双切口技术治疗肱二头肌远端肌腱断裂。

IF 1 Q3 SURGERY
Michele Mercurio, Davide Castioni, Orlando Cosentino, Daniele Fanelli, Filippo Familiari, Giorgio Gasparini, Olimpio Galasso
{"title":"双切口技术治疗肱二头肌远端肌腱断裂。","authors":"Michele Mercurio,&nbsp;Davide Castioni,&nbsp;Orlando Cosentino,&nbsp;Daniele Fanelli,&nbsp;Filippo Familiari,&nbsp;Giorgio Gasparini,&nbsp;Olimpio Galasso","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.ST.21.00033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The double-incision technique with bone-tunnel fixation provides anatomical reattachment of a distal biceps tendon rupture to the radial tuberosity<sup>1</sup>. This technique has been described by Boyd and Anderson<sup>2</sup> and was later modified by Morrey et al.<sup>3</sup>. The aim of the procedure is to achieve good return of elbow strength and motion with a low rate of neurological complications.</p><p><strong>Description: </strong>A longitudinal antecubital incision of 3 to 4 cm allows dissection to identify and isolate the lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve (LABCN). Supination of the forearm protects the posterior interosseus nerve, which often cannot be visualized. The distal portion of the distal biceps should be carefully identified and exposed. A high-resistance nonresorbable suture is sewn with use of a Krackow technique to whipstitch the distal 4 cm of the tendon. Alternatively, 2 sutures (4 strands) can be utilized. A curved forceps is placed in the interosseous space to identify the location for the second 4-cm incision, on the dorsal proximal forearm over the tip of the forceps with the forearm pronated. The radial tuberosity is exposed by bluntly separating the common extensor tendons, followed by transection of the supinator fibers. Two drill holes are made 5 mm apart from one another for suture passage. The tendon is passed across a loop of wire, from the anterior to the posterior incision. With the elbow at 90° of flexion and full pronation, the tendon is docked into the trough and the sutures are tied.</p><p><strong>Alternatives: </strong>Alternatively, the surgical repair of the distal biceps tendon rupture can be performed through a single anterior approach<sup>4</sup>. The exposure starts with a curved longitudinal antecubital incision, exploiting the interval between the brachioradialis and pronator teres with radial (lateral) retraction of the brachioradialis and medial retraction of the pronator teres. A single anterior incision allows repair through the use of various types of fixation devices, such as suture anchors, cortical buttons, and interference screws, but seems to carry an increased risk of neurological complications, especially in terms of paresthesias in the distribution of the LABCN. Nonoperative treatment might be acceptable for elderly patients with poor functional demands.</p><p><strong>Rationale: </strong>The double-incision technique with bone-tunnel fixation provides good fixation strength with an expected low rate of neurological complications<sup>1</sup>. This approach offers a useful treatment option for young and active patients with physically demanding lifestyles.</p><p><strong>Expected outcomes: </strong>The double-incision technique is an effective and safe procedure to restore elbow functionality in patients with distal biceps tendon rupture. A meta-analysis<sup>1,4-16</sup> revealed no significant differences in postoperative functional scores following procedures performed via the single-incision compared with double-incision approach. Although the differences were smaller than the minimal clinically important difference<sup>17</sup>, the single-incision technique yielded significantly greater flexion (mean ± standard deviation, 136° ± 13°) and pronation range of motion (79° ± 10°) compared with the double-incision technique (133° ± 13° and 75° ± 14°, respectively) at 2 years postoperatively. No differences in extension and supination were observed. Rates of heterotopic ossification ranged from 0.5% to 11% for the single-incision approach and from 1% to 21.4% for the double-incision approach, with significant differences favoring the single-incision technique, although in the majority of cases the heterotopic ossification was an incidental finding. Neurological complications were found in 24.5% and 13.4% cases for the single- and double-incision techniques, respectively, with a significant difference favoring the double-incision technique. When damage to specific nerves was evaluated, the double-incision technique was associated with significantly less risk of LABCN damage.</p><p><strong>Important tips: </strong>One or 2 high-resistance nonresorbable sutures are sewn with use of a Krackow technique to whipstitch the distal 4 cm of the biceps tendon.A curved forceps is placed in the interosseous space to identify the location for the second incision, on the dorsal proximal forearm over the tip of the forceps.Pronation of the forearm protects the posterior interosseus nerve, which often cannot be visualized during volar dissection and bone fixation.Positioning the tendon more posteriorly on the radial tuberosity allows for optimal biomechanical function.</p><p><strong>Acronyms and abbreviations: </strong>ROM = range of motionCR = conventional radiologyMRI = magnetic resonance imagingUS = ultrasoundLABC = lateral antebrachial cutaneousPIN = posterior interosseous nerveHO = heterotopic ossificationCI = confidence intervalSI = single incisionDI = double incision.</p>","PeriodicalId":44676,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9931040/pdf/jxt-12-e21.00033.pdf","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Double-Incision Technique for the Treatment of Distal Biceps Tendon Rupture.