危重患者刺激诱发的节律性、周期性或突发性放电(SIRPIDs)及其与非惊厥性癫痫持续状态的关系

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Francesco Capecchi, Andrea di Giacopo, Emanuela Keller, Ian Mothershill, Lukas L Imbach
{"title":"危重患者刺激诱发的节律性、周期性或突发性放电(SIRPIDs)及其与非惊厥性癫痫持续状态的关系","authors":"Francesco Capecchi,&nbsp;Andrea di Giacopo,&nbsp;Emanuela Keller,&nbsp;Ian Mothershill,&nbsp;Lukas L Imbach","doi":"10.1177/15500594221095434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Stimulus induced repetitive periodic or ictal discharges (SIRPIDs) are a commonly observed EEG pattern in critically ill patients. However, the epileptic significance of SIRPIDs remain unclear. We identified and reviewed 55 cases with SIRPIDs according to the ACNS criteria. SIRPIDs occurred after standardized painful stimuli during a standard 20-minute EEG. These cases were investigated regarding their relation to non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) according to Salzburg Consensus Criteria and in-hospital mortality. In 37/55 patients (67.3%), SIRPIDs were associated with NCSE. In most patients (26/37 cases, 70.3%) with concurrent status epilepticus, SIRPIDs occurred after status epilepticus (on average 4.8 days later), but in 3/37 patients (8.1%) they were observed before a later status epilepticus. In four cases (4/37 cases, 10.8%), SIRPIDs appeared both before and after an episode of NCSE and in other four cases the two patterns coexisted in the same EEG. In 50% of the patients, status epilepticus was refractory, super-refractory or the patient died before its resolution. The overall mortality in the cohort was high at 58.2%. These findings corroborate the hypothesis that SIRPIDs might represent a state with increased epileptogenic potential, commonly co-occurring with NCSE. Furthermore, SIRPIDs are associated with therapy-refractory course of status epilepticus and high mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":10682,"journal":{"name":"Clinical EEG and Neuroscience","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10084515/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stimulus Induced Rhythmic, Periodic, or Ictal Discharges (SIRPIDs) and its Association with Non-convulsive Status Epilepticus in Critically Ill Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Francesco Capecchi,&nbsp;Andrea di Giacopo,&nbsp;Emanuela Keller,&nbsp;Ian Mothershill,&nbsp;Lukas L Imbach\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15500594221095434\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Stimulus induced repetitive periodic or ictal discharges (SIRPIDs) are a commonly observed EEG pattern in critically ill patients. However, the epileptic significance of SIRPIDs remain unclear. We identified and reviewed 55 cases with SIRPIDs according to the ACNS criteria. SIRPIDs occurred after standardized painful stimuli during a standard 20-minute EEG. These cases were investigated regarding their relation to non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) according to Salzburg Consensus Criteria and in-hospital mortality. In 37/55 patients (67.3%), SIRPIDs were associated with NCSE. In most patients (26/37 cases, 70.3%) with concurrent status epilepticus, SIRPIDs occurred after status epilepticus (on average 4.8 days later), but in 3/37 patients (8.1%) they were observed before a later status epilepticus. In four cases (4/37 cases, 10.8%), SIRPIDs appeared both before and after an episode of NCSE and in other four cases the two patterns coexisted in the same EEG. In 50% of the patients, status epilepticus was refractory, super-refractory or the patient died before its resolution. The overall mortality in the cohort was high at 58.2%. These findings corroborate the hypothesis that SIRPIDs might represent a state with increased epileptogenic potential, commonly co-occurring with NCSE. Furthermore, SIRPIDs are associated with therapy-refractory course of status epilepticus and high mortality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10682,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical EEG and Neuroscience\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10084515/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical EEG and Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15500594221095434\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical EEG and Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15500594221095434","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

刺激诱发的重复周期性放电(SIRPIDs)是危重患者常见的脑电图模式。然而,sirpid的癫痫意义尚不清楚。我们根据ACNS标准鉴定并回顾了55例sirpid病例。在标准的20分钟脑电图中,在标准化的疼痛刺激后发生sirpid。根据萨尔茨堡共识标准和住院死亡率调查这些病例与非惊厥性癫痫持续状态(NCSE)的关系。在37/55例(67.3%)患者中,sirpid与NCSE相关。在并发癫痫持续状态的大多数患者(26/37例,70.3%)中,SIRPIDs发生在癫痫持续状态后(平均4.8天后),但在3/37例患者(8.1%)中,SIRPIDs发生在较晚的癫痫持续状态之前。4例(4/37,10.8%)SIRPIDs在NCSE发作前后同时出现,另外4例在同一脑电图中同时出现。50%的患者癫痫持续状态为难治性、超难治性或患者在缓解前死亡。该队列的总死亡率高达58.2%。这些发现证实了SIRPIDs可能代表一种癫痫发生潜力增加的状态,通常与NCSE共同发生的假设。此外,sirpid与治疗难治性癫痫持续状态和高死亡率有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Stimulus Induced Rhythmic, Periodic, or Ictal Discharges (SIRPIDs) and its Association with Non-convulsive Status Epilepticus in Critically Ill Patients.

Stimulus Induced Rhythmic, Periodic, or Ictal Discharges (SIRPIDs) and its Association with Non-convulsive Status Epilepticus in Critically Ill Patients.

Stimulus Induced Rhythmic, Periodic, or Ictal Discharges (SIRPIDs) and its Association with Non-convulsive Status Epilepticus in Critically Ill Patients.

Stimulus Induced Rhythmic, Periodic, or Ictal Discharges (SIRPIDs) and its Association with Non-convulsive Status Epilepticus in Critically Ill Patients.

Stimulus induced repetitive periodic or ictal discharges (SIRPIDs) are a commonly observed EEG pattern in critically ill patients. However, the epileptic significance of SIRPIDs remain unclear. We identified and reviewed 55 cases with SIRPIDs according to the ACNS criteria. SIRPIDs occurred after standardized painful stimuli during a standard 20-minute EEG. These cases were investigated regarding their relation to non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) according to Salzburg Consensus Criteria and in-hospital mortality. In 37/55 patients (67.3%), SIRPIDs were associated with NCSE. In most patients (26/37 cases, 70.3%) with concurrent status epilepticus, SIRPIDs occurred after status epilepticus (on average 4.8 days later), but in 3/37 patients (8.1%) they were observed before a later status epilepticus. In four cases (4/37 cases, 10.8%), SIRPIDs appeared both before and after an episode of NCSE and in other four cases the two patterns coexisted in the same EEG. In 50% of the patients, status epilepticus was refractory, super-refractory or the patient died before its resolution. The overall mortality in the cohort was high at 58.2%. These findings corroborate the hypothesis that SIRPIDs might represent a state with increased epileptogenic potential, commonly co-occurring with NCSE. Furthermore, SIRPIDs are associated with therapy-refractory course of status epilepticus and high mortality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical EEG and Neuroscience
Clinical EEG and Neuroscience 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical EEG and Neuroscience conveys clinically relevant research and development in electroencephalography and neuroscience. Original articles on any aspect of clinical neurophysiology or related work in allied fields are invited for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信