不同调制通信对年轻人群中covid-19大流行的影响。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
Cesare Maria Cornaggia, Pietro G Lovaglio, Michele A Riva, Miryam Mazzucchelli, Daniele Piscitelli, Giorgio Vittadini
{"title":"不同调制通信对年轻人群中covid-19大流行的影响。","authors":"Cesare Maria Cornaggia,&nbsp;Pietro G Lovaglio,&nbsp;Michele A Riva,&nbsp;Miryam Mazzucchelli,&nbsp;Daniele Piscitelli,&nbsp;Giorgio Vittadini","doi":"10.1708/4022.39974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Media communication during the covid-19 pandemic has been relevant for the population to receive information about the ongoing number of cases, deaths, and social restriction measures. Notably, the effects of the communication methods on young adults during the covid-19 pandemic have not been studied. Therefore the present study aimed to investigate the influence of communication modality about covid-19 on the perception of risk and judgment among young adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A double-blind cross-sectional study was designed. Three hundred four subjects (age range19-25 years old) saw a 4-minute video concerning data communication on the covid-19 pandemic and compiled an online questionnaire about their perceptions. Two videos were randomized, one presenting the covid-19 data negatively (HARD video) while the other showed a positive ongoing resolution of the pandemic (SOFT video). Association tests and nominal logistic regression were used to evaluate differences in responses among the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The two videos lead to different reactions. Participants showed higher disagreement concerning the video content in the \"SOFT\" group compared to the \"HARD\" group. The responses of the \"SOFT\" group were more to be optimistic (OR=2.87, 95% CI 1.311-6.27) than those who had seen the \"HARD\" video. The sense of helplessness was lower in the \"SOFT\" compared \"HARD\" group (OR=3.02, 95% CI 1.311-6.96). The perception of fear was higher for the \"HARD\" group (OR=2.91, 95% CI 1.21-7-02).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The modality of data presentation influenced the perception and feelings about the covid-19 pandemic. Likely, pre-existing perception of a pessimistic perspective was present in both groups; thus, the video did not lead to any change in the behavior.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The phobic or counter-phobic reactions shown in the study participants highlighted the importance of the reliability of the information received and how previous feelings may influence the perception of the information.</p>","PeriodicalId":21506,"journal":{"name":"Rivista di psichiatria","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of differently modulated communications on the covid-19 pandemic in the young population.\",\"authors\":\"Cesare Maria Cornaggia,&nbsp;Pietro G Lovaglio,&nbsp;Michele A Riva,&nbsp;Miryam Mazzucchelli,&nbsp;Daniele Piscitelli,&nbsp;Giorgio Vittadini\",\"doi\":\"10.1708/4022.39974\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Media communication during the covid-19 pandemic has been relevant for the population to receive information about the ongoing number of cases, deaths, and social restriction measures. Notably, the effects of the communication methods on young adults during the covid-19 pandemic have not been studied. Therefore the present study aimed to investigate the influence of communication modality about covid-19 on the perception of risk and judgment among young adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A double-blind cross-sectional study was designed. Three hundred four subjects (age range19-25 years old) saw a 4-minute video concerning data communication on the covid-19 pandemic and compiled an online questionnaire about their perceptions. Two videos were randomized, one presenting the covid-19 data negatively (HARD video) while the other showed a positive ongoing resolution of the pandemic (SOFT video). Association tests and nominal logistic regression were used to evaluate differences in responses among the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The two videos lead to different reactions. Participants showed higher disagreement concerning the video content in the \\\"SOFT\\\" group compared to the \\\"HARD\\\" group. The responses of the \\\"SOFT\\\" group were more to be optimistic (OR=2.87, 95% CI 1.311-6.27) than those who had seen the \\\"HARD\\\" video. The sense of helplessness was lower in the \\\"SOFT\\\" compared \\\"HARD\\\" group (OR=3.02, 95% CI 1.311-6.96). The perception of fear was higher for the \\\"HARD\\\" group (OR=2.91, 95% CI 1.21-7-02).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The modality of data presentation influenced the perception and feelings about the covid-19 pandemic. Likely, pre-existing perception of a pessimistic perspective was present in both groups; thus, the video did not lead to any change in the behavior.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The phobic or counter-phobic reactions shown in the study participants highlighted the importance of the reliability of the information received and how previous feelings may influence the perception of the information.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21506,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rivista di psichiatria\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rivista di psichiatria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1708/4022.39974\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rivista di psichiatria","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1708/4022.39974","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:2019冠状病毒病大流行期间的媒体传播与民众获取有关持续病例数、死亡人数和社会限制措施的信息有关。值得注意的是,在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,沟通方式对年轻人的影响尚未得到研究。因此,本研究旨在探讨新冠肺炎传播方式对年轻人风险感知和判断的影响。方法:设计双盲横断面研究。340名受试者(年龄在19-25岁之间)观看了一段关于covid-19大流行数据交流的4分钟视频,并编制了一份关于他们看法的在线问卷。随机选取两个视频,一个是负面的covid-19数据(硬视频),另一个是积极的大流行持续解决(软视频)。使用关联检验和名义逻辑回归来评估两组之间反应的差异。结果:两个视频引起不同的反应。与“硬”组相比,“软”组的参与者对视频内容的不一致程度更高。“软”组的反应比那些看过“硬”视频的人更乐观(OR=2.87, 95% CI 1.311-6.27)。“软”组的无助感较“硬”组低(OR=3.02, 95% CI 1.311-6.96)。“硬”组的恐惧感知更高(OR=2.91, 95% CI 1.21-7-02)。讨论:数据呈现方式影响对covid-19大流行的认知和感受。很可能,两组人都存在预先存在的悲观观点;因此,视频并没有导致行为的任何改变。结论:研究参与者的恐惧或反恐惧反应突出了所接收信息可靠性的重要性,以及先前的感受如何影响对信息的感知。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effect of differently modulated communications on the covid-19 pandemic in the young population.