\",\"authors\":\"Michele Mercurio,&nbsp;Davide Castioni,&nbsp;Orlando Cosentino,&nbsp;Daniele Fanelli,&nbsp;Filippo Familiari,&nbsp;Giorgio Gasparini,&nbsp;Olimpio Galasso\",\"doi\":\"10.2106/JBJS.ST.21.00033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The double-incision technique with bone-tunnel fixation provides anatomical reattachment of a distal biceps tendon rupture to the radial tuberosity<sup>1</sup>. This technique has been described by Boyd and Anderson<sup>2</sup> and was later modified by Morrey et al.<sup>3</sup>. The aim of the procedure is to achieve good return of elbow strength and motion with a low rate of neurological complications.</p><p><strong>Description: </strong>A longitudinal antecubital incision of 3 to 4 cm allows dissection to identify and isolate the lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve (LABCN). Supination of the forearm protects the posterior interosseus nerve, which often cannot be visualized. The distal portion of the distal biceps should be carefully identified and exposed. A high-resistance nonresorbable suture is sewn with use of a Krackow technique to whipstitch the distal 4 cm of the tendon. Alternatively, 2 sutures (4 strands) can be utilized. A curved forceps is placed in the interosseous space to identify the location for the second 4-cm incision, on the dorsal proximal forearm over the tip of the forceps with the forearm pronated. The radial tuberosity is exposed by bluntly separating the common extensor tendons, followed by transection of the supinator fibers. Two drill holes are made 5 mm apart from one another for suture passage. The tendon is passed across a loop of wire, from the anterior to the posterior incision. With the elbow at 90° of flexion and full pronation, the tendon is docked into the trough and the sutures are tied.</p><p><strong>Alternatives: </strong>Alternatively, the surgical repair of the distal biceps tendon rupture can be performed through a single anterior approach<sup>4</sup>. The exposure starts with a curved longitudinal antecubital incision, exploiting the interval between the brachioradialis and pronator teres with radial (lateral) retraction of the brachioradialis and medial retraction of the pronator teres. A single anterior incision allows repair through the use of various types of fixation devices, such as suture anchors, cortical buttons, and interference screws, but seems to carry an increased risk of neurological complications, especially in terms of paresthesias in the distribution of the LABCN. Nonoperative treatment might be acceptable for elderly patients with poor functional demands.</p><p><strong>Rationale: </strong>The double-incision technique with bone-tunnel fixation provides good fixation strength with an expected low rate of neurological complications<sup>1</sup>. This approach offers a useful treatment option for young and active patients with physically demanding lifestyles.</p><p><strong>Expected outcomes: </strong>The double-incision technique is an effective and safe procedure to restore elbow functionality in patients with distal biceps tendon rupture. A meta-analysis<sup>1,4-16</sup> revealed no significant differences in postoperative functional scores following procedures performed via the single-incision compared with double-incision approach. Although the differences were smaller than the minimal clinically important difference<sup>17</sup>, the single-incision technique yielded significantly greater flexion (mean ± standard deviation, 136° ± 13°) and pronation range of motion (79° ± 10°) compared with the double-incision technique (133° ± 13° and 75° ± 14°, respectively) at 2 years postoperatively. No differences in extension and supination were observed. Rates of heterotopic ossification ranged from 0.5% to 11% for the single-incision approach and from 1% to 21.4% for the double-incision approach, with significant differences favoring the single-incision technique, although in the majority of cases the heterotopic ossification was an incidental finding. Neurological complications were found in 24.5% and 13.4% cases for the single- and double-incision techniques, respectively, with a significant difference favoring the double-incision technique. When damage to specific nerves was evaluated, the double-incision technique was associated with significantly less risk of LABCN damage.</p><p><strong>Important tips: </strong>One or 2 high-resistance nonresorbable sutures are sewn with use of a Krackow technique to whipstitch the distal 4 cm of the biceps tendon.A curved forceps is placed in the interosseous space to identify the location for the second incision, on the dorsal proximal forearm over the tip of the forceps.Pronation of the forearm protects the posterior interosseus nerve, which often cannot be visualized during volar dissection and bone fixation.Positioning the tendon more posteriorly on the radial tuberosity allows for optimal biomechanical function.</p><p><strong>Acronyms and abbreviations: </strong>ROM = range of motionCR = conventional radiologyMRI = magnetic resonance imagingUS = ultrasoundLABC = lateral antebrachial cutaneousPIN = posterior interosseous nerveHO = heterotopic ossificationCI = confidence intervalSI = single incisionDI = double incision.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44676,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9931040/pdf/jxt-12-e21.00033.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.ST.21.00033\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.ST.21.00033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

