解决和评估移动医疗中的健康素养:范围审查。

IF 2.2 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
mHealth Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.21037/mhealth-22-11
Margaret R Emerson, Sydney Buckland, Maxwell A Lawlor, Danae Dinkel, David J Johnson, Maria S Mickles, Louis Fok, Shinobu Watanabe-Galloway
{"title":"解决和评估移动医疗中的健康素养:范围审查。","authors":"Margaret R Emerson,&nbsp;Sydney Buckland,&nbsp;Maxwell A Lawlor,&nbsp;Danae Dinkel,&nbsp;David J Johnson,&nbsp;Maria S Mickles,&nbsp;Louis Fok,&nbsp;Shinobu Watanabe-Galloway","doi":"10.21037/mhealth-22-11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent surveys have revealed many adults have basic or below basic health literacy, which is linked to medical errors, increased illness, and compromised public health. Health literacy as a concept is multi-faceted extending beyond the individual to include social structures and the context in which health information is being accessed. Delivering health information via mobile devices (mHealth) expands the amount of information available while presenting challenges to ensuring these materials are suitable for a variety of literacy needs. The aims of this study are to discover how health literacy is addressed and evaluated in mHealth app development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review of 5 peer-reviewed databases was conducted. Eligible articles were written in English, addressed general literacy or mHealth/digital/eHealth literacy, and collected literacy information in order to incorporate literacy into the design and/or modification of an app or collected literacy information to describe the population being studied. The \"Health Literacy Online\" (HLO) United States (U.S.) government guide was used as a framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-two articles were reviewed. Articles included health literacy recommendations for all HLO categories and some recommendations not aligned with these categories. Most articles addressed health literacy using specific HLO categories though none incorporated every HLO category. The most common categories addressed engagement and testing of mHealth content. Though several studies addressed health literacy through a formal assessment tool, most did not. Evaluation of health literacy in mHealth was end-user focused and did not extensively evaluate content for fit to a variety of individuals with limited health literacy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The recommendations seen consistently in our results in conjunction with formal HLO categories can act as beginning steps towards development of a health literacy evaluation tool for mHealth apps themselves. It is clear efforts are being made to reduce barriers to using mHealth for those with literacy deficits, however, it was also clear that this space has room to be more pragmatic in evaluation of mHealth tools for literacy. End user engagement in design and testing is necessary in future mHealth literacy tool development.</p>","PeriodicalId":74181,"journal":{"name":"mHealth","volume":"8 ","pages":"33"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/0d/33/mh-08-22-11.PMC9634204.pdf","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Addressing and evaluating health literacy in mHealth: a scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Margaret R Emerson,&nbsp;Sydney Buckland,&nbsp;Maxwell A Lawlor,&nbsp;Danae Dinkel,&nbsp;David J Johnson,&nbsp;Maria S Mickles,&nbsp;Louis Fok,&nbsp;Shinobu Watanabe-Galloway\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/mhealth-22-11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent surveys have revealed many adults have basic or below basic health literacy, which is linked to medical errors, increased illness, and compromised public health. Health literacy as a concept is multi-faceted extending beyond the individual to include social structures and the context in which health information is being accessed. Delivering health information via mobile devices (mHealth) expands the amount of information available while presenting challenges to ensuring these materials are suitable for a variety of literacy needs. The aims of this study are to discover how health literacy is addressed and evaluated in mHealth app development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review of 5 peer-reviewed databases was conducted. Eligible articles were written in English, addressed general literacy or mHealth/digital/eHealth literacy, and collected literacy information in order to incorporate literacy into the design and/or modification of an app or collected literacy information to describe the population being studied. The \\\"Health Literacy Online\\\" (HLO) United States (U.S.) government guide was used as a framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-two articles were reviewed. Articles included health literacy recommendations for all HLO categories and some recommendations not aligned with these categories. Most articles addressed health literacy using specific HLO categories though none incorporated every HLO category. The most common categories addressed engagement and testing of mHealth content. Though several studies addressed health literacy through a formal assessment tool, most did not. Evaluation of health literacy in mHealth was end-user focused and did not extensively evaluate content for fit to a variety of individuals with limited health literacy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The recommendations seen consistently in our results in conjunction with formal HLO categories can act as beginning steps towards development of a health literacy evaluation tool for mHealth apps themselves. It is clear efforts are being made to reduce barriers to using mHealth for those with literacy deficits, however, it was also clear that this space has room to be more pragmatic in evaluation of mHealth tools for literacy. End user engagement in design and testing is necessary in future mHealth literacy tool development.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74181,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"mHealth\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"33\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/0d/33/mh-08-22-11.PMC9634204.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"mHealth\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/mhealth-22-11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"mHealth","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/mhealth-22-11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

