暂时性内牵引治疗重度脊柱侧凸。

IF 1 Q3 SURGERY
Daniel Badin, David L Skaggs, Paul D Sponseller
{"title":"暂时性内牵引治疗重度脊柱侧凸。","authors":"Daniel Badin,&nbsp;David L Skaggs,&nbsp;Paul D Sponseller","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.ST.22.00006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Temporary internal distraction (TID) is a surgical technique that can be utilized to correct severe scoliotic deformities. It allows the correction of severe curves (i.e., exceeding 90° to 100°) while minimizing the risk of neurologic injury associated with large corrections<sup>1,2</sup>.</p><p><strong>Description: </strong>TID can be performed as a single or staged procedure. During the first part, cephalad anchors are placed on the spine or ribs, and caudad anchors are placed on the spine or pelvis. Temporary distraction rods are inserted, osteotomies and/or releases are performed, and iterative distractions are utilized for the duration of the procedure. If adequate correction is achieved, the final fusion may be completed at this time. If not, a staged approach may be performed: the wound is closed and the patient is returned to the operating room 1 to 3 weeks later, at which time the temporary rods are removed, further distraction is performed, and the final fusion instrumentation is placed. Around 80% to 90% cumulative correction of the major coronal angle should be achievable.</p><p><strong>Alternatives: </strong>The mainstay of treatment for large scoliotic curves is typically surgical correction and fusion. The main alternative to TID is traditional halo-gravity traction followed by fusion<sup>3-5</sup>. In rare cases, nonoperative treatment may be appropriate if comorbidities and/or prognoses that preclude surgery exist.</p><p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Halo traction is an effective adjunct for the treatment of large scoliotic curves; nonetheless, it has several disadvantages. First, halo traction requires a prolonged hospital stay with restriction of mobility and interference with daily activities. Second, this procedure may be less effective in cases of lumbar deformity, in which halo traction achieves limited tensile forces. Third, this procedure is associated with several risks, such as cranial nerve injuries and pin track complications<sup>3-6</sup>. Finally, halo traction is contraindicated for certain conditions, such as cervical instability.TID, on the other hand, involves the application of iterative corrective forces directly to the area of deformity, allowing a stronger correction<sup>1</sup>. TID takes advantage of the viscoelastic nature of the spine to achieve a higher percent correction compared with halo traction, with a low risk of neurologic injury<sup>1,2</sup>. TID also avoids the prolonged hospital stay, mobility restriction, and complications associated with halo traction. When performed as a staged procedure, TID allows accurate assessment of neurologic function with the patient awake and moving.TID is most effective for severe scoliotic multisegment deformities rather than short rigid curves, which are better treated by osteotomies.</p><p><strong>Expected outcomes: </strong>This procedure provides satisfactory outcomes and a low risk of complications. In our retrospective case series, TID resulted in a mean major coronal angle correction of 53% after the first distraction and 80% to 90% after definitive fusion<sup>1</sup>. The overall percent correction was higher than that reported for halo traction<sup>1</sup>.The major risks of TID include infection and spinal injury. The risk of infection is decreased by antibiotic prophylaxis, perioperative nutritional optimization, and careful soft-tissue handling and wound closure. The risk of spinal cord injury is decreased by intraoperative neuromonitoring. Neuromonitoring changes occur in around 40% of cases, but these are almost always reversible and seldom lead to neurologic deficits if detected and appropriately treated, as described below<sup>2</sup>.Although risks exist, no complications have occurred among the 32 cases we presented in our series<sup>1,2</sup>.</p><p><strong>Important tips: </strong>Temporary anchors should be expected to loosen during distraction. Therefore, temporary anchors must be placed strategically so as to not jeopardize the purchase of the final implants.Gradual corrections must be performed over time, utilizing the viscoelastic nature of the spine to minimize risk of neurologic injury.Accurate neuromonitoring is essential for this procedure.If neuromonitoring changes occur, distraction must be stopped and the correction attained must be decreased.</p><p><strong>Acronyms and abbreviations: </strong>TID = temporary internal distractionLIV = lowest instrumented vertebraAP = anteroposteriorTP = transverse processSAI = sacral-alar-iliacMAP = mean arterial pressureTPN = total parenteral nutritionVCR = vertebral column resectionJIS = juvenile idiopathic scoliosisAIS = adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":44676,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9931036/pdf/jxt-12-e22.00006.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Temporary Internal Distraction for Severe Scoliosis.