对使用远程医疗提供心理健康服务时的风险、不利影响和缓解策略的审查。

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Journal of Mental Health Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-03-03 DOI:10.1080/09638237.2023.2182422
Alexandra Martiniuk, Amy Toepfer, Amanda Lane-Brown
{"title":"对使用远程医疗提供心理健康服务时的风险、不利影响和缓解策略的审查。","authors":"Alexandra Martiniuk, Amy Toepfer, Amanda Lane-Brown","doi":"10.1080/09638237.2023.2182422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This paper presents a scoping review of the peer-reviewed literature regarding reported risks, adverse effects and mitigation factors related to providing mental health services using telehealth.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The paper aims to describe risks and risk management strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Publications were included if they reported upon risks, adverse events or mitigation factors experienced, hypothesised or discussed for: any population (any country, any age), service (any mental health services), intervention (telehealth), English language, 2010 to 10 July 2021, any publication type (commentary, research, policy), excluding protocol papers, and self-help tools. The following databases were searched: PsycINFO (from 2010 to 10 July 2021), MEDLINE (2010 to 10 July 2021) and the Cochrane Database from 2010 to 10 July 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search strategy resulted in 1,497 papers and after exclusions a final 55 articles were selected. Results of this scoping review are presented in terms of types of risk, risk by client population, risk by modality (eg group therapy using telehealth) and risk management.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Recommendations for future research include gathering and publishing more detailed information regarding near-miss and actual adverse events when delivering mental health assessment and care using telehealth. In clinical practice, training is required for potential adverse events, and to prevent them and reporting mechanisms in place to collate and learn from these.</p>","PeriodicalId":48135,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mental Health","volume":" ","pages":"415-438"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A review of risks, adverse effects and mitigation strategies when delivering mental health services using telehealth.\",\"authors\":\"Alexandra Martiniuk, Amy Toepfer, Amanda Lane-Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09638237.2023.2182422\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This paper presents a scoping review of the peer-reviewed literature regarding reported risks, adverse effects and mitigation factors related to providing mental health services using telehealth.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The paper aims to describe risks and risk management strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Publications were included if they reported upon risks, adverse events or mitigation factors experienced, hypothesised or discussed for: any population (any country, any age), service (any mental health services), intervention (telehealth), English language, 2010 to 10 July 2021, any publication type (commentary, research, policy), excluding protocol papers, and self-help tools. The following databases were searched: PsycINFO (from 2010 to 10 July 2021), MEDLINE (2010 to 10 July 2021) and the Cochrane Database from 2010 to 10 July 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search strategy resulted in 1,497 papers and after exclusions a final 55 articles were selected. Results of this scoping review are presented in terms of types of risk, risk by client population, risk by modality (eg group therapy using telehealth) and risk management.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Recommendations for future research include gathering and publishing more detailed information regarding near-miss and actual adverse events when delivering mental health assessment and care using telehealth. In clinical practice, training is required for potential adverse events, and to prevent them and reporting mechanisms in place to collate and learn from these.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48135,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Mental Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"415-438\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Mental Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2023.2182422\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/3/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2023.2182422","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本文对同行评议文献中有关使用远程医疗提供心理健康服务的风险、不良影响和缓解因素的报道进行了范围界定。目的:本文旨在描述风险和风险管理策略:方法:凡是报道、假设或讨论过以下风险、不良事件或缓解因素的文献均被收录:任何人群(任何国家、任何年龄)、服务(任何心理健康服务)、干预(远程医疗)、英语、2010 年至 2021 年 7 月 10 日、任何出版物类型(评论、研究、政策),不包括协议论文和自助工具。检索了以下数据库:PsycINFO(2010 年至 2021 年 7 月 10 日)、MEDLINE(2010 年至 2021 年 7 月 10 日)和 Cochrane 数据库(2010 年至 2021 年 7 月 10 日):根据搜索策略,共搜索到 1,497 篇论文,经过排除,最终选出 55 篇文章。本次范围界定综述的结果将从风险类型、客户群体风险、风险方式(如使用远程医疗的团体治疗)和风险管理等方面进行阐述:对未来研究的建议包括收集和发布更多有关使用远程医疗提供心理健康评估和护理时险些发生和实际发生的不良事件的详细信息。在临床实践中,需要对潜在的不良事件进行培训,预防不良事件的发生,并建立报告机制,对不良事件进行整理和总结。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A review of risks, adverse effects and mitigation strategies when delivering mental health services using telehealth.

Background: This paper presents a scoping review of the peer-reviewed literature regarding reported risks, adverse effects and mitigation factors related to providing mental health services using telehealth.

Aims: The paper aims to describe risks and risk management strategies.

Methods: Publications were included if they reported upon risks, adverse events or mitigation factors experienced, hypothesised or discussed for: any population (any country, any age), service (any mental health services), intervention (telehealth), English language, 2010 to 10 July 2021, any publication type (commentary, research, policy), excluding protocol papers, and self-help tools. The following databases were searched: PsycINFO (from 2010 to 10 July 2021), MEDLINE (2010 to 10 July 2021) and the Cochrane Database from 2010 to 10 July 2021.

Results: The search strategy resulted in 1,497 papers and after exclusions a final 55 articles were selected. Results of this scoping review are presented in terms of types of risk, risk by client population, risk by modality (eg group therapy using telehealth) and risk management.

Conclusions: Recommendations for future research include gathering and publishing more detailed information regarding near-miss and actual adverse events when delivering mental health assessment and care using telehealth. In clinical practice, training is required for potential adverse events, and to prevent them and reporting mechanisms in place to collate and learn from these.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Mental Health
Journal of Mental Health PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.00%
发文量
117
期刊介绍: The Journal of Mental Health is an international forum for the latest research in the mental health field. Reaching over 65 countries, the journal reports on the best in evidence-based practice around the world and provides a channel of communication between the many disciplines involved in mental health research and practice. The journal encourages multi-disciplinary research and welcomes contributions that have involved the users of mental health services. The international editorial team are committed to seeking out excellent work from a range of sources and theoretical perspectives. The journal not only reflects current good practice but also aims to influence policy by reporting on innovations that challenge traditional ways of working.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信