Joan Inglés Torruella, Rosa Maria Gil Soto, Esther Sabaté Aguila, Mercé García Grau, Nina Pons Boronat, Adelaida Rubio Civit, Miriam Bandera Baez, Gustavo Moreno Martin
{"title":"[新冠肺炎mRNA疫苗的反应原性研究]。","authors":"Joan Inglés Torruella, Rosa Maria Gil Soto, Esther Sabaté Aguila, Mercé García Grau, Nina Pons Boronat, Adelaida Rubio Civit, Miriam Bandera Baez, Gustavo Moreno Martin","doi":"10.12961/aprl.2022.26.02.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the reactogenicity between the types of mRNA Commirnaty® (Pfizer) and Spikevax® (Moderna) vaccines against COVID-19 in a healthcare population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross sectional study of short-term adverse effects and their consequences (sick leave, limitations of daily life, etc.) after the administration of the first and second doses of both vaccines in professionals and students of a health institution. A questionnaire on symptoms and their consequences was administered seven days after each vaccination dose. The prevalence and 95% confidence interval (95%CI) were calculated. Differences between vaccines were quantified using the odds ratio (OR) and its 95%CI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The questionnaire was completed by 1924 and 1170 healthcare providers (response rates 62.2% and 39.1%) after the first and second doses, respectively, of the Commirnaty® vaccine, and 410 (56.0%) and 107 (15.0%) of Spikevax®. After the first dose of Comirnaty®, 67.4% presented some adverse effect, and 76.1% for Spikevax® (OR 1.5 95%CI 1.2-1.9). In general, women and young people showed greater reactogenicity and differences between vaccinSpain. Consequences of adverse effects were more frequent for Spikevax®. The reactogenicity was higher after the second than the first dose, for both vaccines (Comirnaty®: 67.4% vs. 75.6%; Spikevax®: 76.1% vs. 87.9%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The greater reactogenicity and its consequences, for the first and second dose of the Spikevax® vaccine compared to Comirnaty®, and of the second dose compared to the first dose of both vaccines, provides useful knowledge for planning vaccination against COVID-19 campaigns in healthcare settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":38326,"journal":{"name":"Archivos de prevención de riesgos laborales","volume":"26 2","pages":"106-126"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Reactogenicity Study of mRNA Vaccines Against COVID-19].\",\"authors\":\"Joan Inglés Torruella, Rosa Maria Gil Soto, Esther Sabaté Aguila, Mercé García Grau, Nina Pons Boronat, Adelaida Rubio Civit, Miriam Bandera Baez, Gustavo Moreno Martin\",\"doi\":\"10.12961/aprl.2022.26.02.02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the reactogenicity between the types of mRNA Commirnaty® (Pfizer) and Spikevax® (Moderna) vaccines against COVID-19 in a healthcare population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross sectional study of short-term adverse effects and their consequences (sick leave, limitations of daily life, etc.) after the administration of the first and second doses of both vaccines in professionals and students of a health institution. A questionnaire on symptoms and their consequences was administered seven days after each vaccination dose. The prevalence and 95% confidence interval (95%CI) were calculated. Differences between vaccines were quantified using the odds ratio (OR) and its 95%CI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The questionnaire was completed by 1924 and 1170 healthcare providers (response rates 62.2% and 39.1%) after the first and second doses, respectively, of the Commirnaty® vaccine, and 410 (56.0%) and 107 (15.0%) of Spikevax®. After the first dose of Comirnaty®, 67.4% presented some adverse effect, and 76.1% for Spikevax® (OR 1.5 95%CI 1.2-1.9). In general, women and young people showed greater reactogenicity and differences between vaccinSpain. Consequences of adverse effects were more frequent for Spikevax®. The reactogenicity was higher after the second than the first dose, for both vaccines (Comirnaty®: 67.4% vs. 75.6%; Spikevax®: 76.1% vs. 87.9%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The greater reactogenicity and its consequences, for the first and second dose of the Spikevax® vaccine compared to Comirnaty®, and of the second dose compared to the first dose of both vaccines, provides useful knowledge for planning vaccination against COVID-19 campaigns in healthcare settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archivos de prevención de riesgos laborales\",\"volume\":\"26 2\",\"pages\":\"106-126\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archivos de prevención de riesgos laborales\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12961/aprl.2022.26.02.02\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivos de prevención de riesgos laborales","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12961/aprl.2022.26.02.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
[Reactogenicity Study of mRNA Vaccines Against COVID-19].
Objective: To compare the reactogenicity between the types of mRNA Commirnaty® (Pfizer) and Spikevax® (Moderna) vaccines against COVID-19 in a healthcare population.
Methods: Cross sectional study of short-term adverse effects and their consequences (sick leave, limitations of daily life, etc.) after the administration of the first and second doses of both vaccines in professionals and students of a health institution. A questionnaire on symptoms and their consequences was administered seven days after each vaccination dose. The prevalence and 95% confidence interval (95%CI) were calculated. Differences between vaccines were quantified using the odds ratio (OR) and its 95%CI.
Results: The questionnaire was completed by 1924 and 1170 healthcare providers (response rates 62.2% and 39.1%) after the first and second doses, respectively, of the Commirnaty® vaccine, and 410 (56.0%) and 107 (15.0%) of Spikevax®. After the first dose of Comirnaty®, 67.4% presented some adverse effect, and 76.1% for Spikevax® (OR 1.5 95%CI 1.2-1.9). In general, women and young people showed greater reactogenicity and differences between vaccinSpain. Consequences of adverse effects were more frequent for Spikevax®. The reactogenicity was higher after the second than the first dose, for both vaccines (Comirnaty®: 67.4% vs. 75.6%; Spikevax®: 76.1% vs. 87.9%.
Conclusions: The greater reactogenicity and its consequences, for the first and second dose of the Spikevax® vaccine compared to Comirnaty®, and of the second dose compared to the first dose of both vaccines, provides useful knowledge for planning vaccination against COVID-19 campaigns in healthcare settings.