评估不同稀释模式对无抗凝剂连续静脉血液透析过程中回路寿命的影响。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Seminars in Dialysis Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-02-20 DOI:10.1111/sdi.13147
Fang Wang, Min Zhang, Xu Li, Xiankun Sun, Xuanchen He, Mingjing Guan, Zhiwen Chen, Li Lin, Xue Tang, Ling Zhang
{"title":"评估不同稀释模式对无抗凝剂连续静脉血液透析过程中回路寿命的影响。","authors":"Fang Wang, Min Zhang, Xu Li, Xiankun Sun, Xuanchen He, Mingjing Guan, Zhiwen Chen, Li Lin, Xue Tang, Ling Zhang","doi":"10.1111/sdi.13147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Circuit clotting remains a major problem during continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT), particularly in patients with contraindications to anticoagulant use. We hypothesized that the different options of alternative replacement fluid infusion sites might affect circuit lifespan. However, research-based evidence supporting an optimal replacement fluid infusion strategy is limited. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the effect of three dilution modes (pre-dilution, post-dilution, and pre- to post-dilution) on circuit lifespan during continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective cohort study was conducted between December 2019 and December 2020. Patients requiring CKRT were enrolled to receive pre-dilution, post-dilution, or pre- to post-dilution fluid infusion with CVVHDF. The primary endpoint was circuit lifespan, and the secondary outcomes included the clinical parameters of patients, such as changes in serum creatinine (Scr) and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) levels, 28-day all-cause mortality, and length of stay. For all patients included in this study, only the first circuit used was recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 132 patients enrolled in this study, 40 were in the pre-dilution mode, 42 were in the post-dilution mode, and 50 were in the pre- to post-dilution mode. The mean circuit lifespan was significantly longer in the pre- to post-dilution group (45.72 h, 95% CI, 39.75-51.69 h) than in the pre-dilution group (31.58 h, 95% CI, 26.33-36.82 h) and the post-dilution group (35.20 h, 95% CI, 29.62-40.78 h). There was no significant difference between the pre- and post-dilution group circuit lifespan (p > 0.05). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed a significant difference between the three dilution modes (p = 0.001). No significant differences were observed in terms of changes in the Scr and BUN levels, admission day, and 28-day all-cause mortality among the three dilution groups (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The pre- to post-dilution mode significantly prolonged circuit lifespan but did not reduce Scr and BUN levels, compared with the pre-dilution and post-dilution modes during CVVHDF when no anticoagulants were used.</p>","PeriodicalId":21675,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Dialysis","volume":" ","pages":"52-58"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An evaluation of different dilution modes on circuit lifespan during continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration without anticoagulation.\",\"authors\":\"Fang Wang, Min Zhang, Xu Li, Xiankun Sun, Xuanchen He, Mingjing Guan, Zhiwen Chen, Li Lin, Xue Tang, Ling Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/sdi.13147\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Circuit clotting remains a major problem during continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT), particularly in patients with contraindications to anticoagulant use. We hypothesized that the different options of alternative replacement fluid infusion sites might affect circuit lifespan. However, research-based evidence supporting an optimal replacement fluid infusion strategy is limited. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the effect of three dilution modes (pre-dilution, post-dilution, and pre- to post-dilution) on circuit lifespan during continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective cohort study was conducted between December 2019 and December 2020. Patients requiring CKRT were enrolled to receive pre-dilution, post-dilution, or pre- to post-dilution fluid infusion with CVVHDF. The primary endpoint was circuit lifespan, and the secondary outcomes included the clinical parameters of patients, such as changes in serum creatinine (Scr) and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) levels, 28-day all-cause mortality, and length of stay. For all patients included in this study, only the first circuit used was recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 132 patients enrolled in this study, 40 were in the pre-dilution mode, 42 were in the post-dilution mode, and 50 were in the pre- to post-dilution mode. The mean circuit lifespan was significantly longer in the pre- to post-dilution group (45.72 h, 95% CI, 39.75-51.69 h) than in the pre-dilution group (31.58 h, 95% CI, 26.33-36.82 h) and the post-dilution group (35.20 h, 95% CI, 29.62-40.78 h). There was no significant difference between the pre- and post-dilution group circuit lifespan (p > 0.05). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed a significant difference between the three dilution modes (p = 0.001). No significant differences were observed in terms of changes in the Scr and BUN levels, admission day, and 28-day all-cause mortality among the three dilution groups (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The pre- to post-dilution mode significantly prolonged circuit lifespan but did not reduce Scr and BUN levels, compared with the pre-dilution and post-dilution modes during CVVHDF when no anticoagulants were used.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21675,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in Dialysis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"52-58\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in Dialysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/sdi.13147\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/2/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Dialysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sdi.13147","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在连续性肾脏替代治疗(CKRT)期间,回路凝血仍是一个主要问题,尤其是对有抗凝剂使用禁忌症的患者而言。我们假设,替代替代液输注部位的不同选择可能会影响回路寿命。然而,支持最佳置换液输注策略的研究证据非常有限。因此,我们旨在评估三种稀释模式(稀释前、稀释后和稀释前至稀释后)对连续静脉-静脉血液透析(CVVHDF)过程中回路寿命的影响:这项前瞻性队列研究在 2019 年 12 月至 2020 年 12 月期间进行。需要接受 CKRT 的患者入组接受稀释前、稀释后或稀释前至稀释后的 CVVHDF 输液。主要终点是回路寿命,次要结果包括患者的临床参数,如血清肌酐(Scr)和血尿素氮(BUN)水平的变化、28 天全因死亡率和住院时间。对于所有纳入本研究的患者,只记录其使用的第一个回路:结果:在 132 名参与研究的患者中,40 人采用了前稀释模式,42 人采用了后稀释模式,50 人采用了前至后稀释模式。稀释前至稀释后组的平均回路寿命(45.72 小时,95% CI,39.75-51.69 小时)明显长于稀释前组(31.58 小时,95% CI,26.33-36.82 小时)和稀释后组(35.20 小时,95% CI,29.62-40.78 小时)。稀释前和稀释后组电路寿命无明显差异(P > 0.05)。卡普兰-米尔生存分析显示,三种稀释模式之间存在显著差异(p = 0.001)。三种稀释组的 Scr 和 BUN 水平变化、入院日和 28 天全因死亡率均无明显差异(P > 0.05):结论:在不使用抗凝剂的情况下,与CVVHDF期间的前稀释和后稀释模式相比,前稀释到后稀释模式明显延长了回路寿命,但并未降低Scr和BUN水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An evaluation of different dilution modes on circuit lifespan during continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration without anticoagulation.