\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Badin,&nbsp;David L Skaggs,&nbsp;Paul D Sponseller\",\"doi\":\"10.2106/JBJS.ST.22.00006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Temporary internal distraction (TID) is a surgical technique that can be utilized to correct severe scoliotic deformities. It allows the correction of severe curves (i.e., exceeding 90° to 100°) while minimizing the risk of neurologic injury associated with large corrections<sup>1,2</sup>.</p><p><strong>Description: </strong>TID can be performed as a single or staged procedure. During the first part, cephalad anchors are placed on the spine or ribs, and caudad anchors are placed on the spine or pelvis. Temporary distraction rods are inserted, osteotomies and/or releases are performed, and iterative distractions are utilized for the duration of the procedure. If adequate correction is achieved, the final fusion may be completed at this time. If not, a staged approach may be performed: the wound is closed and the patient is returned to the operating room 1 to 3 weeks later, at which time the temporary rods are removed, further distraction is performed, and the final fusion instrumentation is placed. Around 80% to 90% cumulative correction of the major coronal angle should be achievable.</p><p><strong>Alternatives: </strong>The mainstay of treatment for large scoliotic curves is typically surgical correction and fusion. The main alternative to TID is traditional halo-gravity traction followed by fusion<sup>3-5</sup>. In rare cases, nonoperative treatment may be appropriate if comorbidities and/or prognoses that preclude surgery exist.</p><p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Halo traction is an effective adjunct for the treatment of large scoliotic curves; nonetheless, it has several disadvantages. First, halo traction requires a prolonged hospital stay with restriction of mobility and interference with daily activities. Second, this procedure may be less effective in cases of lumbar deformity, in which halo traction achieves limited tensile forces. Third, this procedure is associated with several risks, such as cranial nerve injuries and pin track complications<sup>3-6</sup>. Finally, halo traction is contraindicated for certain conditions, such as cervical instability.TID, on the other hand, involves the application of iterative corrective forces directly to the area of deformity, allowing a stronger correction<sup>1</sup>. TID takes advantage of the viscoelastic nature of the spine to achieve a higher percent correction compared with halo traction, with a low risk of neurologic injury<sup>1,2</sup>. TID also avoids the prolonged hospital stay, mobility restriction, and complications associated with halo traction. When performed as a staged procedure, TID allows accurate assessment of neurologic function with the patient awake and moving.TID is most effective for severe scoliotic multisegment deformities rather than short rigid curves, which are better treated by osteotomies.</p><p><strong>Expected outcomes: </strong>This procedure provides satisfactory outcomes and a low risk of complications. In our retrospective case series, TID resulted in a mean major coronal angle correction of 53% after the first distraction and 80% to 90% after definitive fusion<sup>1</sup>. The overall percent correction was higher than that reported for halo traction<sup>1</sup>.The major risks of TID include infection and spinal injury. The risk of infection is decreased by antibiotic prophylaxis, perioperative nutritional optimization, and careful soft-tissue handling and wound closure. The risk of spinal cord injury is decreased by intraoperative neuromonitoring. Neuromonitoring changes occur in around 40% of cases, but these are almost always reversible and seldom lead to neurologic deficits if detected and appropriately treated, as described below<sup>2</sup>.Although risks exist, no complications have occurred among the 32 cases we presented in our series<sup>1,2</sup>.</p><p><strong>Important tips: </strong>Temporary anchors should be expected to loosen during distraction. Therefore, temporary anchors must be placed strategically so as to not jeopardize the purchase of the final implants.Gradual corrections must be performed over time, utilizing the viscoelastic nature of the spine to minimize risk of neurologic injury.Accurate neuromonitoring is essential for this procedure.If neuromonitoring changes occur, distraction must be stopped and the correction attained must be decreased.</p><p><strong>Acronyms and abbreviations: </strong>TID = temporary internal distractionLIV = lowest instrumented vertebraAP = anteroposteriorTP = transverse processSAI = sacral-alar-iliacMAP = mean arterial pressureTPN = total parenteral nutritionVCR = vertebral column resectionJIS = juvenile idiopathic scoliosisAIS = adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44676,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9931036/pdf/jxt-12-e22.00006.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.ST.22.00006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.ST.22.00006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

