南非豪登省一家私立医院成年患者棘白菌素的处方模式。

IF 1.4 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Anja Grey, Rianda Joubert, Stephan Steyn, Marlene Julyan
{"title":"南非豪登省一家私立医院成年患者棘白菌素的处方模式。","authors":"Anja Grey,&nbsp;Rianda Joubert,&nbsp;Stephan Steyn,&nbsp;Marlene Julyan","doi":"10.4102/sajid.v38i1.470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Worldwide, the leading cause of invasive candidiasis and the fourth leading cause of hospital-acquired infections are the Candida species (spp.) group. One of the most important tools in fighting such drug-resistant fungi is the appropriate use of antifungal agents.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The study aimed to determine echinocandins' general prescribing patterns and how they are associated with the treatment period.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A quantitative, observational, and descriptive was used, and included patients receiving antifungal treatment in a private hospital in Gauteng, South Africa between 01 January 2015 to 31 December 2015.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 146 patient files included, 102 patients (69.9%) received caspofungin and 44 patients (30.1%) were treated with anidulafungin. For the former, 99 (97.1%) patients received a loading dose (LD) of 70 mg, while 200 mg anidulafungin was only prescribed to 30 patients (68.2%). In line with maintenance dose guidelines, the majority (98.1%) of caspofungin-treated patients received 50 mg IV daily, whereas 4 (3.9%) patients were treated at higher doses (70 mg daily). Anidulafungin was administered at various maintenance doses, including 400 mg (2.3% of patients), 200 mg (52.3%), 100 mg (43.2%) and 50 mg (2.3%) IV daily.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results can be utilised to produce a hospital-specific algorithm in terms of Candida-infected patients.</p><p><strong>Contribution: </strong>These findings contribute to our understanding of prescribing patterns of antifungal agents and the impact thereof on treating <i>Candida</i> spp. Infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":44007,"journal":{"name":"Southern African Journal of Infectious Diseases","volume":"38 1","pages":"470"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10091186/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prescribing patterns of echinocandins in adult patients in a private hospital in Gauteng, South Africa.\",\"authors\":\"Anja Grey,&nbsp;Rianda Joubert,&nbsp;Stephan Steyn,&nbsp;Marlene Julyan\",\"doi\":\"10.4102/sajid.v38i1.470\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Worldwide, the leading cause of invasive candidiasis and the fourth leading cause of hospital-acquired infections are the Candida species (spp.) group. One of the most important tools in fighting such drug-resistant fungi is the appropriate use of antifungal agents.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The study aimed to determine echinocandins' general prescribing patterns and how they are associated with the treatment period.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A quantitative, observational, and descriptive was used, and included patients receiving antifungal treatment in a private hospital in Gauteng, South Africa between 01 January 2015 to 31 December 2015.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 146 patient files included, 102 patients (69.9%) received caspofungin and 44 patients (30.1%) were treated with anidulafungin. For the former, 99 (97.1%) patients received a loading dose (LD) of 70 mg, while 200 mg anidulafungin was only prescribed to 30 patients (68.2%). In line with maintenance dose guidelines, the majority (98.1%) of caspofungin-treated patients received 50 mg IV daily, whereas 4 (3.9%) patients were treated at higher doses (70 mg daily). Anidulafungin was administered at various maintenance doses, including 400 mg (2.3% of patients), 200 mg (52.3%), 100 mg (43.2%) and 50 mg (2.3%) IV daily.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results can be utilised to produce a hospital-specific algorithm in terms of Candida-infected patients.</p><p><strong>Contribution: </strong>These findings contribute to our understanding of prescribing patterns of antifungal agents and the impact thereof on treating <i>Candida</i> spp. Infections.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44007,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Southern African Journal of Infectious Diseases\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"470\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10091186/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Southern African Journal of Infectious Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajid.v38i1.470\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern African Journal of Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajid.v38i1.470","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在世界范围内,侵袭性念珠菌病的主要原因和医院获得性感染的第四大原因是念珠菌种(种)组。对抗此类耐药真菌的最重要工具之一是适当使用抗真菌剂。目的:本研究旨在确定棘白菌素的一般处方模式及其与治疗期的关系。方法:采用定量、观察和描述性方法,纳入2015年1月1日至2015年12月31日在南非豪登省一家私立医院接受抗真菌治疗的患者。结果:纳入的146例患者中,102例(69.9%)患者接受了卡泊芬净治疗,44例(30.1%)患者接受了阿尼杜芬净治疗。对于前者,99例(97.1%)患者的负荷剂量(LD)为70 mg,而anidulafungin的负荷剂量(LD)仅为30例(68.2%)。根据维持剂量指南,大多数(98.1%)接受caspofungin治疗的患者每天接受50mg静脉注射,而4名(3.9%)患者接受更高剂量(每天70mg)治疗。Anidulafungin以不同的维持剂量给予,包括每日400mg(2.3%的患者)、200mg(52.3%)、100mg(43.2%)和50mg(2.3%)静脉注射。结论:我们的结果可用于生产医院特异性算法在念珠菌感染的病人。贡献:这些发现有助于我们理解抗真菌药物的处方模式及其对治疗念珠菌感染的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prescribing patterns of echinocandins in adult patients in a private hospital in Gauteng, South Africa.

Background: Worldwide, the leading cause of invasive candidiasis and the fourth leading cause of hospital-acquired infections are the Candida species (spp.) group. One of the most important tools in fighting such drug-resistant fungi is the appropriate use of antifungal agents.

Objectives: The study aimed to determine echinocandins' general prescribing patterns and how they are associated with the treatment period.

Method: A quantitative, observational, and descriptive was used, and included patients receiving antifungal treatment in a private hospital in Gauteng, South Africa between 01 January 2015 to 31 December 2015.

Results: Of the 146 patient files included, 102 patients (69.9%) received caspofungin and 44 patients (30.1%) were treated with anidulafungin. For the former, 99 (97.1%) patients received a loading dose (LD) of 70 mg, while 200 mg anidulafungin was only prescribed to 30 patients (68.2%). In line with maintenance dose guidelines, the majority (98.1%) of caspofungin-treated patients received 50 mg IV daily, whereas 4 (3.9%) patients were treated at higher doses (70 mg daily). Anidulafungin was administered at various maintenance doses, including 400 mg (2.3% of patients), 200 mg (52.3%), 100 mg (43.2%) and 50 mg (2.3%) IV daily.

Conclusion: Our results can be utilised to produce a hospital-specific algorithm in terms of Candida-infected patients.

Contribution: These findings contribute to our understanding of prescribing patterns of antifungal agents and the impact thereof on treating Candida spp. Infections.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
11.10%
发文量
50
审稿时长
52 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信