背景:最近的调查显示,许多成年人具有基本或低于基本的卫生知识,这与医疗差错、疾病增加和公共卫生受损有关。卫生知识普及作为一个概念是多方面的,超出了个人范畴,还包括社会结构和获取卫生信息的背景。通过移动设备(mHealth)提供健康信息扩大了可用信息的数量,同时也提出了确保这些材料适合各种扫盲需求的挑战。本研究的目的是发现健康素养如何在移动健康应用程序开发中得到解决和评估。方法:对5个经同行评议的数据库进行范围综述。符合条件的文章用英语撰写,涉及一般素养或移动健康/数字/电子健康素养,并收集素养信息,以便将素养纳入应用程序的设计和/或修改中,或收集素养信息以描述所研究的人群。“在线健康素养”(HLO)美国政府指南被用作一个框架。结果:共回顾32篇文献。文章包括卫生组织所有类别的卫生扫盲建议以及与这些类别不一致的一些建议。大多数文章使用特定的卫生组织类别来讨论卫生素养问题,但没有一篇文章将卫生组织的每个类别都纳入其中。最常见的类别涉及移动医疗内容的参与和测试。虽然有几项研究通过正式的评估工具解决了卫生素养问题,但大多数研究都没有这样做。对移动医疗健康素养的评估以终端用户为中心,没有广泛评估内容是否适合健康素养有限的各种个人。结论:在我们的研究结果中看到的建议与正式的HLO分类相结合,可以作为开发移动健康应用程序本身的健康素养评估工具的第一步。很明显,正在努力减少文盲使用移动医疗的障碍,然而,也很明显,在评估用于扫盲的移动医疗工具方面,这一领域还有更务实的空间。终端用户参与设计和测试是未来移动健康素养工具开发的必要条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Addressing and evaluating health literacy in mHealth: a scoping review.

Addressing and evaluating health literacy in mHealth: a scoping review.

Background: Recent surveys have revealed many adults have basic or below basic health literacy, which is linked to medical errors, increased illness, and compromised public health. Health literacy as a concept is multi-faceted extending beyond the individual to include social structures and the context in which health information is being accessed. Delivering health information via mobile devices (mHealth) expands the amount of information available while presenting challenges to ensuring these materials are suitable for a variety of literacy needs. The aims of this study are to discover how health literacy is addressed and evaluated in mHealth app development.

Methods: A scoping review of 5 peer-reviewed databases was conducted. Eligible articles were written in English, addressed general literacy or mHealth/digital/eHealth literacy, and collected literacy information in order to incorporate literacy into the design and/or modification of an app or collected literacy information to describe the population being studied. The "Health Literacy Online" (HLO) United States (U.S.) government guide was used as a framework.

Results: Thirty-two articles were reviewed. Articles included health literacy recommendations for all HLO categories and some recommendations not aligned with these categories. Most articles addressed health literacy using specific HLO categories though none incorporated every HLO category. The most common categories addressed engagement and testing of mHealth content. Though several studies addressed health literacy through a formal assessment tool, most did not. Evaluation of health literacy in mHealth was end-user focused and did not extensively evaluate content for fit to a variety of individuals with limited health literacy.

Conclusions: The recommendations seen consistently in our results in conjunction with formal HLO categories can act as beginning steps towards development of a health literacy evaluation tool for mHealth apps themselves. It is clear efforts are being made to reduce barriers to using mHealth for those with literacy deficits, however, it was also clear that this space has room to be more pragmatic in evaluation of mHealth tools for literacy. End user engagement in design and testing is necessary in future mHealth literacy tool development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信