双切口骨隧道固定技术提供了远端二头肌腱断裂与桡骨结节的解剖复位1。该技术由Boyd和anderson描述2,后来由Morrey等人修改3。手术的目的是恢复肘关节的力量和运动,同时降低神经系统并发症的发生率。描述:一个3 - 4厘米的纵向肘前切口允许解剖以识别和分离肱外侧皮神经(LABCN)。前臂旋后保护骨间后神经,这通常是不可见的。肱二头肌远端部分应仔细识别并暴露。使用Krackow技术将高阻力不可吸收缝线缝合在肌腱远端4cm处。或者,可以使用2个缝合线(4股)。将弯曲钳置于骨间间隙以确定第二个4厘米切口的位置,位于钳尖上方的前臂近端背侧,前臂旋前。通过直接分离伸总肌腱暴露桡骨粗隆,然后横切旋后肌纤维。两个钻孔彼此相距5mm,用于缝合通道。肌腱穿过一圈钢丝,从前面到后面的切口。当肘关节屈曲90°并完全旋前时,将肌腱停靠在槽内,并将缝线系紧。替代方法:二头肌远端肌腱断裂的手术修复可通过单路前路进行4。暴露从弯曲的纵向肘前切口开始,利用肱桡肌和旋前圆肌之间的间隙,进行肱桡肌的径向(外侧)缩回和旋前圆肌的内侧缩回。单个前切口可以通过使用各种固定装置进行修复,如缝合锚钉、皮质钮扣和干涉螺钉,但似乎增加了神经系统并发症的风险,特别是在LABCN分布的感觉异常方面。对于功能需求较差的老年患者,非手术治疗可能是可以接受的。理由:双切口骨隧道固定技术具有良好的固定强度和预期的低神经系统并发症1。这种方法为年轻、活跃、体力要求高的患者提供了一种有用的治疗选择。预期结果:双切口技术是恢复二头肌腱远端断裂患者肘关节功能的一种有效且安全的方法。一项荟萃分析显示,与双切口手术相比,单切口手术术后功能评分无显著差异。虽然差异小于最小临床重要差异17,但与双切口技术(分别为133°±13°和75°±14°)相比,单切口技术在术后2年的屈曲(平均±标准差,136°±13°)和旋前运动范围(79°±10°)明显更大。伸展和旋后无差异。单切口入路异位骨化率为0.5% - 11%,双切口入路异位骨化率为1% - 21.4%,尽管在大多数情况下异位骨化是偶然发现的,但单切口入路的异位骨化率有显著差异。单切口和双切口的神经系统并发症发生率分别为24.5%和13.4%,双切口的神经系统并发症发生率差异有统计学意义。当评估对特定神经的损伤时,双切口技术与LABCN损伤的风险显著降低相关。重要提示:使用Krackow技术在二头肌肌腱远端4cm处缝合一至两条高阻力不可吸收缝合线。在骨间间隙放置弯曲的钳以确定第二个切口的位置,在钳尖上方的前臂近端背侧。前臂旋前保护骨间后神经,这在掌侧解剖和骨固定时通常不能被观察到。将肌腱置于桡骨粗隆后方,可获得最佳的生物力学功能。缩略语:ROM =活动范围cr =常规放射学mri =磁共振成像us =超声labc =侧臂前皮肤spin =后骨间神经ho =异位骨化ci =置信区间si =单切口di =双切口
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Double-Incision Technique for the Treatment of Distal Biceps Tendon Rupture.

