临床医生采用亲子互动疗法:实施干预措施的系统回顾。

Implementation research and practice Pub Date : 2022-03-07 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1177/26334895221082330
Melanie J Woodfield, Sally Merry, Sarah E Hetrick
{"title":"临床医生采用亲子互动疗法:实施干预措施的系统回顾。","authors":"Melanie J Woodfield, Sally Merry, Sarah E Hetrick","doi":"10.1177/26334895221082330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Parent-Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT) is a parent training intervention for childhood conduct problems, distinctive in its use of live clinician coaching of the parent-child dyad via a one-way mirror and discrete earpiece. However, despite a compelling evidence base, uptake of evidence-based parent training programmes such as PCIT by clinicians in routine care settings remains poor. This systematic review aimed to identify and synthesise implementation interventions that have sought to increase clinician adoption of PCIT in usual care settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), PsycInfo (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCO), Science Citation Index and Social Sciences Citation Index, and Web of Science Core Collection from inception to October 2020. Articles were included if they tested (by way of randomised controlled trials, controlled clinical trials, interrupted time series and controlled before and after trials) implementation interventions across any and all of the patient, clinician, clinic, system or policy domains. Two independent reviewers screened and selected studies, assessed risk of bias and extracted data - summarising implementation intervention components according to items from the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist ( Hoffmann et al., 2014).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 769 articles identified once duplicates were removed, 13 papers relating to three studies met the inclusion criteria - all were quantitative or mixed-methods examinations of the effectiveness of different PCIT clinician training or training-related consultation methods. A narrative description of interventions was provided, as quantitative synthesis was not possible.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Research attention has to date been focussed on the establishment of an evidence-base for PCIT's effectiveness, with relatively little attention to the dissemination, implementation and sustainment of this treatment. Those studies that do exist have focused on training methods and training-related expert consultation. Research attention could usefully turn to both adoption and sustainment of this effective treatment in usual care settings.</p><p><strong>Plain language summary: </strong>In this review, we aimed to summarise what is already known about how to implement PCIT in community settings after clinicians have received training in the approach. While research relating to the implementation of other parent training programmes is interesting and informative, implementation efforts are most effective when tailored to a specific programme in a specific context. As such, it was important to review published studies relating to PCIT specifically. We identified three relevant studies, one of which is yet to publish its main implementation findings. The three studies have focused on how best to train clinicians in PCIT, including how best to provide post-training support from expert trainers. We concluded that a fruitful line for future research would be to focus on the post-training period, particularly how best to support clinicians to adopt and sustain PCIT in their practice.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>The study was prospectively registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) on 01/10/2020 (CRD42020207118).</p>","PeriodicalId":73354,"journal":{"name":"Implementation research and practice","volume":"3 ","pages":"26334895221082330"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/67/c8/10.1177_26334895221082330.PMC9924277.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinician adoption of Parent-Child Interaction Therapy: A systematic review of implementation interventions.\",\"authors\":\"Melanie J Woodfield, Sally Merry, Sarah E Hetrick\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/26334895221082330\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Parent-Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT) is a parent training intervention for childhood conduct problems, distinctive in its use of live clinician coaching of the parent-child dyad via a one-way mirror and discrete earpiece. However, despite a compelling evidence base, uptake of evidence-based parent training programmes such as PCIT by clinicians in routine care settings remains poor. This systematic review aimed to identify and synthesise implementation interventions that have sought to increase clinician adoption of PCIT in usual care settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), PsycInfo (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCO), Science Citation Index and Social Sciences Citation Index, and Web of Science Core Collection from inception to October 2020. Articles were included if they tested (by way of randomised controlled trials, controlled clinical trials, interrupted time series and controlled before and after trials) implementation interventions across any and all of the patient, clinician, clinic, system or policy domains. Two independent reviewers screened and selected studies, assessed risk of bias and extracted data - summarising implementation intervention components according to items from the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist ( Hoffmann et al., 2014).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 769 articles identified once duplicates were removed, 13 papers relating to three studies met the inclusion criteria - all were quantitative or mixed-methods examinations of the effectiveness of different PCIT clinician training or training-related consultation methods. A narrative description of interventions was provided, as quantitative synthesis was not possible.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Research attention has to date been focussed on the establishment of an evidence-base for PCIT's effectiveness, with relatively little attention to the dissemination, implementation and sustainment of this treatment. Those studies that do exist have focused on training methods and training-related expert consultation. Research attention could usefully turn to both adoption and sustainment of this effective treatment in usual care settings.</p><p><strong>Plain language summary: </strong>In this review, we aimed to summarise what is already known about how to implement PCIT in community settings after clinicians have received training in the approach. While research relating to the implementation of other parent training programmes is interesting and informative, implementation efforts are most effective when tailored to a specific programme in a specific context. As such, it was important to review published studies relating to PCIT specifically. We identified three relevant studies, one of which is yet to publish its main implementation findings. The three studies have focused on how best to train clinicians in PCIT, including how best to provide post-training support from expert trainers. We concluded that a fruitful line for future research would be to focus on the post-training period, particularly how best to support clinicians to adopt and sustain PCIT in their practice.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>The study was prospectively registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) on 01/10/2020 (CRD42020207118).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73354,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Implementation research and practice\",\"volume\":\"3 \",\"pages\":\"26334895221082330\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/67/c8/10.1177_26334895221082330.PMC9924277.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Implementation research and practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/26334895221082330\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Implementation research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26334895221082330","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:亲子互动疗法(PCIT)是一种针对儿童行为问题的家长培训干预措施,其独特之处在于临床医生通过单向镜和独立耳机对亲子关系进行现场指导。然而,尽管有令人信服的证据基础,临床医生在日常护理环境中对 PCIT 等循证家长培训计划的采用率仍然很低。本系统性综述旨在确定并综合那些旨在提高临床医生在常规护理环境中采用 PCIT 的实施干预措施:我们检索了 MEDLINE (Ovid)、Embase (Ovid)、PsycInfo (Ovid)、CINAHL (EBSCO)、《科学引文索引》和《社会科学引文索引》,以及从开始到 2020 年 10 月的 Web of Science Core Collection。如果文章(通过随机对照试验、对照临床试验、间断时间序列和对照前后试验)对患者、临床医生、诊所、系统或政策领域的任何或所有实施干预措施进行了测试,则被纳入其中。两位独立审稿人对研究进行了筛选,评估了偏倚风险并提取了数据--根据干预措施描述和复制模板(TIDieR)清单(霍夫曼等人,2014 年)中的项目对实施干预措施的组成部分进行了总结:在剔除重复文章后确定的 769 篇文章中,与三项研究相关的 13 篇论文符合纳入标准--所有这些论文都是对不同 PCIT 临床医师培训或培训相关咨询方法的有效性进行的定量或混合方法研究。由于无法进行定量综合,因此对干预措施进行了叙述性描述:迄今为止,研究关注的重点是建立 PCIT 有效性的证据基础,而对这种治疗方法的传播、实施和持续性关注相对较少。现有的研究主要集中在培训方法和与培训相关的专家咨询方面。本综述旨在总结临床医生接受 PCIT 培训后,如何在社区环境中实施 PCIT 的相关知识。虽然与其他家长培训计划的实施相关的研究很有趣,也很有参考价值,但只有在特定环境下针对特定计划开展的实施工作才是最有效的。因此,有必要对已发表的与 PCIT 相关的研究进行专门审查。我们确定了三项相关研究,其中一项尚未公布其主要实施结果。这三项研究的重点是如何以最佳方式对临床医生进行 PCIT 培训,包括如何以最佳方式由专家培训师提供培训后支持。我们的结论是,未来研究的一个重点是培训后的阶段,尤其是如何最好地支持临床医生在实践中采用并维持 PCIT:本研究已于2020年10月1日在国际系统综述前瞻性注册中心(PROSPERO)进行了前瞻性注册(CRD42020207118)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Clinician adoption of Parent-Child Interaction Therapy: A systematic review of implementation interventions.

