伊朗紧急情况严重程度指数分类:创伤中心年龄组之间的比较

IF 0.8 Q4 NURSING
Shima Javidi, Mitra Movahedi, Amin Honarmand, Amirhossein Mirafzal
{"title":"伊朗紧急情况严重程度指数分类:创伤中心年龄组之间的比较","authors":"Shima Javidi,&nbsp;Mitra Movahedi,&nbsp;Amin Honarmand,&nbsp;Amirhossein Mirafzal","doi":"10.1097/TME.0000000000000456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There are concerns about the accuracy of Emergency Severity Index (ESI) triage system in the geriatric population. This study was performed to compare the correlation of ESI triage with injury severity score (ISS) between adults with trauma younger than 60 years and those 60 years of age and older and to determine the ability of ESI to predict an ISS of greater than 15 in these two age groups. This was an observational study performed in an academic trauma center in Kerman, Iran. A convenience sample of trauma patients older than 16 years was included. Five-level ESI triage was performed by nurses with 2-10 years of exclusive experience in triage. The ISS scores were calculated by the researchers. Both numerical and categorical (ISS >15) forms of the score were considered as outcomes. Ultimately, a total of 556 patients were enrolled in the study. No difference in undertriage was seen between the age groups (p = 0. 51). Spearman's correlation coefficient between ESI level and ISS was -0.69 and -0.77 in patients younger than 60 years and those aged 60 years or older, respectively (z = 1.20). The areas under the curves (AUCs) for prediction of ISS of greater than 15 were also similar between the two age groups (0.89 in less than 60 and 0.85 in 60 or more). In conclusion, the performance of ESI was similar between the two age groups. Therefore, the application of the ESI triage system for initial categorization of trauma patients seems to be a reliable and easy-to-learn method for the triage of elderly as well as younger age groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":45446,"journal":{"name":"Advanced Emergency Nursing Journal","volume":"45 2","pages":"145-153"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Emergency Severity Index Triage in Iran: A Comparison Between Age Groups in a Trauma Center.\",\"authors\":\"Shima Javidi,&nbsp;Mitra Movahedi,&nbsp;Amin Honarmand,&nbsp;Amirhossein Mirafzal\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/TME.0000000000000456\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>There are concerns about the accuracy of Emergency Severity Index (ESI) triage system in the geriatric population. This study was performed to compare the correlation of ESI triage with injury severity score (ISS) between adults with trauma younger than 60 years and those 60 years of age and older and to determine the ability of ESI to predict an ISS of greater than 15 in these two age groups. This was an observational study performed in an academic trauma center in Kerman, Iran. A convenience sample of trauma patients older than 16 years was included. Five-level ESI triage was performed by nurses with 2-10 years of exclusive experience in triage. The ISS scores were calculated by the researchers. Both numerical and categorical (ISS >15) forms of the score were considered as outcomes. Ultimately, a total of 556 patients were enrolled in the study. No difference in undertriage was seen between the age groups (p = 0. 51). Spearman's correlation coefficient between ESI level and ISS was -0.69 and -0.77 in patients younger than 60 years and those aged 60 years or older, respectively (z = 1.20). The areas under the curves (AUCs) for prediction of ISS of greater than 15 were also similar between the two age groups (0.89 in less than 60 and 0.85 in 60 or more). In conclusion, the performance of ESI was similar between the two age groups. Therefore, the application of the ESI triage system for initial categorization of trauma patients seems to be a reliable and easy-to-learn method for the triage of elderly as well as younger age groups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45446,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advanced Emergency Nursing Journal\",\"volume\":\"45 2\",\"pages\":\"145-153\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advanced Emergency Nursing Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/TME.0000000000000456\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced Emergency Nursing Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TME.0000000000000456","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

急诊严重程度指数(ESI)分诊系统在老年人群中的准确性值得关注。本研究旨在比较60岁以下和60岁及以上成人创伤患者ESI分诊与损伤严重程度评分(ISS)的相关性,并确定ESI在这两个年龄组中预测大于15的ISS的能力。这是一项在伊朗克尔曼的学术创伤中心进行的观察性研究。方便的样本包括16岁以上的创伤患者。5级ESI分诊由具有2-10年独家分诊经验的护士执行。国际空间站的分数是由研究人员计算的。分数的数值形式和分类形式(ISS >15)均被视为结果。最终,共有556名患者参加了这项研究。不同年龄组之间的分类不足没有差异(p = 0。51)。60岁以下和60岁及以上患者ESI水平与ISS的Spearman相关系数分别为-0.69和-0.77 (z = 1.20)。预测ISS大于15的曲线下面积(auc)在两个年龄组之间也相似(60岁以下为0.89,60岁以上为0.85)。综上所述,两个年龄组的ESI表现相似。因此,应用ESI分诊系统对创伤患者进行初步分类似乎是一种可靠且易于学习的方法,适用于老年人和低龄人群的分诊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Emergency Severity Index Triage in Iran: A Comparison Between Age Groups in a Trauma Center.

There are concerns about the accuracy of Emergency Severity Index (ESI) triage system in the geriatric population. This study was performed to compare the correlation of ESI triage with injury severity score (ISS) between adults with trauma younger than 60 years and those 60 years of age and older and to determine the ability of ESI to predict an ISS of greater than 15 in these two age groups. This was an observational study performed in an academic trauma center in Kerman, Iran. A convenience sample of trauma patients older than 16 years was included. Five-level ESI triage was performed by nurses with 2-10 years of exclusive experience in triage. The ISS scores were calculated by the researchers. Both numerical and categorical (ISS >15) forms of the score were considered as outcomes. Ultimately, a total of 556 patients were enrolled in the study. No difference in undertriage was seen between the age groups (p = 0. 51). Spearman's correlation coefficient between ESI level and ISS was -0.69 and -0.77 in patients younger than 60 years and those aged 60 years or older, respectively (z = 1.20). The areas under the curves (AUCs) for prediction of ISS of greater than 15 were also similar between the two age groups (0.89 in less than 60 and 0.85 in 60 or more). In conclusion, the performance of ESI was similar between the two age groups. Therefore, the application of the ESI triage system for initial categorization of trauma patients seems to be a reliable and easy-to-learn method for the triage of elderly as well as younger age groups.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
97
期刊介绍: Advanced Emergency Nursing Journal is a peer-reviewed journal designed to meet the needs of advanced practice clinicians, clinical nurse specialists, nurse practitioners, healthcare professionals, and clinical and academic educators in emergency nursing. Articles contain evidence-based material that can be applied to daily practice. Continuing Education opportunities are available in each issue. Feature articles focus on in-depth, state of the science content relevant to advanced practice nurses and experienced clinicians in emergency care. Ongoing Departments Include: Cases of Note Radiology Rounds Research to Practice Applied Pharmacology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信