一个创新的低血糖途径的随机对照试验自我护理在家里和入院避免:伙伴关系的方法与区域救护车信托。

Andrew Willis, Helen Dallosso, Laura Gray, June James, Cat Taylor, Melanie Davies, Debbie Shaw, Niroshan Siriwardena, Kamlesh Khunti
{"title":"一个创新的低血糖途径的随机对照试验自我护理在家里和入院避免:伙伴关系的方法与区域救护车信托。","authors":"Andrew Willis,&nbsp;Helen Dallosso,&nbsp;Laura Gray,&nbsp;June James,&nbsp;Cat Taylor,&nbsp;Melanie Davies,&nbsp;Debbie Shaw,&nbsp;Niroshan Siriwardena,&nbsp;Kamlesh Khunti","doi":"10.29045/14784726.2022.03.6.4.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hypoglycaemia is a common and potentially life-threatening condition in people with diabetes, commonly caused by medications such as insulin. Hypoglycaemic events often require in-patient treatment and/or follow-up with a diabetes specialist nurse (DSN) or GP to make adjustments to medication. This referral pathway commonly relies on patient self-referral to primary care, and as a result many patients are not actively followed up and go on to experience repeat hypoglycaemic events.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Randomised controlled trial in partnership with East Midlands Ambulance Service NHS Trust. People with diabetes calling out an ambulance for a severe hypoglycaemic episode and meeting the eligibility criteria were randomised to either a novel DSN-led pathway or to their general practice for routine follow-up. Primary outcome was proportion of participants with a documented consultation with a healthcare professional to discuss the management of their diabetes within 28 days of call-out.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>162 people were randomised to one of the pathways (73 DSN arm, 89 GP arm) with 81 (50%, 35 DSN, 46 GP) providing full consent to be followed up. Due to lower than anticipated randomisation and consent rates, the recruitment target was not met. In the 81 participants who provided full consent, there were higher rates of consultation following the call-out when referred to a DSN compared to primary care (90% vs. 65%). Of the 81 participants, 26 (32%) had a second call-out within 12 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Consultation rates following the call-out were high in the DSN-led arm, but there was insufficient power to complete the planned comparative analysis. The study highlighted the difficulty in recruitment and delivery of research in pre-hospital emergency care. Further work is needed to provide more feasible study designs and consent procedures balancing demands on ambulance staff time with the need for robust well-designed evaluation of referral pathways.</p>","PeriodicalId":72470,"journal":{"name":"British paramedic journal","volume":"6 4","pages":"3-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8892445/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Randomised controlled trial of an innovative hypoglycaemia pathway for self-care at home and admission avoidance: a partnership approach with a regional ambulance trust.\",\"authors\":\"Andrew Willis,&nbsp;Helen Dallosso,&nbsp;Laura Gray,&nbsp;June James,&nbsp;Cat Taylor,&nbsp;Melanie Davies,&nbsp;Debbie Shaw,&nbsp;Niroshan Siriwardena,&nbsp;Kamlesh Khunti\",\"doi\":\"10.29045/14784726.2022.03.6.4.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hypoglycaemia is a common and potentially life-threatening condition in people with diabetes, commonly caused by medications such as insulin. Hypoglycaemic events often require in-patient treatment and/or follow-up with a diabetes specialist nurse (DSN) or GP to make adjustments to medication. This referral pathway commonly relies on patient self-referral to primary care, and as a result many patients are not actively followed up and go on to experience repeat hypoglycaemic events.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Randomised controlled trial in partnership with East Midlands Ambulance Service NHS Trust. People with diabetes calling out an ambulance for a severe hypoglycaemic episode and meeting the eligibility criteria were randomised to either a novel DSN-led pathway or to their general practice for routine follow-up. Primary outcome was proportion of participants with a documented consultation with a healthcare professional to discuss the management of their diabetes within 28 days of call-out.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>162 people were randomised to one of the pathways (73 DSN arm, 89 GP arm) with 81 (50%, 35 DSN, 46 GP) providing full consent to be followed up. Due to lower than anticipated randomisation and consent rates, the recruitment target was not met. In the 81 participants who provided full consent, there were higher rates of consultation following the call-out when referred to a DSN compared to primary care (90% vs. 65%). Of the 81 participants, 26 (32%) had a second call-out within 12 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Consultation rates following the call-out were high in the DSN-led arm, but there was insufficient power to complete the planned comparative analysis. The study highlighted the difficulty in recruitment and delivery of research in pre-hospital emergency care. Further work is needed to provide more feasible study designs and consent procedures balancing demands on ambulance staff time with the need for robust well-designed evaluation of referral pathways.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72470,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British paramedic journal\",\"volume\":\"6 4\",\"pages\":\"3-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8892445/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British paramedic journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29045/14784726.2022.03.6.4.3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British paramedic journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29045/14784726.2022.03.6.4.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:低血糖是糖尿病患者常见且可能危及生命的疾病,通常由胰岛素等药物引起。低血糖事件通常需要住院治疗和/或糖尿病专科护士(DSN)或全科医生的随访,以调整药物。这种转诊途径通常依赖于患者自我转诊到初级保健,因此许多患者没有积极随访,继续经历反复的低血糖事件。方法:与东米德兰兹救护车服务NHS信托合作进行随机对照试验。符合资格标准的因严重低血糖发作而呼叫救护车的糖尿病患者被随机分配到一个新的dsn引导的途径或他们的常规随访。主要结果是参与者在28天内与医疗保健专业人员进行书面咨询,讨论糖尿病管理的比例。结果:162人被随机分配到其中一种途径(73人DSN组,89人GP组),81人(50%,35人DSN组,46人GP组)完全同意随访。由于低于预期的随机化和同意率,没有达到招募目标。在81名提供完全同意的参与者中,与初级保健相比,在提到DSN时,呼叫后的咨询率更高(90%对65%)。在81名参与者中,26名(32%)在12个月内进行了第二次呼叫。结论:dsn引导臂呼出后的会诊率较高,但不足以完成计划的比较分析。该研究强调了院前急救研究的招募和交付的困难。需要进一步的工作来提供更可行的研究设计和同意程序,以平衡对救护车工作人员时间的需求和对转诊途径进行稳健、精心设计的评估的需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Randomised controlled trial of an innovative hypoglycaemia pathway for self-care at home and admission avoidance: a partnership approach with a regional ambulance trust.

