心肌梗塞潜在诱因的性别差异。

European Heart Journal Open Pub Date : 2023-02-16 eCollection Date: 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1093/ehjopen/oead011
Anneli Olsson, Moman A Mohammad, Rebecca Rylance, Pyotr G Platonov, David Sparv, David Erlinge
{"title":"心肌梗塞潜在诱因的性别差异。","authors":"Anneli Olsson, Moman A Mohammad, Rebecca Rylance, Pyotr G Platonov, David Sparv, David Erlinge","doi":"10.1093/ehjopen/oead011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Internal and external triggers affect seasonal and circadian variations of myocardial infarction (MI). We aimed to assess sex differences in the common triggers of MI.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>A nationwide, retrospective, cross-sectional postal survey study was conducted. Individuals who experienced a MI during holidays and weekdays were identified through the SWEDEHEART registry. Twenty-seven potential MI triggers were rated in regards to occurring more or less than usual during the last 24 h before the MI. Three areas were covered: activities, emotions, and food or alcohol consumption. A logistic regression model was used to identify sex differences for each trigger and odds ratios (ORs) were reported. Four hundred and fifty-one patients, of whom 317 were men, responded. The most commonly reported triggers were stress (35.3%), worry (26.2%), depression (21.1%), and insomnia (20.0%). Women reported emotional triggers including sadness [OR 3.52, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.92-6.45], stress (OR 2.38, 95% CI 1.52-3.71), insomnia (OR 2.31, 95% CI 1.39-3.81), and upset (OR 2.69, 95% CI 1.47-4.95) to a greater extent than men. Outdoor activity was less reported by women (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.14-0.87). No significant sex differences were found in other activities or food and alcohol consumption.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Self-experienced stress and distress were higher among women prior to MI compared with men. Understanding sex perspectives in acute triggers may help us find preventive strategies and reduce the excess numbers of MI.</p>","PeriodicalId":11973,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/3f/69/oead011.PMC10063195.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sex differences in potential triggers of myocardial infarction.\",\"authors\":\"Anneli Olsson, Moman A Mohammad, Rebecca Rylance, Pyotr G Platonov, David Sparv, David Erlinge\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ehjopen/oead011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Internal and external triggers affect seasonal and circadian variations of myocardial infarction (MI). We aimed to assess sex differences in the common triggers of MI.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>A nationwide, retrospective, cross-sectional postal survey study was conducted. Individuals who experienced a MI during holidays and weekdays were identified through the SWEDEHEART registry. Twenty-seven potential MI triggers were rated in regards to occurring more or less than usual during the last 24 h before the MI. Three areas were covered: activities, emotions, and food or alcohol consumption. A logistic regression model was used to identify sex differences for each trigger and odds ratios (ORs) were reported. Four hundred and fifty-one patients, of whom 317 were men, responded. The most commonly reported triggers were stress (35.3%), worry (26.2%), depression (21.1%), and insomnia (20.0%). Women reported emotional triggers including sadness [OR 3.52, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.92-6.45], stress (OR 2.38, 95% CI 1.52-3.71), insomnia (OR 2.31, 95% CI 1.39-3.81), and upset (OR 2.69, 95% CI 1.47-4.95) to a greater extent than men. Outdoor activity was less reported by women (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.14-0.87). No significant sex differences were found in other activities or food and alcohol consumption.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Self-experienced stress and distress were higher among women prior to MI compared with men. Understanding sex perspectives in acute triggers may help us find preventive strategies and reduce the excess numbers of MI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11973,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Heart Journal Open\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/3f/69/oead011.PMC10063195.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Heart Journal Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjopen/oead011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjopen/oead011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:内部和外部诱因会影响心肌梗死(MI)的季节和昼夜变化。我们旨在评估心肌梗死常见诱因的性别差异:我们在全国范围内开展了一项回顾性横断面邮寄调查研究。通过 SWEDEHEART 登记册确定了在节假日和工作日发生心肌梗死的个人。对 27 种潜在的心肌梗塞诱因进行了评定,看其在心肌梗塞发生前 24 小时内发生的次数比平时多或少。其中包括三个方面:活动、情绪、进食或饮酒。采用逻辑回归模型确定了每种诱因的性别差异,并报告了几率比(OR)。共有 451 名患者做出了回应,其中 317 人为男性。最常报告的诱发因素是压力(35.3%)、担忧(26.2%)、抑郁(21.1%)和失眠(20.0%)。女性报告的情绪诱因包括悲伤[OR 3.52,95% 置信区间(CI)1.92-6.45]、压力(OR 2.38,95% CI 1.52-3.71)、失眠(OR 2.31,95% CI 1.39-3.81)和心烦意乱(OR 2.69,95% CI 1.47-4.95),女性报告的程度高于男性。女性较少报告户外活动(OR 0.35,95% CI 0.14-0.87)。在其他活动、饮食和饮酒方面没有发现明显的性别差异:结论:与男性相比,女性在发生心肌梗死前的自我压力和痛苦体验更高。了解急性诱发因素的性别差异有助于我们找到预防策略,减少心肌梗死的高发率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Sex differences in potential triggers of myocardial infarction.

Sex differences in potential triggers of myocardial infarction.

Sex differences in potential triggers of myocardial infarction.

Sex differences in potential triggers of myocardial infarction.

Aims: Internal and external triggers affect seasonal and circadian variations of myocardial infarction (MI). We aimed to assess sex differences in the common triggers of MI.

Methods and results: A nationwide, retrospective, cross-sectional postal survey study was conducted. Individuals who experienced a MI during holidays and weekdays were identified through the SWEDEHEART registry. Twenty-seven potential MI triggers were rated in regards to occurring more or less than usual during the last 24 h before the MI. Three areas were covered: activities, emotions, and food or alcohol consumption. A logistic regression model was used to identify sex differences for each trigger and odds ratios (ORs) were reported. Four hundred and fifty-one patients, of whom 317 were men, responded. The most commonly reported triggers were stress (35.3%), worry (26.2%), depression (21.1%), and insomnia (20.0%). Women reported emotional triggers including sadness [OR 3.52, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.92-6.45], stress (OR 2.38, 95% CI 1.52-3.71), insomnia (OR 2.31, 95% CI 1.39-3.81), and upset (OR 2.69, 95% CI 1.47-4.95) to a greater extent than men. Outdoor activity was less reported by women (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.14-0.87). No significant sex differences were found in other activities or food and alcohol consumption.

Conclusion: Self-experienced stress and distress were higher among women prior to MI compared with men. Understanding sex perspectives in acute triggers may help us find preventive strategies and reduce the excess numbers of MI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信