Kaitlyn T Marks, Nara S Higano, Meera Kotagal, Jason C Woods, Paul S Kingma
{"title":"基于磁共振成像的食道闭锁婴儿解剖学评估和结果预测。","authors":"Kaitlyn T Marks, Nara S Higano, Meera Kotagal, Jason C Woods, Paul S Kingma","doi":"10.1159/000526794","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There is currently no validated diagnostic modality to characterize the anatomy and predict outcomes of tracheal esophageal defects, such as esophageal atresia (EA) and tracheal esophageal fistulas (TEFs). We hypothesized that ultra-short echo-time MRI would provide enhanced anatomic information allowing for evaluation of specific EA/TEF anatomy and identification of risk factors that predict outcome in infants with EA/TEF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this observational study, 11 infants had pre-repair ultra-short echo-time MRI of the chest completed. Esophageal size was measured at the widest point distal to the epiglottis and proximal to the carina. Angle of tracheal deviation was measured by identifying the initial point of deviation and the farthest lateral point proximal to the carina.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Infants without a proximal TEF had a larger proximal esophageal diameter (13.5 ± 5.1 mm vs. 6.8 ± 2.1 mm, p = 0.07) when compared to infants with a proximal TEF. The angle of tracheal deviation in infants without a proximal TEF was larger than infants with a proximal TEF (16.1 ± 6.1° vs. 8.2 ± 5.4°, p = 0.09) and controls (16.1 ± 6.1° vs. 8.0 ± 3.1°, p = 0.005). An increase in the angle of tracheal deviation was positively correlated with duration of post-operative mechanical ventilation (Pearson r = 0.83, p < 0.002) and total duration of post-operative respiratory support (Pearson r = 0.80, p = 0.004).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These results demonstrate that infants without a proximal TEF have a larger proximal esophagus and a greater angle of tracheal deviation which is directly correlated with the need for longer post-operative respiratory support. Additionally, these results demonstrate that MRI is a useful tool to assess the anatomy of EA/TEF.</p>","PeriodicalId":18924,"journal":{"name":"Neonatology","volume":"120 2","pages":"185-195"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10118939/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Evaluation of Anatomy and Outcome Prediction in Infants with Esophageal Atresia.\",\"authors\":\"Kaitlyn T Marks, Nara S Higano, Meera Kotagal, Jason C Woods, Paul S Kingma\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000526794\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There is currently no validated diagnostic modality to characterize the anatomy and predict outcomes of tracheal esophageal defects, such as esophageal atresia (EA) and tracheal esophageal fistulas (TEFs). We hypothesized that ultra-short echo-time MRI would provide enhanced anatomic information allowing for evaluation of specific EA/TEF anatomy and identification of risk factors that predict outcome in infants with EA/TEF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this observational study, 11 infants had pre-repair ultra-short echo-time MRI of the chest completed. Esophageal size was measured at the widest point distal to the epiglottis and proximal to the carina. Angle of tracheal deviation was measured by identifying the initial point of deviation and the farthest lateral point proximal to the carina.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Infants without a proximal TEF had a larger proximal esophageal diameter (13.5 ± 5.1 mm vs. 6.8 ± 2.1 mm, p = 0.07) when compared to infants with a proximal TEF. The angle of tracheal deviation in infants without a proximal TEF was larger than infants with a proximal TEF (16.1 ± 6.1° vs. 8.2 ± 5.4°, p = 0.09) and controls (16.1 ± 6.1° vs. 8.0 ± 3.1°, p = 0.005). An increase in the angle of tracheal deviation was positively correlated with duration of post-operative mechanical ventilation (Pearson r = 0.83, p < 0.002) and total duration of post-operative respiratory support (Pearson r = 0.80, p = 0.004).