Tobias Bomholt, Marianne Rix, Thomas Almdal, Filip K. Knop, Susanne Rosthøj, Morten B. Jørgensen, Bo Feldt-Rasmussen, Mads Hornum
{"title":"2型糖尿病维持性血液透析患者的血糖变异性：透析和非透析天数的比较。","authors":"Tobias Bomholt, Marianne Rix, Thomas Almdal, Filip K. Knop, Susanne Rosthøj, Morten B. Jørgensen, Bo Feldt-Rasmussen, Mads Hornum","doi":"10.1111/hdi.13073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Hemodialysis (HD) induces several physiological changes that can affect plasma glucose levels in patients with diabetes and in turn their glycemic control. Studies using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) to assess glucose variations on dialysis days compared with nondialysis days report conflicting results. Here, we used CGM to examine glucose variations induced by HD in patients with type 2 diabetes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Patients with type 2 diabetes undergoing maintenance HD were included. CGM (Ipro2®, Medtronic) was performed at baseline and Week 4, 8, 12, and 16 for up to 7 days at each visit. CGM profiles on days where participants received HD were compared with days without HD using a linear mixed model.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>Twenty-seven patients were included. The median number of CGM days performed was 8 (interquartile range [IQR] 6–10) for dialysis days and 16 (IQR 12–17) for nondialysis days. The median sensor glucose was 9.4 (95% confidence interval [CI] 8.8–10.2) mmol/L on dialysis days compared with 9.5 (95% CI 8.9–10.2) mmol/L on nondialysis days (<i>p</i> = 0.58). Nocturnal mean sensor glucose was higher on dialysis days compared with nondialysis days: 8.8 (95% CI 8.0–9.6) mmol/L versus 8.4 (95% CI 7.7–9.2) mmol/L (<i>p</i> = 0.029).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>Similar median sensor glucose values were found for days on and off HD. Nocturnal glucose levels were modestly increased on dialysis days. Our findings indicate that antidiabetic treatment does not need to be differentiated on dialysis versus nondialysis days in patients with type 2 diabetes undergoing maintenance HD.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12815,"journal":{"name":"Hemodialysis International","volume":"27 2","pages":"126-133"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hdi.13073","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Glucose variability in maintenance hemodialysis patients with type 2 diabetes: Comparison of dialysis and nondialysis days\",\"authors\":\"Tobias Bomholt, Marianne Rix, Thomas Almdal, Filip K. Knop, Susanne Rosthøj, Morten B. Jørgensen, Bo Feldt-Rasmussen, Mads Hornum\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/hdi.13073\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Hemodialysis (HD) induces several physiological changes that can affect plasma glucose levels in patients with diabetes and in turn their glycemic control. Studies using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) to assess glucose variations on dialysis days compared with nondialysis days report conflicting results. Here, we used CGM to examine glucose variations induced by HD in patients with type 2 diabetes.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Patients with type 2 diabetes undergoing maintenance HD were included. CGM (Ipro2®, Medtronic) was performed at baseline and Week 4, 8, 12, and 16 for up to 7 days at each visit. CGM profiles on days where participants received HD were compared with days without HD using a linear mixed model.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Findings</h3>\\n \\n <p>Twenty-seven patients were included. The median number of CGM days performed was 8 (interquartile range [IQR] 6–10) for dialysis days and 16 (IQR 12–17) for nondialysis days. The median sensor glucose was 9.4 (95% confidence interval [CI] 8.8–10.2) mmol/L on dialysis days compared with 9.5 (95% CI 8.9–10.2) mmol/L on nondialysis days (<i>p</i> = 0.58). Nocturnal mean sensor glucose was higher on dialysis days compared with nondialysis days: 8.8 (95% CI 8.0–9.6) mmol/L versus 8.4 (95% CI 7.7–9.2) mmol/L (<i>p</i> = 0.029).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Discussion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Similar median sensor glucose values were found for days on and off HD. Nocturnal glucose levels were modestly increased on dialysis days. Our findings indicate that antidiabetic treatment does not need to be differentiated on dialysis versus nondialysis days in patients with type 2 diabetes undergoing maintenance HD.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12815,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hemodialysis International\",\"volume\":\"27 2\",\"pages\":\"126-133\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hdi.13073\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hemodialysis International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hdi.13073\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hemodialysis International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hdi.13073","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Glucose variability in maintenance hemodialysis patients with type 2 diabetes: Comparison of dialysis and nondialysis days
Introduction
Hemodialysis (HD) induces several physiological changes that can affect plasma glucose levels in patients with diabetes and in turn their glycemic control. Studies using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) to assess glucose variations on dialysis days compared with nondialysis days report conflicting results. Here, we used CGM to examine glucose variations induced by HD in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Methods
Patients with type 2 diabetes undergoing maintenance HD were included. CGM (Ipro2®, Medtronic) was performed at baseline and Week 4, 8, 12, and 16 for up to 7 days at each visit. CGM profiles on days where participants received HD were compared with days without HD using a linear mixed model.
Findings
Twenty-seven patients were included. The median number of CGM days performed was 8 (interquartile range [IQR] 6–10) for dialysis days and 16 (IQR 12–17) for nondialysis days. The median sensor glucose was 9.4 (95% confidence interval [CI] 8.8–10.2) mmol/L on dialysis days compared with 9.5 (95% CI 8.9–10.2) mmol/L on nondialysis days (p = 0.58). Nocturnal mean sensor glucose was higher on dialysis days compared with nondialysis days: 8.8 (95% CI 8.0–9.6) mmol/L versus 8.4 (95% CI 7.7–9.2) mmol/L (p = 0.029).
Discussion
Similar median sensor glucose values were found for days on and off HD. Nocturnal glucose levels were modestly increased on dialysis days. Our findings indicate that antidiabetic treatment does not need to be differentiated on dialysis versus nondialysis days in patients with type 2 diabetes undergoing maintenance HD.
期刊介绍：
Hemodialysis International was originally an annual publication containing the Proceedings of the International Symposium on Hemodialysis held in conjunction with the Annual Dialysis Conference. Since 2003, Hemodialysis International is published quarterly and contains original papers on clinical and experimental topics related to dialysis in addition to the Annual Dialysis Conference supplement. This journal is a must-have for nephrologists, nurses, and technicians worldwide. Quarterly issues of Hemodialysis International are included with your membership to the International Society for Hemodialysis.
The journal contains original articles, review articles, and commentary to keep readers completely updated in the field of hemodialysis. Edited by international and multidisciplinary experts, Hemodialysis International disseminates critical information in the field.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
