培训培训师:通过模拟-简报模式提高辅助医务人员的教育质量。

Pascale Avery, Charlotte Thompson, Philip Cowburn
{"title":"培训培训师:通过模拟-简报模式提高辅助医务人员的教育质量。","authors":"Pascale Avery, Charlotte Thompson, Philip Cowburn","doi":"10.29045/14784726.2023.3.7.4.51","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Education and training delivered within ambulance services is vital to clinicians maintaining competence, confidence and currency. Simulation and debrief in medical education aims to imitate clinical experience and provide real-time feedback. The South Western Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust employs senior doctors in their learning and development (L&D) team to support the development of 'train the trainer' courses for L&D officers (LDOs). This short report of a quality improvement initiative describes the implementation and evaluation of a simulation-debrief model of paramedic education.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A quality improvement design was adopted. The train the trainer scenarios for simulation-debrief were designed and written following the trust's training needs analysis by the L&D team. The course ran for two days, and each scenario was facilitated by faculty experienced in simulation (both doctors and paramedics). Low-fidelity mannequins and standard ambulance training kit was used (including response bags, training monitor and defibrillator). Participants' pre- and post-scenario self-reported confidence scores were recorded, and qualitative feedback requested. Numerical data were analysed, and collated into graphs using Excel. Thematic analysis of comments was used to present qualitative themes. The SQUIRE 2.0 checklist for reporting quality improvement initiatives was used to frame this short report.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-eight LDOs attended across three courses. All participants reported improved confidence scores in the clinical topic covered after each simulation-debrief scenario, with a minority reporting equivocal scores. Formal qualitative feedback from participants indicated an overwhelmingly positive response to the introduction of simulation-debrief as an education method, and a move away from summative, assessment-based training. The positive value of a multidisciplinary faculty was also reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The simulation-debrief model of paramedic education represents a move away from the use of didactic teaching and 'tick box'-style assessments in previous train the trainer courses. The introduction of simulation-debrief teaching methodology has had a positive impact on paramedics' confidence in the selected clinical topics, and is seen by LDOs as an effective and valuable education method.</p>","PeriodicalId":72470,"journal":{"name":"British paramedic journal","volume":"7 4","pages":"51-56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9983060/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Training the trainers: improving the quality of education delivered to paramedics through a simulation-debrief model.\",\"authors\":\"Pascale Avery, Charlotte Thompson, Philip Cowburn\",\"doi\":\"10.29045/14784726.2023.3.7.4.51\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Education and training delivered within ambulance services is vital to clinicians maintaining competence, confidence and currency. Simulation and debrief in medical education aims to imitate clinical experience and provide real-time feedback. The South Western Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust employs senior doctors in their learning and development (L&D) team to support the development of 'train the trainer' courses for L&D officers (LDOs). This short report of a quality improvement initiative describes the implementation and evaluation of a simulation-debrief model of paramedic education.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A quality improvement design was adopted. The train the trainer scenarios for simulation-debrief were designed and written following the trust's training needs analysis by the L&D team. The course ran for two days, and each scenario was facilitated by faculty experienced in simulation (both doctors and paramedics). Low-fidelity mannequins and standard ambulance training kit was used (including response bags, training monitor and defibrillator). Participants' pre- and post-scenario self-reported confidence scores were recorded, and qualitative feedback requested. Numerical data were analysed, and collated into graphs using Excel. Thematic analysis of comments was used to present qualitative themes. The SQUIRE 2.0 checklist for reporting quality improvement initiatives was used to frame this short report.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-eight LDOs attended across three courses. All participants reported improved confidence scores in the clinical topic covered after each simulation-debrief scenario, with a minority reporting equivocal scores. Formal qualitative feedback from participants indicated an overwhelmingly positive response to the introduction of simulation-debrief as an education method, and a move away from summative, assessment-based training. The positive value of a multidisciplinary faculty was also reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The simulation-debrief model of paramedic education represents a move away from the use of didactic teaching and 'tick box'-style assessments in previous train the trainer courses. The introduction of simulation-debrief teaching methodology has had a positive impact on paramedics' confidence in the selected clinical topics, and is seen by LDOs as an effective and valuable education method.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72470,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British paramedic journal\",\"volume\":\"7 4\",\"pages\":\"51-56\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9983060/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British paramedic journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29045/14784726.2023.3.7.4.51\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British paramedic journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29045/14784726.2023.3.7.4.51","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:在救护服务中开展的教育和培训对于临床医生保持能力、信心和经验至关重要。医学教育中的模拟和汇报旨在模仿临床经验并提供实时反馈。西南救护服务 NHS 基金会信托基金会在其学习与发展(L&D)团队中聘用了资深医生,以支持为 L&D 官员(LDOs)开发 "培训培训师 "课程。这篇关于质量改进措施的简短报告介绍了辅助医务人员教育模拟-简报模式的实施和评估情况:方法:采用质量改进设计。方法: 采用了质量改进设计,由 L&D 团队根据信托基金的培训需求分析,设计并编写了模拟汇报的培训师培训情景。课程为期两天,每个场景都由模拟经验丰富的教师(包括医生和护理人员)主持。课程使用了低保真人体模型和标准救护车培训套件(包括反应袋、培训监视器和除颤器)。记录参与者在情景模拟前后自我报告的信心分数,并要求提供定性反馈。对数字数据进行分析,并使用 Excel 整理成图表。对评论意见进行专题分析,以呈现定性主题。本简短报告采用 SQUIRE 2.0 质量改进计划报告核对表:48 名 LDO 参加了三个课程。所有学员都表示,在每次模拟-简报情景模拟后,他们对所涉及临床课题的信心指数都有所提高,但也有少数学员表示信心指数不稳定。来自学员的正式定性反馈表明,绝大多数学员对引入模拟汇报作为一种教育方法持积极态度,并摒弃了以总结和评估为基础的培训方式。此外,还报告了多学科师资队伍的积极价值:结论:模拟汇报教学模式代表着辅助医务人员教育摒弃了以往培训员培训课程中的说教式教学和 "打勾 "式评估。模拟汇报教学法的引入对辅助医务人员对选定临床课题的信心产生了积极影响,并被医务主任视为一种有效且有价值的教育方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Training the trainers: improving the quality of education delivered to paramedics through a simulation-debrief model.

