{"title":"血管内超声成像评价主动脉硬度:一项概念验证研究。","authors":"Niya Boykova Mileva, Dobrin Iotkov Vassilev","doi":"10.5603/CJ.a2021.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Aortic stiffness is a well-known cardio-vascular risk factor. For years, different methods have been studied in the assessment of aortic elastic properties and large arterial stiffness for risk stratification. Herein is an assessment of the role of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging for the evaluation of aortic elastic properties.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Intravascular ultrasound imaging of the aorta was performed in 12 patients with transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and computed tomography (CT) evidence for enlargement of the ascending aorta - diameter ≥ 40.0 mm. Mechanical properties of the aorta were derived from the measured diameters and intra-aortic pressure. Paired samples T-test analyses were performed to determine differences between measurements derived by TTE, CT and IVUS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean values of the calculated elastic properties via IVUS of the ascending aorta were as follows: compliance 0.021 ± 0.02; strain 205 ± 4.3; aortic stiffness index 4.3 ± 0.75; elastic modulus 0.31 ± 0.05. On paired T-test analysis maximum ascending aortic diameter measured by CT aortography and IVUS did not differ significantly (t = -0.19, p = 0.985), but a significant difference between IVUS measurements and TTE derived diameters was found (t = 13.118, p = 0.034). On average, IVUS diameters were 2.3 mm larger than the results acquired by TTE (95% confidence interval: 14.21-17.13).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Intravascular ultrasound examination of the ascending aorta provided larger diameters than the ones collected by means of TTE. However, IVUS measurements did not differ significantly from diameters derived by CT aortography.</p>","PeriodicalId":9492,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology journal","volume":"30 2","pages":"221-227"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/5a/da/cardj-30-2-221.PMC10129260.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intravascular ultrasound imaging in evaluation of aortic stiffness: A proof-of-concept study.\",\"authors\":\"Niya Boykova Mileva, Dobrin Iotkov Vassilev\",\"doi\":\"10.5603/CJ.a2021.0003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Aortic stiffness is a well-known cardio-vascular risk factor. For years, different methods have been studied in the assessment of aortic elastic properties and large arterial stiffness for risk stratification. Herein is an assessment of the role of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging for the evaluation of aortic elastic properties.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Intravascular ultrasound imaging of the aorta was performed in 12 patients with transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and computed tomography (CT) evidence for enlargement of the ascending aorta - diameter ≥ 40.0 mm. Mechanical properties of the aorta were derived from the measured diameters and intra-aortic pressure. Paired samples T-test analyses were performed to determine differences between measurements derived by TTE, CT and IVUS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean values of the calculated elastic properties via IVUS of the ascending aorta were as follows: compliance 0.021 ± 0.02; strain 205 ± 4.3; aortic stiffness index 4.3 ± 0.75; elastic modulus 0.31 ± 0.05. On paired T-test analysis maximum ascending aortic diameter measured by CT aortography and IVUS did not differ significantly (t = -0.19, p = 0.985), but a significant difference between IVUS measurements and TTE derived diameters was found (t = 13.118, p = 0.034). On average, IVUS diameters were 2.3 mm larger than the results acquired by TTE (95% confidence interval: 14.21-17.13).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Intravascular ultrasound examination of the ascending aorta provided larger diameters than the ones collected by means of TTE. However, IVUS measurements did not differ significantly from diameters derived by CT aortography.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9492,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiology journal\",\"volume\":\"30 2\",\"pages\":\"221-227\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/5a/da/cardj-30-2-221.PMC10129260.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiology journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5603/CJ.a2021.0003\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/CJ.a2021.0003","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:主动脉僵硬是众所周知的心血管危险因素。多年来,人们研究了不同的方法来评估主动脉弹性特性和大动脉硬度的风险分层。本文评估了血管内超声(IVUS)成像在主动脉弹性特性评估中的作用。方法:对12例经胸超声心动图(TTE)和计算机断层扫描(CT)证实升主动脉扩大(直径≥40.0 mm)的患者行主动脉血管内超声显像。主动脉的力学性能由测量的直径和主动脉内压得出。进行配对样本t检验分析,以确定TTE、CT和IVUS测量结果之间的差异。结果:经IVUS计算的升主动脉弹性特性平均值为:顺应性0.021±0.02;菌株205±4.3;主动脉硬度指数4.3±0.75;弹性模量0.31±0.05。配对t检验分析显示,CT主动脉造影与IVUS测量的最大升主动脉内径无显著差异(t = -0.19, p = 0.985),但IVUS测量的最大升主动脉内径与TTE测量的最大升主动脉内径有显著差异(t = 13.118, p = 0.034)。IVUS直径比TTE测量结果平均大2.3 mm(95%可信区间:14.21-17.13)。结论:血管内超声检查所获得的升主动脉直径大于TTE检查所得的升主动脉直径。然而,IVUS测量值与CT主动脉造影术测量值没有明显差异。
Intravascular ultrasound imaging in evaluation of aortic stiffness: A proof-of-concept study.
Background: Aortic stiffness is a well-known cardio-vascular risk factor. For years, different methods have been studied in the assessment of aortic elastic properties and large arterial stiffness for risk stratification. Herein is an assessment of the role of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging for the evaluation of aortic elastic properties.
Methods: Intravascular ultrasound imaging of the aorta was performed in 12 patients with transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and computed tomography (CT) evidence for enlargement of the ascending aorta - diameter ≥ 40.0 mm. Mechanical properties of the aorta were derived from the measured diameters and intra-aortic pressure. Paired samples T-test analyses were performed to determine differences between measurements derived by TTE, CT and IVUS.
Results: Mean values of the calculated elastic properties via IVUS of the ascending aorta were as follows: compliance 0.021 ± 0.02; strain 205 ± 4.3; aortic stiffness index 4.3 ± 0.75; elastic modulus 0.31 ± 0.05. On paired T-test analysis maximum ascending aortic diameter measured by CT aortography and IVUS did not differ significantly (t = -0.19, p = 0.985), but a significant difference between IVUS measurements and TTE derived diameters was found (t = 13.118, p = 0.034). On average, IVUS diameters were 2.3 mm larger than the results acquired by TTE (95% confidence interval: 14.21-17.13).
Conclusions: Intravascular ultrasound examination of the ascending aorta provided larger diameters than the ones collected by means of TTE. However, IVUS measurements did not differ significantly from diameters derived by CT aortography.
期刊介绍:
Cardiology Journal is a scientific, peer-reviewed journal covering a broad spectrum of topics in cardiology. The journal has been published since 1994 and over the years it has become an internationally recognized journal of cardiological and medical community.
Cardiology Journal is the journal for practicing cardiologists, researchers, and young trainees benefiting from broad spectrum of useful educational content.