重新审视佛罗里达古人类材料的年代。

IF 0.7 4区 社会学 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY
Lee R Berger, John Hawks
{"title":"重新审视佛罗里达古人类材料的年代。","authors":"Lee R Berger,&nbsp;John Hawks","doi":"10.1127/homo/2023/1541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In 1996, Grün and coworkers provided an ESR age determination for a hominin molar from Florisbad, South Africa, at 259 ± 35 ka. The most anatomically informative hominin specimen from Florisbad is a fragmentary craniofacial specimen, attributed by many to early <i>Homo sapiens</i>, which has been assumed to derive from the same individual as this tooth. Since 1996, evidence about the evolutionary context for the later Middle Pleistocene and its associated hominins in Africa had markedly changed. If the Florisbad date is accurate and if the molar is associated with the craniofacial specimen, this evidence may suggest that <i>Homo naledi</i> coexisted in time and geography with <i>H. sapiens</i> in southern Africa. Thus, the accuracy for all dates needs critical investigation. This study examines the published record of excavation and subsequent analyses for the Florisbad material. We find that the contemporary records raise doubt about the contemporaneity of the tooth and calvaria. The site's complex stratigraphy and the details about the tooth's discovery also pose challenges for the previous ESR age estimate. Because the fragmentary cranial specimen has value for morphological comparisons, developing additional means of understanding its geological age is necessary. The current data do not demonstrate the presence of <i>H. sapiens</i> in southern Africa at ~260 ka.</p>","PeriodicalId":46714,"journal":{"name":"Homo-Journal of Comparative Human Biology","volume":"74 1","pages":"55-60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revisiting the age of the Florisbad hominin material.\",\"authors\":\"Lee R Berger,&nbsp;John Hawks\",\"doi\":\"10.1127/homo/2023/1541\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In 1996, Grün and coworkers provided an ESR age determination for a hominin molar from Florisbad, South Africa, at 259 ± 35 ka. The most anatomically informative hominin specimen from Florisbad is a fragmentary craniofacial specimen, attributed by many to early <i>Homo sapiens</i>, which has been assumed to derive from the same individual as this tooth. Since 1996, evidence about the evolutionary context for the later Middle Pleistocene and its associated hominins in Africa had markedly changed. If the Florisbad date is accurate and if the molar is associated with the craniofacial specimen, this evidence may suggest that <i>Homo naledi</i> coexisted in time and geography with <i>H. sapiens</i> in southern Africa. Thus, the accuracy for all dates needs critical investigation. This study examines the published record of excavation and subsequent analyses for the Florisbad material. We find that the contemporary records raise doubt about the contemporaneity of the tooth and calvaria. The site's complex stratigraphy and the details about the tooth's discovery also pose challenges for the previous ESR age estimate. Because the fragmentary cranial specimen has value for morphological comparisons, developing additional means of understanding its geological age is necessary. The current data do not demonstrate the presence of <i>H. sapiens</i> in southern Africa at ~260 ka.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46714,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Homo-Journal of Comparative Human Biology\",\"volume\":\"74 1\",\"pages\":\"55-60\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Homo-Journal of Comparative Human Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1127/homo/2023/1541\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Homo-Journal of Comparative Human Biology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1127/homo/2023/1541","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1996年,gr及其同事对来自南非弗洛里斯巴德的古人类臼齿进行了ESR年龄测定,测定时间为259±35 ka。在弗洛里斯巴德发现的最具解剖学意义的古人类标本是一个残缺的颅面标本,许多人认为它属于早期智人,并被认为与这颗牙齿来自同一个人。自1996年以来,关于非洲中更新世晚期及其相关古人类进化背景的证据发生了显著变化。如果弗洛里斯巴德的日期是准确的,如果这颗臼齿与颅面标本有关,那么这一证据可能表明,在时间和地理上,纳莱迪人与非洲南部的智人共存。因此,所有日期的准确性需要进行严格的调查。本研究考察了已发表的弗洛里斯巴德材料的挖掘记录和随后的分析。我们发现,当代记录对牙齿和颅骨的同时代性提出了怀疑。该地点复杂的地层和牙齿发现的细节也给之前的ESR年龄估计带来了挑战。由于碎片颅骨标本具有形态学比较的价值,因此有必要开发更多的方法来了解其地质年龄。目前的资料不能证明智人在~260 ka的非洲南部存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Revisiting the age of the Florisbad hominin material.

In 1996, Grün and coworkers provided an ESR age determination for a hominin molar from Florisbad, South Africa, at 259 ± 35 ka. The most anatomically informative hominin specimen from Florisbad is a fragmentary craniofacial specimen, attributed by many to early Homo sapiens, which has been assumed to derive from the same individual as this tooth. Since 1996, evidence about the evolutionary context for the later Middle Pleistocene and its associated hominins in Africa had markedly changed. If the Florisbad date is accurate and if the molar is associated with the craniofacial specimen, this evidence may suggest that Homo naledi coexisted in time and geography with H. sapiens in southern Africa. Thus, the accuracy for all dates needs critical investigation. This study examines the published record of excavation and subsequent analyses for the Florisbad material. We find that the contemporary records raise doubt about the contemporaneity of the tooth and calvaria. The site's complex stratigraphy and the details about the tooth's discovery also pose challenges for the previous ESR age estimate. Because the fragmentary cranial specimen has value for morphological comparisons, developing additional means of understanding its geological age is necessary. The current data do not demonstrate the presence of H. sapiens in southern Africa at ~260 ka.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信