Clinician adoption of Parent-Child Interaction Therapy: A systematic review of implementation interventions.

Clinician adoption of Parent-Child Interaction Therapy: A systematic review of implementation interventions.

Clinician adoption of Parent-Child Interaction Therapy: A systematic review of implementation interventions.

Background: Parent-Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT) is a parent training intervention for childhood conduct problems, distinctive in its use of live clinician coaching of the parent-child dyad via a one-way mirror and discrete earpiece. However, despite a compelling evidence base, uptake of evidence-based parent training programmes such as PCIT by clinicians in routine care settings remains poor. This systematic review aimed to identify and synthesise implementation interventions that have sought to increase clinician adoption of PCIT in usual care settings.

Methods: We searched MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), PsycInfo (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCO), Science Citation Index and Social Sciences Citation Index, and Web of Science Core Collection from inception to October 2020. Articles were included if they tested (by way of randomised controlled trials, controlled clinical trials, interrupted time series and controlled before and after trials) implementation interventions across any and all of the patient, clinician, clinic, system or policy domains. Two independent reviewers screened and selected studies, assessed risk of bias and extracted data - summarising implementation intervention components according to items from the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist ( Hoffmann et al., 2014).

Results: Of the 769 articles identified once duplicates were removed, 13 papers relating to three studies met the inclusion criteria - all were quantitative or mixed-methods examinations of the effectiveness of different PCIT clinician training or training-related consultation methods. A narrative description of interventions was provided, as quantitative synthesis was not possible.

Conclusions: Research attention has to date been focussed on the establishment of an evidence-base for PCIT's effectiveness, with relatively little attention to the dissemination, implementation and sustainment of this treatment. Those studies that do exist have focused on training methods and training-related expert consultation. Research attention could usefully turn to both adoption and sustainment of this effective treatment in usual care settings.

Plain language summary: In this review, we aimed to summarise what is already known about how to implement PCIT in community settings after clinicians have received training in the approach. While research relating to the implementation of other parent training programmes is interesting and informative, implementation efforts are most effective when tailored to a specific programme in a specific context. As such, it was important to review published studies relating to PCIT specifically. We identified three relevant studies, one of which is yet to publish its main implementation findings. The three studies have focused on how best to train clinicians in PCIT, including how best to provide post-training support from expert trainers. We concluded that a fruitful line for future research would be to focus on the post-training period, particularly how best to support clinicians to adopt and sustain PCIT in their practice.

Systematic review registration: The study was prospectively registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) on 01/10/2020 (CRD42020207118).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信