预测院前损伤老年患者重大创伤的个体危险因素:一项系统综述

Abdullah Pandor, Gordon Fuller, Munira Essat, Lisa Sabir, Chris Holt, Helen Buckley Woods, Hridesh Chatha
{"title":"预测院前损伤老年患者重大创伤的个体危险因素:一项系统综述","authors":"Abdullah Pandor,&nbsp;Gordon Fuller,&nbsp;Munira Essat,&nbsp;Lisa Sabir,&nbsp;Chris Holt,&nbsp;Helen Buckley Woods,&nbsp;Hridesh Chatha","doi":"10.29045/14784726.2022.03.6.4.26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Older adults with major trauma are frequently under-triaged, increasing the risk of preventable morbidity and mortality. The aim of this systematic review was to identify which individual risk factors and predictors are likely to increase the risk of major trauma in elderly patients presenting to emergency medical services (EMS) following injury, to inform future elderly triage tool development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Several electronic databases (including Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library) were searched from inception to February 2021. Prospective or retrospective diagnostic studies were eligible if they examined a prognostic factor (often termed predictor or risk factor) for, or diagnostic test to identify, major trauma. Selection of studies, data extraction and risk of bias assessments using the Quality in Prognostic Studies (QUIPS) tool were undertaken independently by at least two reviewers. Narrative synthesis was used to summarise the findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine studies, all performed in US trauma networks, met review inclusion criteria. Vital signs (Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, systolic blood pressure, respiratory rate and shock index with specific elderly cut-off points), EMS provider judgement, comorbidities and certain crash scene variables (other occupants injured, occupant not independently mobile and head-on collision) were identified as significant pre-hospital variables associated with major trauma in the elderly in multi-variable analyses. Heart rate and anticoagulant were not significant predictors. Included studies were at moderate or high risk of bias, with applicability concerns secondary to selected study populations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Existing pre-hospital major trauma triage tools could be optimised for elderly patients by including elderly-specific physiology thresholds. Future work should focus on more relevant reference standards and further evaluation of novel elderly relevant triage tool variables and thresholds.</p>","PeriodicalId":72470,"journal":{"name":"British paramedic journal","volume":"6 4","pages":"26-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8892449/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Individual risk factors predictive of major trauma in pre-hospital injured older patients: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Abdullah Pandor,&nbsp;Gordon Fuller,&nbsp;Munira Essat,&nbsp;Lisa Sabir,&nbsp;Chris Holt,&nbsp;Helen Buckley Woods,&nbsp;Hridesh Chatha\",\"doi\":\"10.29045/14784726.2022.03.6.4.26\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Older adults with major trauma are frequently under-triaged, increasing the risk of preventable morbidity and mortality. The aim of this systematic review was to identify which individual risk factors and predictors are likely to increase the risk of major trauma in elderly patients presenting to emergency medical services (EMS) following injury, to inform future elderly triage tool development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Several electronic databases (including Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library) were searched from inception to February 2021. Prospective or retrospective diagnostic studies were eligible if they examined a prognostic factor (often termed predictor or risk factor) for, or diagnostic test to identify, major trauma. Selection of studies, data extraction and risk of bias assessments using the Quality in Prognostic Studies (QUIPS) tool were undertaken independently by at least two reviewers. Narrative synthesis was used to summarise the findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine studies, all performed in US trauma networks, met review inclusion criteria. Vital signs (Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, systolic blood pressure, respiratory rate and shock index with specific elderly cut-off points), EMS provider judgement, comorbidities and certain crash scene variables (other occupants injured, occupant not independently mobile and head-on collision) were identified as significant pre-hospital variables associated with major trauma in the elderly in multi-variable analyses. Heart rate and anticoagulant were not significant predictors. Included studies were at moderate or high risk of bias, with applicability concerns secondary to selected study populations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Existing pre-hospital major trauma triage tools could be optimised for elderly patients by including elderly-specific physiology thresholds. Future work should focus on more relevant reference standards and further evaluation of novel elderly relevant triage tool variables and thresholds.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72470,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British paramedic journal\",\"volume\":\"6 4\",\"pages\":\"26-40\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8892449/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British paramedic journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29045/14784726.2022.03.6.4.26\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British paramedic journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29045/14784726.2022.03.6.4.26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:患有严重创伤的老年人往往没有得到适当的分类,增加了可预防的发病率和死亡率的风险。本系统综述的目的是确定哪些个体危险因素和预测因素可能增加损伤后就诊于紧急医疗服务(EMS)的老年患者发生重大创伤的风险,为未来老年人分诊工具的开发提供信息。方法:检索自成立至2021年2月的Medline、EMBASE、CINAHL和Cochrane Library等多个电子数据库。前瞻性或回顾性诊断研究,如果检查了重大创伤的预后因素(通常称为预测因素或风险因素)或诊断测试,则符合条件。研究选择、数据提取和使用预后研究质量(QUIPS)工具进行偏倚风险评估由至少两名审稿人独立进行。叙述性综合用于总结研究结果。结果:9项研究均在美国创伤网络中进行,符合综述纳入标准。在多变量分析中,生命体征(格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分、收缩压、呼吸频率和休克指数,具有特定的老年人临界值)、EMS提供者的判断、合并症和某些碰撞现场变量(其他乘员受伤、乘员不能独立移动和正面碰撞)被确定为与老年人重大创伤相关的重要院前变量。心率和抗凝血剂不是显著的预测因子。纳入的研究具有中等或高度偏倚风险,适用性问题次要于选定的研究人群。结论:现有的院前重大创伤分诊工具可以通过纳入老年人特异性生理阈值来优化老年患者。未来的工作应关注更多相关的参考标准,并进一步评估新的老年人相关的分诊工具变量和阈值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Individual risk factors predictive of major trauma in pre-hospital injured older patients: a systematic review.

Individual risk factors predictive of major trauma in pre-hospital injured older patients: a systematic review.

Individual risk factors predictive of major trauma in pre-hospital injured older patients: a systematic review.

Background: Older adults with major trauma are frequently under-triaged, increasing the risk of preventable morbidity and mortality. The aim of this systematic review was to identify which individual risk factors and predictors are likely to increase the risk of major trauma in elderly patients presenting to emergency medical services (EMS) following injury, to inform future elderly triage tool development.

Methods: Several electronic databases (including Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library) were searched from inception to February 2021. Prospective or retrospective diagnostic studies were eligible if they examined a prognostic factor (often termed predictor or risk factor) for, or diagnostic test to identify, major trauma. Selection of studies, data extraction and risk of bias assessments using the Quality in Prognostic Studies (QUIPS) tool were undertaken independently by at least two reviewers. Narrative synthesis was used to summarise the findings.

Results: Nine studies, all performed in US trauma networks, met review inclusion criteria. Vital signs (Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, systolic blood pressure, respiratory rate and shock index with specific elderly cut-off points), EMS provider judgement, comorbidities and certain crash scene variables (other occupants injured, occupant not independently mobile and head-on collision) were identified as significant pre-hospital variables associated with major trauma in the elderly in multi-variable analyses. Heart rate and anticoagulant were not significant predictors. Included studies were at moderate or high risk of bias, with applicability concerns secondary to selected study populations.

Conclusions: Existing pre-hospital major trauma triage tools could be optimised for elderly patients by including elderly-specific physiology thresholds. Future work should focus on more relevant reference standards and further evaluation of novel elderly relevant triage tool variables and thresholds.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信