生物疗法对强直性脊柱炎或银屑病关节炎患者不良心血管事件风险的影响:系统文献综述

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY
ARP Rheumatology Pub Date : 2023-01-01
Konstantina Samira Magiouf, Kalliopi Fragiadaki, Adrianni Charpidou, Alexandros Syrigos, Elias Kotteas, Georgia Kourlaba
{"title":"生物疗法对强直性脊柱炎或银屑病关节炎患者不良心血管事件风险的影响:系统文献综述","authors":"Konstantina Samira Magiouf,&nbsp;Kalliopi Fragiadaki,&nbsp;Adrianni Charpidou,&nbsp;Alexandros Syrigos,&nbsp;Elias Kotteas,&nbsp;Georgia Kourlaba","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent evidence highlights increased mortality and morbidity due to cardiovascular disease (CVD), especially within the two major forms of Spondyloarthropathies (SpAs), Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) and Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA). Healthcare professionals and patients in these populations should be alerted regarding the high risk of cardiovascular (CV) events and thus, customize the treatment strategy accordingly.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic literature review aimed to determine the effects of biological therapies on serious CV events in AS and PsA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Screening for the study was carried out using PubMed and Scopus databases from the database's inception to the 17th of July 2021. The literature search strategy for this review is based on the Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcomes (PICOs) framework. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of biologic therapies for the treatment of AS and/or PsA were included. The primary outcome measure was the number of serious CV events reported during the placebo-controlled phase.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>4,422 articles were generated from keywords, eligibility criteria, and databases. Following the screening, we retained 13 studies for analysis: 3 in AS and 10 in PsA. Meta-analysis of results was not feasible due to the small number of the identified studies, the heterogeneity of the biologic treatment and the included populations, as well as the infrequently reported requested endpoint. According to our review, biologic treatments are safe options as for CV risk in patients with PsA or AS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Further and more extensive trials in AS/PsA patients at high risk of CV events are needed before firm conclusions can be drawn.</p>","PeriodicalId":29669,"journal":{"name":"ARP Rheumatology","volume":"2 1","pages":"53-63"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of biologic therapies on risk of adverse cardiovascular events in patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis or Psoriatic Arthritis: A systematic literature review.\",\"authors\":\"Konstantina Samira Magiouf,&nbsp;Kalliopi Fragiadaki,&nbsp;Adrianni Charpidou,&nbsp;Alexandros Syrigos,&nbsp;Elias Kotteas,&nbsp;Georgia Kourlaba\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent evidence highlights increased mortality and morbidity due to cardiovascular disease (CVD), especially within the two major forms of Spondyloarthropathies (SpAs), Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) and Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA). Healthcare professionals and patients in these populations should be alerted regarding the high risk of cardiovascular (CV) events and thus, customize the treatment strategy accordingly.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic literature review aimed to determine the effects of biological therapies on serious CV events in AS and PsA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Screening for the study was carried out using PubMed and Scopus databases from the database's inception to the 17th of July 2021. The literature search strategy for this review is based on the Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcomes (PICOs) framework. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of biologic therapies for the treatment of AS and/or PsA were included. The primary outcome measure was the number of serious CV events reported during the placebo-controlled phase.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>4,422 articles were generated from keywords, eligibility criteria, and databases. Following the screening, we retained 13 studies for analysis: 3 in AS and 10 in PsA. Meta-analysis of results was not feasible due to the small number of the identified studies, the heterogeneity of the biologic treatment and the included populations, as well as the infrequently reported requested endpoint. According to our review, biologic treatments are safe options as for CV risk in patients with PsA or AS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Further and more extensive trials in AS/PsA patients at high risk of CV events are needed before firm conclusions can be drawn.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29669,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ARP Rheumatology\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"53-63\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ARP Rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARP Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:最近的证据强调心血管疾病(CVD)导致的死亡率和发病率增加,特别是在两种主要形式的脊椎关节病(spa)中,强直性脊柱炎(AS)和银屑病关节炎(PsA)。这些人群中的医疗保健专业人员和患者应该警惕心血管(CV)事件的高风险,从而相应地定制治疗策略。目的:本系统文献综述旨在确定生物疗法对AS和PsA严重心血管事件的影响。方法:从PubMed和Scopus数据库建立至2021年7月17日,对该研究进行筛选。本综述的文献检索策略基于人群、干预、比较者、结果(PICOs)框架。纳入了生物疗法治疗AS和/或PsA的随机对照试验(rct)。主要结局指标是在安慰剂对照期报告的严重心血管事件的数量。结果:从关键词、资格标准和数据库中生成了4,422篇文章。在筛选之后,我们保留了13项研究进行分析:3项关于AS, 10项关于PsA。由于确定的研究数量少,生物治疗和纳入人群的异质性,以及很少报告要求的终点,结果的荟萃分析是不可行的。根据我们的综述,对于PsA或as患者的心血管风险,生物治疗是安全的选择。结论:在得出确切的结论之前,需要对心血管事件高风险的AS/PsA患者进行进一步和更广泛的试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of biologic therapies on risk of adverse cardiovascular events in patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis or Psoriatic Arthritis: A systematic literature review.

Background: Recent evidence highlights increased mortality and morbidity due to cardiovascular disease (CVD), especially within the two major forms of Spondyloarthropathies (SpAs), Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) and Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA). Healthcare professionals and patients in these populations should be alerted regarding the high risk of cardiovascular (CV) events and thus, customize the treatment strategy accordingly.

Objective: This systematic literature review aimed to determine the effects of biological therapies on serious CV events in AS and PsA.

Methods: Screening for the study was carried out using PubMed and Scopus databases from the database's inception to the 17th of July 2021. The literature search strategy for this review is based on the Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcomes (PICOs) framework. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of biologic therapies for the treatment of AS and/or PsA were included. The primary outcome measure was the number of serious CV events reported during the placebo-controlled phase.

Results: 4,422 articles were generated from keywords, eligibility criteria, and databases. Following the screening, we retained 13 studies for analysis: 3 in AS and 10 in PsA. Meta-analysis of results was not feasible due to the small number of the identified studies, the heterogeneity of the biologic treatment and the included populations, as well as the infrequently reported requested endpoint. According to our review, biologic treatments are safe options as for CV risk in patients with PsA or AS.

Conclusion: Further and more extensive trials in AS/PsA patients at high risk of CV events are needed before firm conclusions can be drawn.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信