神经可塑性的遗传和神经生理生物标志物为中风后语言恢复提供信息。

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Haley C Dresang, Denise Y Harvey, Sharon X Xie, Priyanka P Shah-Basak, Laura DeLoretta, Rachel Wurzman, Shreya Y Parchure, Daniela Sacchetti, Olufunsho Faseyitan, Falk W Lohoff, Roy H Hamilton
{"title":"神经可塑性的遗传和神经生理生物标志物为中风后语言恢复提供信息。","authors":"Haley C Dresang,&nbsp;Denise Y Harvey,&nbsp;Sharon X Xie,&nbsp;Priyanka P Shah-Basak,&nbsp;Laura DeLoretta,&nbsp;Rachel Wurzman,&nbsp;Shreya Y Parchure,&nbsp;Daniela Sacchetti,&nbsp;Olufunsho Faseyitan,&nbsp;Falk W Lohoff,&nbsp;Roy H Hamilton","doi":"10.1177/15459683221096391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is high variability in post-stroke aphasia severity and predicting recovery remains imprecise. Standard prognostics do not include neurophysiological indicators or genetic biomarkers of neuroplasticity, which may be critical sources of variability.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate whether a common polymorphism (Val<sup>66</sup>Met) in the gene for brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) contributes to variability in post-stroke aphasia, and to assess whether BDNF polymorphism interacts with neurophysiological indicators of neuroplasticity (cortical excitability and stimulation-induced neuroplasticity) to improve estimates of aphasia severity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Saliva samples and motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) were collected from participants with chronic aphasia subsequent to left-hemisphere stroke. MEPs were collected prior to continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS; index for cortical excitability) and 10 minutes following cTBS (index for stimulation-induced neuroplasticity) to the right primary motor cortex. Analyses assessed the extent to which BDNF polymorphism interacted with cortical excitability and stimulation-induced neuroplasticity to predict aphasia severity beyond established predictors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Val<sup>66</sup>Val carriers showed less aphasia severity than Val<sup>66</sup>Met carriers, after controlling for lesion volume and time post-stroke. Furthermore, Val<sup>66</sup>Val carriers showed expected effects of age on aphasia severity, and positive associations between severity and both cortical excitability and stimulation-induced neuroplasticity. In contrast, Val<sup>66</sup>Met carriers showed weaker effects of age and negative associations between cortical excitability, stimulation-induced neuroplasticity and aphasia severity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Neurophysiological indicators and genetic biomarkers of neuroplasticity improved aphasia severity predictions. Furthermore, BDNF polymorphism interacted with cortical excitability and stimulation-induced neuroplasticity to improve predictions. These findings provide novel insights into mechanisms of variability in stroke recovery and may improve aphasia prognostics.</p>","PeriodicalId":56104,"journal":{"name":"Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair","volume":"36 6","pages":"371-380"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9133188/pdf/nihms-1797167.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Genetic and Neurophysiological Biomarkers of Neuroplasticity Inform Post-Stroke Language Recovery.\",\"authors\":\"Haley C Dresang,&nbsp;Denise Y Harvey,&nbsp;Sharon X Xie,&nbsp;Priyanka P Shah-Basak,&nbsp;Laura DeLoretta,&nbsp;Rachel Wurzman,&nbsp;Shreya Y Parchure,&nbsp;Daniela Sacchetti,&nbsp;Olufunsho Faseyitan,&nbsp;Falk W Lohoff,&nbsp;Roy H Hamilton\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15459683221096391\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is high variability in post-stroke aphasia severity and predicting recovery remains imprecise. Standard prognostics do not include neurophysiological indicators or genetic biomarkers of neuroplasticity, which may be critical sources of variability.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate whether a common polymorphism (Val<sup>66</sup>Met) in the gene for brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) contributes to variability in post-stroke aphasia, and to assess whether BDNF polymorphism interacts with neurophysiological indicators of neuroplasticity (cortical excitability and stimulation-induced neuroplasticity) to improve estimates of aphasia severity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Saliva samples and motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) were collected from participants with chronic aphasia subsequent to left-hemisphere stroke. MEPs were collected prior to continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS; index for cortical excitability) and 10 minutes following cTBS (index for stimulation-induced neuroplasticity) to the right primary motor cortex. Analyses assessed the extent to which BDNF polymorphism interacted with cortical excitability and stimulation-induced neuroplasticity to predict aphasia severity beyond established predictors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Val<sup>66</sup>Val carriers showed less aphasia severity than Val<sup>66</sup>Met carriers, after controlling for lesion volume and time post-stroke. Furthermore, Val<sup>66</sup>Val carriers showed expected effects of age on aphasia severity, and positive associations between severity and both cortical excitability and stimulation-induced neuroplasticity. In contrast, Val<sup>66</sup>Met carriers showed weaker effects of age and negative associations between cortical excitability, stimulation-induced neuroplasticity and aphasia severity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Neurophysiological indicators and genetic biomarkers of neuroplasticity improved aphasia severity predictions. Furthermore, BDNF polymorphism interacted with cortical excitability and stimulation-induced neuroplasticity to improve predictions. These findings provide novel insights into mechanisms of variability in stroke recovery and may improve aphasia prognostics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56104,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair\",\"volume\":\"36 6\",\"pages\":\"371-380\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9133188/pdf/nihms-1797167.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15459683221096391\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15459683221096391","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:脑卒中后失语症的严重程度有很大的可变性,预测恢复仍然不精确。标准预后不包括神经生理学指标或神经可塑性的遗传生物标志物,这可能是变异性的关键来源。目的:评估脑源性神经营养因子(BDNF)基因的共同多态性(Val66Met)是否有助于脑卒中后失语的变异性,并评估BDNF多态性是否与神经可塑性的神经生理指标(皮质兴奋性和刺激诱导的神经可塑性)相互作用,以提高失语严重程度的估计。方法:采集左脑卒中后慢性失语症患者的唾液和运动诱发电位(MEPs)。在连续脉冲刺激(cTBS)之前收集mep;皮层兴奋性指数)和cTBS后10分钟(刺激诱导神经可塑性指数)到右侧初级运动皮层。分析评估了BDNF多态性与皮质兴奋性和刺激诱导的神经可塑性相互作用的程度,以预测失语症的严重程度。结果:在控制脑卒中后病变体积和时间后,Val66Val携带者的失语严重程度低于Val66Met携带者。此外,Val66Val携带者表现出预期的年龄对失语症严重程度的影响,失语症严重程度与皮质兴奋性和刺激诱导的神经可塑性呈正相关。相比之下,Val66Met携带者的年龄影响较弱,皮质兴奋性、刺激诱导的神经可塑性和失语严重程度之间呈负相关。结论:神经生理学指标和神经可塑性遗传生物标志物可改善失语严重程度的预测。此外,BDNF多态性与皮质兴奋性和刺激诱导的神经可塑性相互作用,以提高预测。这些发现为卒中恢复变异性的机制提供了新的见解,并可能改善失语症的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Genetic and Neurophysiological Biomarkers of Neuroplasticity Inform Post-Stroke Language Recovery.