The double-incision technique with bone-tunnel fixation provides anatomical reattachment of a distal biceps tendon rupture to the radial tuberosity1. This technique has been described by Boyd and Anderson2 and was later modified by Morrey et al.3. The aim of the procedure is to achieve good return of elbow strength and motion with a low rate of neurological complications.

Description: A longitudinal antecubital incision of 3 to 4 cm allows dissection to identify and isolate the lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve (LABCN). Supination of the forearm protects the posterior interosseus nerve, which often cannot be visualized. The distal portion of the distal biceps should be carefully identified and exposed. A high-resistance nonresorbable suture is sewn with use of a Krackow technique to whipstitch the distal 4 cm of the tendon. Alternatively, 2 sutures (4 strands) can be utilized. A curved forceps is placed in the interosseous space to identify the location for the second 4-cm incision, on the dorsal proximal forearm over the tip of the forceps with the forearm pronated. The radial tuberosity is exposed by bluntly separating the common extensor tendons, followed by transection of the supinator fibers. Two drill holes are made 5 mm apart from one another for suture passage. The tendon is passed across a loop of wire, from the anterior to the posterior incision. With the elbow at 90° of flexion and full pronation, the tendon is docked into the trough and the sutures are tied.

Alternatives: Alternatively, the surgical repair of the distal biceps tendon rupture can be performed through a single anterior approach4. The exposure starts with a curved longitudinal antecubital incision, exploiting the interval between the brachioradialis and pronator teres with radial (lateral) retraction of the brachioradialis and medial retraction of the pronator teres. A single anterior incision allows repair through the use of various types of fixation devices, such as suture anchors, cortical buttons, and interference screws, but seems to carry an increased risk of neurological complications, especially in terms of paresthesias in the distribution of the LABCN. Nonoperative treatment might be acceptable for elderly patients with poor functional demands.

Rationale: The double-incision technique with bone-tunnel fixation provides good fixation strength with an expected low rate of neurological complications1. This approach offers a useful treatment option for young and active patients with physically demanding lifestyles.

Expected outcomes: The double-incision technique is an effective and safe procedure to restore elbow functionality in patients with distal biceps tendon rupture. A meta-analysis1,4-16 revealed no significant differences in postoperative functional scores following procedures performed via the single-incision compared with double-incision approach. Although the differences were smaller than the minimal clinically important difference17, the single-incision technique yielded significantly greater flexion (mean ± standard deviation, 136° ± 13°) and pronation range of motion (79° ± 10°) compared with the double-incision technique (133° ± 13° and 75° ± 14°, respectively) at 2 years postoperatively. No differences in extension and supination were observed. Rates of heterotopic ossification ranged from 0.5% to 11% for the single-incision approach and from 1% to 21.4% for the double-incision approach, with significant differences favoring the single-incision technique, although in the majority of cases the heterotopic ossification was an incidental finding. Neurological complications were found in 24.5% and 13.4% cases for the single- and double-incision techniques, respectively, with a significant difference favoring the double-incision technique. When damage to specific nerves was evaluated, the double-incision technique was associated with significantly less risk of LABCN damage.

Important tips: One or 2 high-resistance nonresorbable sutures are sewn with use of a Krackow technique to whipstitch the distal 4 cm of the biceps tendon.A curved forceps is placed in the interosseous space to identify the location for the second incision, on the dorsal proximal forearm over the tip of the forceps.Pronation of the forearm protects the posterior interosseus nerve, which often cannot be visualized during volar dissection and bone fixation.Positioning the tendon more posteriorly on the radial tuberosity allows for optimal biomechanical function.

Acronyms and abbreviations: ROM = range of motionCR = conventional radiologyMRI = magnetic resonance imagingUS = ultrasoundLABC = lateral antebrachial cutaneousPIN = posterior interosseous nerveHO = heterotopic ossificationCI = confidence intervalSI = single incisionDI = double incision.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques (JBJS EST) is the premier journal describing how to perform orthopaedic surgical procedures, verified by evidence-based outcomes, vetted by peer review, while utilizing online delivery, imagery and video to optimize the educational experience, thereby enhancing patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信