miniaturization of GPS sensors in mobile devices like smartwatches could facilitate objective and high-resolution assessment of life-space mobility. The purpose of this study was to compare self-reported measures to GPS-based LSM extracted from 27 participants (44.4% female, aged 65+ years) who wore a smartwatch for 1-2 weeks at two different site locations (Connecticut and Florida). GPS features (e.g., excursion size/span) were compared to self-reported LSM with and without an indicator for needing assistance. Although correlations between self-reported measures and GPS-based LSM were positive, none were statistically significant. The correlations improved slightly when needing assistance was included, but statistical significance was achieved only for excursion size (r=0.40, P=0.04). The poor correlations between GPS-based and self-reported indicators suggest that they capture different dimensions of life-space mobility.</p>","PeriodicalId":72180,"journal":{"name":"AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10148377/pdf/1013.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparisons Between GPS-based and Self-reported Life-space Mobility in Older Adults.\",\"authors\":\"Chen Bai, Ruben Zapata, Yashaswi Karnati, Emily Smail, Alexandra M Hajduk, Thomas M Gill, Sanjay Ranka, Todd M Manini, Mamoun T Mardini\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Assessments of Life-space Mobility (LSM) evaluate the locations of movement and their frequency over a period of time to understand mobility patterns. Advancements in and miniaturization of GPS sensors in mobile devices like smartwatches could facilitate objective and high-resolution assessment of life-space mobility. The purpose of this study was to compare self-reported measures to GPS-based LSM extracted from 27 participants (44.4% female, aged 65+ years) who wore a smartwatch for 1-2 weeks at two different site locations (Connecticut and Florida). GPS features (e.g., excursion size/span) were compared to self-reported LSM with and without an indicator for needing assistance. Although correlations between self-reported measures and GPS-based LSM were positive, none were statistically significant. The correlations improved slightly when needing assistance was included, but statistical significance was achieved only for excursion size (r=0.40, P=0.04). The poor correlations between GPS-based and self-reported indicators suggest that they capture different dimensions of life-space mobility.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10148377/pdf/1013.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生命空间移动性评估(LSM)对一段时间内的移动地点及其频率进行评估,以了解移动模式。智能手表等移动设备中 GPS 传感器的进步和小型化有助于对生活空间移动性进行客观、高分辨率的评估。本研究的目的是将 27 名参与者(44.4% 为女性,年龄在 65 岁以上)在两个不同地点(康涅狄格州和佛罗里达州)佩戴智能手表 1-2 周后的自我报告测量结果与基于 GPS 的生活空间移动能力提取结果进行比较。将 GPS 特征(如远足大小/时间跨度)与自我报告的 LSM(有无需要帮助的指标)进行了比较。虽然自我报告的测量结果与基于 GPS 的 LSM 之间存在正相关,但在统计上都不显著。如果加入需要帮助的指标,相关性会略有提高,但只有偏移量(r=0.40,P=0.04)的相关性有统计学意义。基于全球定位系统的指标与自我报告指标之间的相关性较差,这表明它们捕捉到了生活空间移动性的不同方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparisons Between GPS-based and Self-reported Life-space Mobility in Older Adults.

Assessments of Life-space Mobility (LSM) evaluate the locations of movement and their frequency over a period of time to understand mobility patterns. Advancements in and miniaturization of GPS sensors in mobile devices like smartwatches could facilitate objective and high-resolution assessment of life-space mobility. The purpose of this study was to compare self-reported measures to GPS-based LSM extracted from 27 participants (44.4% female, aged 65+ years) who wore a smartwatch for 1-2 weeks at two different site locations (Connecticut and Florida). GPS features (e.g., excursion size/span) were compared to self-reported LSM with and without an indicator for needing assistance. Although correlations between self-reported measures and GPS-based LSM were positive, none were statistically significant. The correlations improved slightly when needing assistance was included, but statistical significance was achieved only for excursion size (r=0.40, P=0.04). The poor correlations between GPS-based and self-reported indicators suggest that they capture different dimensions of life-space mobility.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信