Timm Rosburg, Regine Lohss, Monica S Bachmann, Brigitte Walter Meyer, Wout de Boer, Katrin Fischer, Regina Kunz
{"title":"[医疗评估质量评估中被保险人视角的整合]。","authors":"Timm Rosburg, Regine Lohss, Monica S Bachmann, Brigitte Walter Meyer, Wout de Boer, Katrin Fischer, Regina Kunz","doi":"10.1024/0040-5930/a001414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Integration of the Insured Person's Perspective in the Quality Assessment of Medical Evaluations <b>Abstract.</b> In the current practice of medical work disability evaluations and other pension assessments, insured persons in Switzerland lack the possibility to routinely provide feedback on the extent to which they felt treated with dignity and respect by medical experts, which, according to occasional complaints, does not always seem to be the case. In order to be able to systematically capture such aspects of interactive fairness, we developed a questionnaire, the Basel Fairness Questionnaire (BFQ). The BFQ contains 30 statements such as «The reviewer listened to me.», which the insured person can agree to on four levels (from «I do not agree at all.» to «I fully agree.»). For validating the questionnaire, 305 claimants for disability pensions completed the BFQ after their medical work disability evaluation. A factor analysis conducted on the answered questions confirmed our assumption that the BFQ questions covered the areas of 1) <i>respect and trust</i>, 2) <i>participation</i>, 3) <i>case familiarity of the expert</i>, and 4) <i>transparency of the evaluation process</i>. Furthermore, our study demonstrated divergent and convergent validity of the BFQ with other questionnaire instruments. The BFF opens up the possibility to capture the abstract concept of fairness by means of assessments of concrete expert behavior. We expect that the questionnaire can thus contribute to quality assurance in this sensitive area.</p>","PeriodicalId":44874,"journal":{"name":"THERAPEUTISCHE UMSCHAU","volume":"80 2","pages":"78-84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Integration of the Insured Person's Perspective in the Quality Assessment of Medical Evaluations].\",\"authors\":\"Timm Rosburg, Regine Lohss, Monica S Bachmann, Brigitte Walter Meyer, Wout de Boer, Katrin Fischer, Regina Kunz\",\"doi\":\"10.1024/0040-5930/a001414\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Integration of the Insured Person's Perspective in the Quality Assessment of Medical Evaluations <b>Abstract.</b> In the current practice of medical work disability evaluations and other pension assessments, insured persons in Switzerland lack the possibility to routinely provide feedback on the extent to which they felt treated with dignity and respect by medical experts, which, according to occasional complaints, does not always seem to be the case. In order to be able to systematically capture such aspects of interactive fairness, we developed a questionnaire, the Basel Fairness Questionnaire (BFQ). The BFQ contains 30 statements such as «The reviewer listened to me.», which the insured person can agree to on four levels (from «I do not agree at all.» to «I fully agree.»). For validating the questionnaire, 305 claimants for disability pensions completed the BFQ after their medical work disability evaluation. A factor analysis conducted on the answered questions confirmed our assumption that the BFQ questions covered the areas of 1) <i>respect and trust</i>, 2) <i>participation</i>, 3) <i>case familiarity of the expert</i>, and 4) <i>transparency of the evaluation process</i>. Furthermore, our study demonstrated divergent and convergent validity of the BFQ with other questionnaire instruments. The BFF opens up the possibility to capture the abstract concept of fairness by means of assessments of concrete expert behavior. We expect that the questionnaire can thus contribute to quality assurance in this sensitive area.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44874,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"THERAPEUTISCHE UMSCHAU\",\"volume\":\"80 2\",\"pages\":\"78-84\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"THERAPEUTISCHE UMSCHAU\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1024/0040-5930/a001414\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"THERAPEUTISCHE UMSCHAU","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1024/0040-5930/a001414","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
[Integration of the Insured Person's Perspective in the Quality Assessment of Medical Evaluations].
Integration of the Insured Person's Perspective in the Quality Assessment of Medical Evaluations Abstract. In the current practice of medical work disability evaluations and other pension assessments, insured persons in Switzerland lack the possibility to routinely provide feedback on the extent to which they felt treated with dignity and respect by medical experts, which, according to occasional complaints, does not always seem to be the case. In order to be able to systematically capture such aspects of interactive fairness, we developed a questionnaire, the Basel Fairness Questionnaire (BFQ). The BFQ contains 30 statements such as «The reviewer listened to me.», which the insured person can agree to on four levels (from «I do not agree at all.» to «I fully agree.»). For validating the questionnaire, 305 claimants for disability pensions completed the BFQ after their medical work disability evaluation. A factor analysis conducted on the answered questions confirmed our assumption that the BFQ questions covered the areas of 1) respect and trust, 2) participation, 3) case familiarity of the expert, and 4) transparency of the evaluation process. Furthermore, our study demonstrated divergent and convergent validity of the BFQ with other questionnaire instruments. The BFF opens up the possibility to capture the abstract concept of fairness by means of assessments of concrete expert behavior. We expect that the questionnaire can thus contribute to quality assurance in this sensitive area.