Haley C Dresang, Denise Y Harvey, Sharon X Xie, Priyanka P Shah-Basak, Laura DeLoretta, Rachel Wurzman, Shreya Y Parchure, Daniela Sacchetti, Olufunsho Faseyitan, Falk W Lohoff, Roy H Hamilton
{"title":"神经可塑性的遗传和神经生理生物标志物为中风后语言恢复提供信息。","authors":"Haley C Dresang, Denise Y Harvey, Sharon X Xie, Priyanka P Shah-Basak, Laura DeLoretta, Rachel Wurzman, Shreya Y Parchure, Daniela Sacchetti, Olufunsho Faseyitan, Falk W Lohoff, Roy H Hamilton","doi":"10.1177/15459683221096391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is high variability in post-stroke aphasia severity and predicting recovery remains imprecise. Standard prognostics do not include neurophysiological indicators or genetic biomarkers of neuroplasticity, which may be critical sources of variability.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate whether a common polymorphism (Val<sup>66</sup>Met) in the gene for brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) contributes to variability in post-stroke aphasia, and to assess whether BDNF polymorphism interacts with neurophysiological indicators of neuroplasticity (cortical excitability and stimulation-induced neuroplasticity) to improve estimates of aphasia severity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Saliva samples and motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) were collected from participants with chronic aphasia subsequent to left-hemisphere stroke. MEPs were collected prior to continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS; index for cortical excitability) and 10 minutes following cTBS (index for stimulation-induced neuroplasticity) to the right primary motor cortex. Analyses assessed the extent to which BDNF polymorphism interacted with cortical excitability and stimulation-induced neuroplasticity to predict aphasia severity beyond established predictors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Val<sup>66</sup>Val carriers showed less aphasia severity than Val<sup>66</sup>Met carriers, after controlling for lesion volume and time post-stroke. Furthermore, Val<sup>66</sup>Val carriers showed expected effects of age on aphasia severity, and positive associations between severity and both cortical excitability and stimulation-induced neuroplasticity. In contrast, Val<sup>66</sup>Met carriers showed weaker effects of age and negative associations between cortical excitability, stimulation-induced neuroplasticity and aphasia severity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Neurophysiological indicators and genetic biomarkers of neuroplasticity improved aphasia severity predictions. Furthermore, BDNF polymorphism interacted with cortical excitability and stimulation-induced neuroplasticity to improve predictions. These findings provide novel insights into mechanisms of variability in stroke recovery and may improve aphasia prognostics.</p>","PeriodicalId":56104,"journal":{"name":"Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair","volume":"36 6","pages":"371-380"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9133188/pdf/nihms-1797167.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Genetic and Neurophysiological Biomarkers of Neuroplasticity Inform Post-Stroke Language Recovery.\",\"authors\":\"Haley C Dresang, Denise Y Harvey, Sharon X Xie, Priyanka P Shah-Basak, Laura DeLoretta, Rachel Wurzman, Shreya Y Parchure, Daniela Sacchetti, Olufunsho Faseyitan, Falk W Lohoff, Roy H Hamilton\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15459683221096391\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is high variability in post-stroke aphasia severity and predicting recovery remains imprecise. Standard prognostics do not include neurophysiological indicators or genetic biomarkers of neuroplasticity, which may be critical sources of variability.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate whether a common polymorphism (Val<sup>66</sup>Met) in the gene for brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) contributes to variability in post-stroke aphasia, and to assess whether BDNF polymorphism interacts with neurophysiological indicators of neuroplasticity (cortical excitability and stimulation-induced neuroplasticity) to improve estimates of aphasia severity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Saliva samples and motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) were collected from participants with chronic aphasia subsequent to left-hemisphere stroke. MEPs were collected prior to continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS; index for cortical excitability) and 10 minutes following cTBS (index for stimulation-induced neuroplasticity) to the right primary motor cortex. Analyses assessed the extent to which BDNF polymorphism interacted with cortical excitability and stimulation-induced neuroplasticity to predict aphasia severity beyond established predictors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Val<sup>66</sup>Val carriers showed less aphasia severity than Val<sup>66</sup>Met carriers, after controlling for lesion volume and time post-stroke. Furthermore, Val<sup>66</sup>Val carriers showed expected effects of age on aphasia severity, and positive associations between severity and both cortical excitability and stimulation-induced neuroplasticity. In contrast, Val<sup>66</sup>Met carriers showed weaker effects of age and negative associations between cortical excitability, stimulation-induced neuroplasticity and aphasia severity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Neurophysiological indicators and genetic biomarkers of neuroplasticity improved aphasia severity predictions. Furthermore, BDNF polymorphism interacted with cortical excitability and stimulation-induced neuroplasticity to improve predictions. These findings provide novel insights into mechanisms of variability in stroke recovery and may improve aphasia prognostics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56104,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair\",\"volume\":\"36 6\",\"pages\":\"371-380\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9133188/pdf/nihms-1797167.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15459683221096391\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15459683221096391","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Genetic and Neurophysiological Biomarkers of Neuroplasticity Inform Post-Stroke Language Recovery.
Background: There is high variability in post-stroke aphasia severity and predicting recovery remains imprecise. Standard prognostics do not include neurophysiological indicators or genetic biomarkers of neuroplasticity, which may be critical sources of variability.
Objective: To evaluate whether a common polymorphism (Val66Met) in the gene for brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) contributes to variability in post-stroke aphasia, and to assess whether BDNF polymorphism interacts with neurophysiological indicators of neuroplasticity (cortical excitability and stimulation-induced neuroplasticity) to improve estimates of aphasia severity.
Methods: Saliva samples and motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) were collected from participants with chronic aphasia subsequent to left-hemisphere stroke. MEPs were collected prior to continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS; index for cortical excitability) and 10 minutes following cTBS (index for stimulation-induced neuroplasticity) to the right primary motor cortex. Analyses assessed the extent to which BDNF polymorphism interacted with cortical excitability and stimulation-induced neuroplasticity to predict aphasia severity beyond established predictors.
Results: Val66Val carriers showed less aphasia severity than Val66Met carriers, after controlling for lesion volume and time post-stroke. Furthermore, Val66Val carriers showed expected effects of age on aphasia severity, and positive associations between severity and both cortical excitability and stimulation-induced neuroplasticity. In contrast, Val66Met carriers showed weaker effects of age and negative associations between cortical excitability, stimulation-induced neuroplasticity and aphasia severity.
Conclusions: Neurophysiological indicators and genetic biomarkers of neuroplasticity improved aphasia severity predictions. Furthermore, BDNF polymorphism interacted with cortical excitability and stimulation-induced neuroplasticity to improve predictions. These findings provide novel insights into mechanisms of variability in stroke recovery and may improve aphasia prognostics.
期刊介绍:
Neurorehabilitation & Neural Repair (NNR) offers innovative and reliable reports relevant to functional recovery from neural injury and long term neurologic care. The journal''s unique focus is evidence-based basic and clinical practice and research. NNR deals with the management and fundamental mechanisms of functional recovery from conditions such as stroke, multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer''s disease, brain and spinal cord injuries, and peripheral nerve injuries.