Randomised controlled trial of an innovative hypoglycaemia pathway for self-care at home and admission avoidance: a partnership approach with a regional ambulance trust.

Background: Hypoglycaemia is a common and potentially life-threatening condition in people with diabetes, commonly caused by medications such as insulin. Hypoglycaemic events often require in-patient treatment and/or follow-up with a diabetes specialist nurse (DSN) or GP to make adjustments to medication. This referral pathway commonly relies on patient self-referral to primary care, and as a result many patients are not actively followed up and go on to experience repeat hypoglycaemic events.

Methods: Randomised controlled trial in partnership with East Midlands Ambulance Service NHS Trust. People with diabetes calling out an ambulance for a severe hypoglycaemic episode and meeting the eligibility criteria were randomised to either a novel DSN-led pathway or to their general practice for routine follow-up. Primary outcome was proportion of participants with a documented consultation with a healthcare professional to discuss the management of their diabetes within 28 days of call-out.

Results: 162 people were randomised to one of the pathways (73 DSN arm, 89 GP arm) with 81 (50%, 35 DSN, 46 GP) providing full consent to be followed up. Due to lower than anticipated randomisation and consent rates, the recruitment target was not met. In the 81 participants who provided full consent, there were higher rates of consultation following the call-out when referred to a DSN compared to primary care (90% vs. 65%). Of the 81 participants, 26 (32%) had a second call-out within 12 months.

Conclusions: Consultation rates following the call-out were high in the DSN-led arm, but there was insufficient power to complete the planned comparative analysis. The study highlighted the difficulty in recruitment and delivery of research in pre-hospital emergency care. Further work is needed to provide more feasible study designs and consent procedures balancing demands on ambulance staff time with the need for robust well-designed evaluation of referral pathways.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信