{"title":"不相信自己应该好转的抑郁症患者:患病率、临床特征和治疗结果。","authors":"Mark Zimmerman, Lena Becker","doi":"10.12788/acp.0098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of the present report from the Rhode Island Methods to Improve Diagnostic Assessment and Services (MIDAS) project was to examine the demographic and clinical features that distinguished depressed patients who did and did not indicate they deserved to feel better.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 490 depressed patients completed a clinical history questionnaire that included a question about whether the patient thought they deserved to feel better, as well as a self-report questionnaire assessing symptoms, positive mental health, coping ability, functioning, and well-being.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Approximately 20% of patients indicated they were unsure or undeserving of feeling better. Patients who did not believe they deserved to get better reported more cognitive symptoms of depression, were more likely to drop out of treatment due to nonattendance, more pessimistic about outcomes upon treatment initiation, more frequently reported suicidal ideation, more frequently reported a history of multiple suicide attempts, and experienced less improvement in their depressive symptoms during treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A meaningful number of depressed patients seeking treatment did not assert that they deserved to feel better. Efforts to treat individuals who do not believe they deserve to feel better may be less productive if this perspective is not addressed.</p>","PeriodicalId":50770,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Clinical Psychiatry","volume":"35 1","pages":"77-86"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Depressed patients who do not believe they deserve to get better: Prevalence, clinical characteristics, and treatment outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Mark Zimmerman, Lena Becker\",\"doi\":\"10.12788/acp.0098\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of the present report from the Rhode Island Methods to Improve Diagnostic Assessment and Services (MIDAS) project was to examine the demographic and clinical features that distinguished depressed patients who did and did not indicate they deserved to feel better.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 490 depressed patients completed a clinical history questionnaire that included a question about whether the patient thought they deserved to feel better, as well as a self-report questionnaire assessing symptoms, positive mental health, coping ability, functioning, and well-being.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Approximately 20% of patients indicated they were unsure or undeserving of feeling better. Patients who did not believe they deserved to get better reported more cognitive symptoms of depression, were more likely to drop out of treatment due to nonattendance, more pessimistic about outcomes upon treatment initiation, more frequently reported suicidal ideation, more frequently reported a history of multiple suicide attempts, and experienced less improvement in their depressive symptoms during treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A meaningful number of depressed patients seeking treatment did not assert that they deserved to feel better. Efforts to treat individuals who do not believe they deserve to feel better may be less productive if this perspective is not addressed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50770,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Clinical Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"77-86\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Clinical Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12788/acp.0098\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Clinical Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12788/acp.0098","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Depressed patients who do not believe they deserve to get better: Prevalence, clinical characteristics, and treatment outcomes.
Background: The aim of the present report from the Rhode Island Methods to Improve Diagnostic Assessment and Services (MIDAS) project was to examine the demographic and clinical features that distinguished depressed patients who did and did not indicate they deserved to feel better.
Methods: A total of 490 depressed patients completed a clinical history questionnaire that included a question about whether the patient thought they deserved to feel better, as well as a self-report questionnaire assessing symptoms, positive mental health, coping ability, functioning, and well-being.
Results: Approximately 20% of patients indicated they were unsure or undeserving of feeling better. Patients who did not believe they deserved to get better reported more cognitive symptoms of depression, were more likely to drop out of treatment due to nonattendance, more pessimistic about outcomes upon treatment initiation, more frequently reported suicidal ideation, more frequently reported a history of multiple suicide attempts, and experienced less improvement in their depressive symptoms during treatment.
Conclusions: A meaningful number of depressed patients seeking treatment did not assert that they deserved to feel better. Efforts to treat individuals who do not believe they deserve to feel better may be less productive if this perspective is not addressed.
期刊介绍:
The ANNALS publishes up-to-date information regarding the diagnosis and /or treatment of persons with mental disorders. Preferred manuscripts are those that report the results of controlled clinical trials, timely and thorough evidence-based reviews, letters to the editor, and case reports that present new appraisals of pertinent clinical topics.