用集成深度学习识别130种牙种植体类型。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Hyun-Jun Kong, Sang-Ho Eom, Jin-Yong Yoo, Jun-Hyeok Lee
{"title":"用集成深度学习识别130种牙种植体类型。","authors":"Hyun-Jun Kong,&nbsp;Sang-Ho Eom,&nbsp;Jin-Yong Yoo,&nbsp;Jun-Hyeok Lee","doi":"10.11607/jomi.9818","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To evaluate the accuracy and clinical usability of an identification model using ensemble deep learning for 130 dental implant types. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> A total of 28,112 panoramic radiographs were obtained from 30 domestic and foreign dental clinics. From these panoramic radiographs, 45,909 implant fixture images were extracted and labeled based on electronic medical records. Dental implants were classified into 130 types according to the manufacturer, the manufacturer's implant system, and the diameter and length of the implant fixture. Regions of interest were manually cropped, and data augmentation was performed. According to the minimum number of images collected per implant type, the datasets were classified into three sets: an overall total of 130 and two subsets that consisted of 79 and 58 types. EfficientNet and Res2Next algorithms were used for image classification in deep learning. After testing the performance of the two models, the ensemble learning technique was applied to improve accuracy. The top-1 accuracy, top-5 accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 scores were calculated according to algorithms and datasets. <b>Results:</b> For the 130 types, the top-1 accuracy, top-5 accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 scores were 75.27, 95.02, 78.84, 75.27, and 74.89, respectively. In all cases, the ensemble model performed better than EfficientNet and Res2Next. When using the ensemble model, the accuracy increased as the number of types decreased. <b>Conclusion:</b> The ensemble deep learning model for the identification of 130 types of dental implants showed higher accuracy than the existing algorithms. To further improve the performance and clinical usability of the model, images with higher quality and fine-tuned algorithms optimized for implant identification are required.</p>","PeriodicalId":50298,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants","volume":"38 1","pages":"150-156"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identification of 130 Dental Implant Types Using Ensemble Deep Learning.\",\"authors\":\"Hyun-Jun Kong,&nbsp;Sang-Ho Eom,&nbsp;Jin-Yong Yoo,&nbsp;Jun-Hyeok Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.11607/jomi.9818\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To evaluate the accuracy and clinical usability of an identification model using ensemble deep learning for 130 dental implant types. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> A total of 28,112 panoramic radiographs were obtained from 30 domestic and foreign dental clinics. From these panoramic radiographs, 45,909 implant fixture images were extracted and labeled based on electronic medical records. Dental implants were classified into 130 types according to the manufacturer, the manufacturer's implant system, and the diameter and length of the implant fixture. Regions of interest were manually cropped, and data augmentation was performed. According to the minimum number of images collected per implant type, the datasets were classified into three sets: an overall total of 130 and two subsets that consisted of 79 and 58 types. EfficientNet and Res2Next algorithms were used for image classification in deep learning. After testing the performance of the two models, the ensemble learning technique was applied to improve accuracy. The top-1 accuracy, top-5 accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 scores were calculated according to algorithms and datasets. <b>Results:</b> For the 130 types, the top-1 accuracy, top-5 accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 scores were 75.27, 95.02, 78.84, 75.27, and 74.89, respectively. In all cases, the ensemble model performed better than EfficientNet and Res2Next. When using the ensemble model, the accuracy increased as the number of types decreased. <b>Conclusion:</b> The ensemble deep learning model for the identification of 130 types of dental implants showed higher accuracy than the existing algorithms. To further improve the performance and clinical usability of the model, images with higher quality and fine-tuned algorithms optimized for implant identification are required.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50298,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"150-156\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.9818\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.9818","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目的:评估集成深度学习识别模型对130种种植体类型的准确性和临床可用性。材料与方法:从国内外30家牙科诊所获得全景x线片28112张。从这些全景x线片中提取45909张种植体固定物图像并基于电子病历进行标记。根据生产厂家、生产厂家种植系统、种植夹具直径和长度将种植体分为130种。手动裁剪感兴趣的区域,并执行数据增强。根据每种种植体类型收集的最小图像数量,数据集分为三组:总数量为130,两个子集包括79和58种类型。深度学习中的图像分类采用了EfficientNet和Res2Next算法。在测试了两种模型的性能后,采用集成学习技术来提高准确率。根据算法和数据集计算前1名准确率、前5名准确率、精密度、召回率和F1分数。结果:130个类型的前1、前5正确率、精密度、召回率和F1得分分别为75.27、95.02、78.84、75.27和74.89。在所有情况下,集成模型都比EfficientNet和Res2Next表现得更好。当使用集成模型时,准确率随着类型数量的减少而增加。结论:集成深度学习模型对130种种植体的识别准确率高于现有算法。为了进一步提高模型的性能和临床可用性,需要更高质量的图像和针对种植体识别优化的微调算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Identification of 130 Dental Implant Types Using Ensemble Deep Learning.

Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy and clinical usability of an identification model using ensemble deep learning for 130 dental implant types. Materials and Methods: A total of 28,112 panoramic radiographs were obtained from 30 domestic and foreign dental clinics. From these panoramic radiographs, 45,909 implant fixture images were extracted and labeled based on electronic medical records. Dental implants were classified into 130 types according to the manufacturer, the manufacturer's implant system, and the diameter and length of the implant fixture. Regions of interest were manually cropped, and data augmentation was performed. According to the minimum number of images collected per implant type, the datasets were classified into three sets: an overall total of 130 and two subsets that consisted of 79 and 58 types. EfficientNet and Res2Next algorithms were used for image classification in deep learning. After testing the performance of the two models, the ensemble learning technique was applied to improve accuracy. The top-1 accuracy, top-5 accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 scores were calculated according to algorithms and datasets. Results: For the 130 types, the top-1 accuracy, top-5 accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 scores were 75.27, 95.02, 78.84, 75.27, and 74.89, respectively. In all cases, the ensemble model performed better than EfficientNet and Res2Next. When using the ensemble model, the accuracy increased as the number of types decreased. Conclusion: The ensemble deep learning model for the identification of 130 types of dental implants showed higher accuracy than the existing algorithms. To further improve the performance and clinical usability of the model, images with higher quality and fine-tuned algorithms optimized for implant identification are required.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.00%
发文量
115
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Edited by Steven E. Eckert, DDS, MS ISSN (Print): 0882-2786 ISSN (Online): 1942-4434 This highly regarded, often-cited journal integrates clinical and scientific data to improve methods and results of oral and maxillofacial implant therapy. It presents pioneering research, technology, clinical applications, reviews of the literature, seminal studies, emerging technology, position papers, and consensus studies, as well as the many clinical and therapeutic innovations that ensue as a result of these efforts. The editorial board is composed of recognized opinion leaders in their respective areas of expertise and reflects the international reach of the journal. Under their leadership, JOMI maintains its strong scientific integrity while expanding its influence within the field of implant dentistry. JOMI’s popular regular feature "Thematic Abstract Review" presents a review of abstracts of recently published articles on a specific topical area of interest each issue.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信