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These results demonstrate that infants without a proximal TEF have a larger proximal esophagus and a greater angle of tracheal deviation which is directly correlated with the need for longer post-operative respiratory support. Additionally, these results demonstrate that MRI is a useful tool to assess the anatomy of EA/TEF.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18924,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neonatology\",\"volume\":\"120 2\",\"pages\":\"185-195\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10118939/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neonatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000526794\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/2/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neonatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000526794","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/2/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言:目前还没有一种有效的诊断方法来描述气管食管缺陷(如食管闭锁(EA)和气管食管瘘(TEF))的解剖特征并预测其预后。我们假设超短回波时间核磁共振成像能提供更强的解剖信息,从而评估特定的 EA/TEF 解剖结构,并确定预测 EA/TEF 婴儿预后的风险因素:在这项观察性研究中,11 名婴儿完成了修复前胸部超短回波磁共振成像。在会厌远端和心尖近端最宽处测量食管大小。气管偏离角度的测量方法是确定气管偏离的初始点和心尖近端最外侧点:结果:与有近端 TEF 的婴儿相比,没有近端 TEF 的婴儿食管近端直径更大(13.5 ± 5.1 mm vs. 6.8 ± 2.1 mm,p = 0.07)。与有近端 TEF 的婴儿(16.1 ± 6.1° vs. 8.2 ± 5.4°,p = 0.09)和对照组(16.1 ± 6.1° vs. 8.0 ± 3.1°,p = 0.005)相比,没有近端 TEF 的婴儿气管偏离角度更大。气管偏离角度的增加与术后机械通气持续时间(Pearson r = 0.83,p < 0.002)和术后呼吸支持总持续时间(Pearson r = 0.80,p = 0.004)呈正相关:这些结果表明,没有近端 TEF 的婴儿近端食管较大,气管偏离角度较大,这与术后需要更长时间的呼吸支持直接相关。此外,这些结果还证明核磁共振成像是评估 EA/TEF 解剖结构的有用工具。
Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Evaluation of Anatomy and Outcome Prediction in Infants with Esophageal Atresia.
Introduction: There is currently no validated diagnostic modality to characterize the anatomy and predict outcomes of tracheal esophageal defects, such as esophageal atresia (EA) and tracheal esophageal fistulas (TEFs). We hypothesized that ultra-short echo-time MRI would provide enhanced anatomic information allowing for evaluation of specific EA/TEF anatomy and identification of risk factors that predict outcome in infants with EA/TEF.
Methods: In this observational study, 11 infants had pre-repair ultra-short echo-time MRI of the chest completed. Esophageal size was measured at the widest point distal to the epiglottis and proximal to the carina. Angle of tracheal deviation was measured by identifying the initial point of deviation and the farthest lateral point proximal to the carina.
Results: Infants without a proximal TEF had a larger proximal esophageal diameter (13.5 ± 5.1 mm vs. 6.8 ± 2.1 mm, p = 0.07) when compared to infants with a proximal TEF. The angle of tracheal deviation in infants without a proximal TEF was larger than infants with a proximal TEF (16.1 ± 6.1° vs. 8.2 ± 5.4°, p = 0.09) and controls (16.1 ± 6.1° vs. 8.0 ± 3.1°, p = 0.005). An increase in the angle of tracheal deviation was positively correlated with duration of post-operative mechanical ventilation (Pearson r = 0.83, p < 0.002) and total duration of post-operative respiratory support (Pearson r = 0.80, p = 0.004).
Discussion: These results demonstrate that infants without a proximal TEF have a larger proximal esophagus and a greater angle of tracheal deviation which is directly correlated with the need for longer post-operative respiratory support. Additionally, these results demonstrate that MRI is a useful tool to assess the anatomy of EA/TEF.
期刊介绍:
This highly respected and frequently cited journal is a prime source of information in the area of fetal and neonatal research. Original papers present research on all aspects of neonatology, fetal medicine and developmental biology. These papers encompass both basic science and clinical research including randomized trials, observational studies and epidemiology. Basic science research covers molecular biology, molecular genetics, physiology, biochemistry and pharmacology in fetal and neonatal life. In addition to the classic features the journal accepts papers for the sections Research Briefings and Sources of Neonatal Medicine (historical pieces). Papers reporting results of animal studies should be based upon hypotheses that relate to developmental processes or disorders in the human fetus or neonate.