Background: Media communication during the covid-19 pandemic has been relevant for the population to receive information about the ongoing number of cases, deaths, and social restriction measures. Notably, the effects of the communication methods on young adults during the covid-19 pandemic have not been studied. Therefore the present study aimed to investigate the influence of communication modality about covid-19 on the perception of risk and judgment among young adults.

Methods: A double-blind cross-sectional study was designed. Three hundred four subjects (age range19-25 years old) saw a 4-minute video concerning data communication on the covid-19 pandemic and compiled an online questionnaire about their perceptions. Two videos were randomized, one presenting the covid-19 data negatively (HARD video) while the other showed a positive ongoing resolution of the pandemic (SOFT video). Association tests and nominal logistic regression were used to evaluate differences in responses among the two groups.

Results: The two videos lead to different reactions. Participants showed higher disagreement concerning the video content in the "SOFT" group compared to the "HARD" group. The responses of the "SOFT" group were more to be optimistic (OR=2.87, 95% CI 1.311-6.27) than those who had seen the "HARD" video. The sense of helplessness was lower in the "SOFT" compared "HARD" group (OR=3.02, 95% CI 1.311-6.96). The perception of fear was higher for the "HARD" group (OR=2.91, 95% CI 1.21-7-02).

Discussion: The modality of data presentation influenced the perception and feelings about the covid-19 pandemic. Likely, pre-existing perception of a pessimistic perspective was present in both groups; thus, the video did not lead to any change in the behavior.

Conclusions: The phobic or counter-phobic reactions shown in the study participants highlighted the importance of the reliability of the information received and how previous feelings may influence the perception of the information.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Rivista di psichiatria
Rivista di psichiatria 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.70%
发文量
31
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Gli interessi della rivista riguardano l’approfondimento delle interazioni tra mente e malattia, la validazione e la discussione dei nuovi strumenti e parametri di classificazione diagnostica, la verifica delle prospettive terapeutiche farmacologiche e non.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信