Genetic and Neurophysiological Biomarkers of Neuroplasticity Inform Post-Stroke Language Recovery.

Genetic and Neurophysiological Biomarkers of Neuroplasticity Inform Post-Stroke Language Recovery.

Background: There is high variability in post-stroke aphasia severity and predicting recovery remains imprecise. Standard prognostics do not include neurophysiological indicators or genetic biomarkers of neuroplasticity, which may be critical sources of variability.

Objective: To evaluate whether a common polymorphism (Val66Met) in the gene for brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) contributes to variability in post-stroke aphasia, and to assess whether BDNF polymorphism interacts with neurophysiological indicators of neuroplasticity (cortical excitability and stimulation-induced neuroplasticity) to improve estimates of aphasia severity.

Methods: Saliva samples and motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) were collected from participants with chronic aphasia subsequent to left-hemisphere stroke. MEPs were collected prior to continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS; index for cortical excitability) and 10 minutes following cTBS (index for stimulation-induced neuroplasticity) to the right primary motor cortex. Analyses assessed the extent to which BDNF polymorphism interacted with cortical excitability and stimulation-induced neuroplasticity to predict aphasia severity beyond established predictors.

Results: Val66Val carriers showed less aphasia severity than Val66Met carriers, after controlling for lesion volume and time post-stroke. Furthermore, Val66Val carriers showed expected effects of age on aphasia severity, and positive associations between severity and both cortical excitability and stimulation-induced neuroplasticity. In contrast, Val66Met carriers showed weaker effects of age and negative associations between cortical excitability, stimulation-induced neuroplasticity and aphasia severity.

Conclusions: Neurophysiological indicators and genetic biomarkers of neuroplasticity improved aphasia severity predictions. Furthermore, BDNF polymorphism interacted with cortical excitability and stimulation-induced neuroplasticity to improve predictions. These findings provide novel insights into mechanisms of variability in stroke recovery and may improve aphasia prognostics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
52
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurorehabilitation & Neural Repair (NNR) offers innovative and reliable reports relevant to functional recovery from neural injury and long term neurologic care. The journal''s unique focus is evidence-based basic and clinical practice and research. NNR deals with the management and fundamental mechanisms of functional recovery from conditions such as stroke, multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer''s disease, brain and spinal cord injuries, and peripheral nerve injuries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信