Introduction: Education and training delivered within ambulance services is vital to clinicians maintaining competence, confidence and currency. Simulation and debrief in medical education aims to imitate clinical experience and provide real-time feedback. The South Western Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust employs senior doctors in their learning and development (L&D) team to support the development of 'train the trainer' courses for L&D officers (LDOs). This short report of a quality improvement initiative describes the implementation and evaluation of a simulation-debrief model of paramedic education.

Methods: A quality improvement design was adopted. The train the trainer scenarios for simulation-debrief were designed and written following the trust's training needs analysis by the L&D team. The course ran for two days, and each scenario was facilitated by faculty experienced in simulation (both doctors and paramedics). Low-fidelity mannequins and standard ambulance training kit was used (including response bags, training monitor and defibrillator). Participants' pre- and post-scenario self-reported confidence scores were recorded, and qualitative feedback requested. Numerical data were analysed, and collated into graphs using Excel. Thematic analysis of comments was used to present qualitative themes. The SQUIRE 2.0 checklist for reporting quality improvement initiatives was used to frame this short report.

Results: Forty-eight LDOs attended across three courses. All participants reported improved confidence scores in the clinical topic covered after each simulation-debrief scenario, with a minority reporting equivocal scores. Formal qualitative feedback from participants indicated an overwhelmingly positive response to the introduction of simulation-debrief as an education method, and a move away from summative, assessment-based training. The positive value of a multidisciplinary faculty was also reported.

Conclusion: The simulation-debrief model of paramedic education represents a move away from the use of didactic teaching and 'tick box'-style assessments in previous train the trainer courses. The introduction of simulation-debrief teaching methodology has had a positive impact on paramedics' confidence in the selected clinical topics, and is seen by LDOs as an effective and valuable education method.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信