Lilia Albores-Gallo, Ofelia Roldán-Ceballos, Gabriela Villarreal-Valdes, Blanca Xochitl Betanzos-Cruz, Claudia Santos-Sánchez, Maria Magdalena Martínez-Jaime, Isaac Lemus-Espinosa, Claudia List Hilton
{"title":"M-CHAT墨西哥版本的有效性和可靠性以及一些文化考虑。","authors":"Lilia Albores-Gallo, Ofelia Roldán-Ceballos, Gabriela Villarreal-Valdes, Blanca Xochitl Betanzos-Cruz, Claudia Santos-Sánchez, Maria Magdalena Martínez-Jaime, Isaac Lemus-Espinosa, Claudia List Hilton","doi":"10.5402/2012/408694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers (M-CHAT) questionnaire is a brief measure available in Spanish which needs to be validated for the Mexican population. Parents of children from (1) community with typical development (TD) and (2) psychiatric outpatient unit completed the CBCL/1.5-5 and the Mexican/MM-CHAT-version. The study sample consisted of 456 children (age M = 4.46, SD = 1.12), 74.34% TD children and 26.65% with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD). The MM-CHAT mean score for failed key items was higher for the ASD group compared with the TD group. Internal consistency for the Mexican/M-CHAT version was .76 for total score and .70 for the 6 critical items. Correlations between the MM-CHAT and the CBCL/1.5: PDD and Withdrawn subscales and with ADI-R dimensions: B non verbal) and A were high, and were moderate with ADI-R dimensions B1 (verbal) and C The failure rate of the MM-CHAT between the groups did not reproduce all the critical items found in other studies. Although the instrument has good psychometric properties and can be used for screening purposes in primary settings or busy specialized psychiatric clinics, these results support evidence for cultural differences in item responses, making it difficult to compare M-CHAT results internationally.</p>","PeriodicalId":14626,"journal":{"name":"ISRN Neurology","volume":"2012 ","pages":"408694"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5402/2012/408694","citationCount":"62","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"M-CHAT Mexican Version Validity and Reliability and Some Cultural Considerations.\",\"authors\":\"Lilia Albores-Gallo, Ofelia Roldán-Ceballos, Gabriela Villarreal-Valdes, Blanca Xochitl Betanzos-Cruz, Claudia Santos-Sánchez, Maria Magdalena Martínez-Jaime, Isaac Lemus-Espinosa, Claudia List Hilton\",\"doi\":\"10.5402/2012/408694\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers (M-CHAT) questionnaire is a brief measure available in Spanish which needs to be validated for the Mexican population. Parents of children from (1) community with typical development (TD) and (2) psychiatric outpatient unit completed the CBCL/1.5-5 and the Mexican/MM-CHAT-version. The study sample consisted of 456 children (age M = 4.46, SD = 1.12), 74.34% TD children and 26.65% with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD). The MM-CHAT mean score for failed key items was higher for the ASD group compared with the TD group. Internal consistency for the Mexican/M-CHAT version was .76 for total score and .70 for the 6 critical items. Correlations between the MM-CHAT and the CBCL/1.5: PDD and Withdrawn subscales and with ADI-R dimensions: B non verbal) and A were high, and were moderate with ADI-R dimensions B1 (verbal) and C The failure rate of the MM-CHAT between the groups did not reproduce all the critical items found in other studies. Although the instrument has good psychometric properties and can be used for screening purposes in primary settings or busy specialized psychiatric clinics, these results support evidence for cultural differences in item responses, making it difficult to compare M-CHAT results internationally.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14626,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ISRN Neurology\",\"volume\":\"2012 \",\"pages\":\"408694\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5402/2012/408694\",\"citationCount\":\"62\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ISRN Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/408694\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISRN Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/408694","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 62
摘要
修改后的幼儿自闭症检查表(M-CHAT)问卷是一种西班牙语的简短测量方法,需要对墨西哥人口进行验证。来自(1)典型发展社区(TD)和(2)精神科门诊的儿童家长完成了CBCL/1.5-5和墨西哥/ mm - chat版本。研究样本包括456名儿童(年龄M = 4.46, SD = 1.12),其中TD儿童占74.34%,自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)患儿占26.65%。与TD组相比,ASD组的MM-CHAT失败关键项目平均得分更高。墨西哥/M-CHAT版本总分的内部一致性为0.76,6个关键项目的内部一致性为0.70。MM-CHAT与CBCL/1.5: PDD和退缩分量表以及ADI-R维度:B(非言语)和A之间的相关性较高,与ADI-R维度B1(言语)和C之间的相关性中等。组间MM-CHAT的失败率没有重现其他研究中发现的所有关键项目。虽然该仪器具有良好的心理测量特性,可用于初级环境或繁忙的专业精神病学诊所的筛查目的,但这些结果支持项目反应中文化差异的证据,使得比较M-CHAT结果在国际上变得困难。
M-CHAT Mexican Version Validity and Reliability and Some Cultural Considerations.
The Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers (M-CHAT) questionnaire is a brief measure available in Spanish which needs to be validated for the Mexican population. Parents of children from (1) community with typical development (TD) and (2) psychiatric outpatient unit completed the CBCL/1.5-5 and the Mexican/MM-CHAT-version. The study sample consisted of 456 children (age M = 4.46, SD = 1.12), 74.34% TD children and 26.65% with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD). The MM-CHAT mean score for failed key items was higher for the ASD group compared with the TD group. Internal consistency for the Mexican/M-CHAT version was .76 for total score and .70 for the 6 critical items. Correlations between the MM-CHAT and the CBCL/1.5: PDD and Withdrawn subscales and with ADI-R dimensions: B non verbal) and A were high, and were moderate with ADI-R dimensions B1 (verbal) and C The failure rate of the MM-CHAT between the groups did not reproduce all the critical items found in other studies. Although the instrument has good psychometric properties and can be used for screening purposes in primary settings or busy specialized psychiatric clinics, these results support evidence for cultural differences in item responses, making it difficult to compare M-CHAT results internationally.