Background: Circuit clotting remains a major problem during continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT), particularly in patients with contraindications to anticoagulant use. We hypothesized that the different options of alternative replacement fluid infusion sites might affect circuit lifespan. However, research-based evidence supporting an optimal replacement fluid infusion strategy is limited. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the effect of three dilution modes (pre-dilution, post-dilution, and pre- to post-dilution) on circuit lifespan during continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF).

Methods: This prospective cohort study was conducted between December 2019 and December 2020. Patients requiring CKRT were enrolled to receive pre-dilution, post-dilution, or pre- to post-dilution fluid infusion with CVVHDF. The primary endpoint was circuit lifespan, and the secondary outcomes included the clinical parameters of patients, such as changes in serum creatinine (Scr) and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) levels, 28-day all-cause mortality, and length of stay. For all patients included in this study, only the first circuit used was recorded.

Results: Among the 132 patients enrolled in this study, 40 were in the pre-dilution mode, 42 were in the post-dilution mode, and 50 were in the pre- to post-dilution mode. The mean circuit lifespan was significantly longer in the pre- to post-dilution group (45.72 h, 95% CI, 39.75-51.69 h) than in the pre-dilution group (31.58 h, 95% CI, 26.33-36.82 h) and the post-dilution group (35.20 h, 95% CI, 29.62-40.78 h). There was no significant difference between the pre- and post-dilution group circuit lifespan (p > 0.05). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed a significant difference between the three dilution modes (p = 0.001). No significant differences were observed in terms of changes in the Scr and BUN levels, admission day, and 28-day all-cause mortality among the three dilution groups (p > 0.05).

Conclusion: The pre- to post-dilution mode significantly prolonged circuit lifespan but did not reduce Scr and BUN levels, compared with the pre-dilution and post-dilution modes during CVVHDF when no anticoagulants were used.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Seminars in Dialysis
Seminars in Dialysis 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
91
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Seminars in Dialysis is a bimonthly publication focusing exclusively on cutting-edge clinical aspects of dialysis therapy. Besides publishing papers by the most respected names in the field of dialysis, the Journal has unique useful features, all designed to keep you current: -Fellows Forum -Dialysis rounds -Editorials -Opinions -Briefly noted -Summary and Comment -Guest Edited Issues -Special Articles Virtually everything you read in Seminars in Dialysis is written or solicited by the editors after choosing the most effective of nine different editorial styles and formats. They know that facts, speculations, ''how-to-do-it'' information, opinions, and news reports all play important roles in your education and the patient care you provide. Alternate issues of the journal are guest edited and focus on a single clinical topic in dialysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信