暂时性内牵张术(TID)是一种外科技术,可用于纠正严重的脊柱侧凸畸形。它允许矫正严重的弯曲(即超过90°至100°),同时最大限度地减少与大矫正相关的神经损伤风险1,2。说明:TID可以作为单个或分阶段的过程执行。在第一部分中,头侧锚钉放置在脊柱或肋骨上,尾侧锚钉放置在脊柱或骨盆上。插入临时牵引棒,进行截骨术和/或松解术,并在手术期间反复使用牵引棒。如果得到适当的矫正,此时可以完成最终的融合。如果不能,可采取分阶段入路:1 - 3周后关闭伤口,患者返回手术室,此时取出临时棒,进一步撑开,放置最终融合内固定物。主冠状角的累计校正应达到80% ~ 90%左右。替代方案:治疗大脊柱侧弯的主要方法是典型的手术矫正和融合。TID的主要替代方案是传统的晕重力牵引,然后融合3-5。在极少数情况下,如果存在合并症和/或预后不适合手术,非手术治疗可能是合适的。理由:Halo牵引是治疗大脊柱侧弯的有效辅助手段;然而,它也有一些缺点。首先,晕轮牵引需要长时间住院,行动受限,日常活动受到干扰。其次,在腰椎畸形的情况下,这种方法可能效果较差,因为晕轮牵引只能获得有限的拉力。第三,该手术有一些风险,如颅神经损伤和针轨并发症3-6。最后,晕轮牵引在某些情况下是禁忌的,如颈椎不稳定。另一方面,TID涉及将迭代矫正力直接应用于畸形区域,从而实现更强的矫正1。与晕轮牵引相比,TID利用了脊柱的粘弹性,矫正率更高,神经损伤风险低1,2。TID也避免了延长住院时间、活动受限和与晕轮牵引相关的并发症。当分期进行时,TID可以在患者清醒和活动时准确评估神经功能。对于严重的脊柱侧弯多节段畸形,TID比短的刚性弯曲更有效,短的刚性弯曲最好采用截骨术治疗。预期结果:该手术结果令人满意,并发症风险低。在我们的回顾性病例系列中,TID导致首次牵张后平均主要冠状角矫正率为53%,最终融合后平均矫正率为80%至90%。总体修正百分比高于光环牵引力的报告1。TID的主要风险包括感染和脊髓损伤。通过抗生素预防,围手术期营养优化,仔细处理软组织和伤口关闭,感染风险降低。术中神经监测可降低脊髓损伤的风险。大约40%的病例发生神经监测变化,但如果发现并适当治疗,这些变化几乎总是可逆的,很少导致神经功能缺损,如下所述2。虽然存在风险,但在我们报道的32例病例中没有发生并发症1,2。重要提示:在分散注意力的过程中,临时锚应该会松动。因此,临时锚必须有策略地放置,以免危及最终种植体的购买。逐渐矫正必须随着时间的推移,利用脊柱的粘弹性,以尽量减少神经损伤的风险。准确的神经监测对该手术至关重要。如果发生神经监测变化,必须停止分心,必须减少矫正。首字母缩写:TID =暂时性内牵引术liv =最低固定椎体ap =正反位ortp =横突sai =骶翼髂map =平均动脉压pn =全肠外营养vcr =脊柱切除术jis =青少年特发性脊柱侧凸isis =青少年特发性脊柱侧凸
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Temporary Internal Distraction for Severe Scoliosis.

Temporary internal distraction (TID) is a surgical technique that can be utilized to correct severe scoliotic deformities. It allows the correction of severe curves (i.e., exceeding 90° to 100°) while minimizing the risk of neurologic injury associated with large corrections1,2.

Description: TID can be performed as a single or staged procedure. During the first part, cephalad anchors are placed on the spine or ribs, and caudad anchors are placed on the spine or pelvis. Temporary distraction rods are inserted, osteotomies and/or releases are performed, and iterative distractions are utilized for the duration of the procedure. If adequate correction is achieved, the final fusion may be completed at this time. If not, a staged approach may be performed: the wound is closed and the patient is returned to the operating room 1 to 3 weeks later, at which time the temporary rods are removed, further distraction is performed, and the final fusion instrumentation is placed. Around 80% to 90% cumulative correction of the major coronal angle should be achievable.

Alternatives: The mainstay of treatment for large scoliotic curves is typically surgical correction and fusion. The main alternative to TID is traditional halo-gravity traction followed by fusion3-5. In rare cases, nonoperative treatment may be appropriate if comorbidities and/or prognoses that preclude surgery exist.

Rationale: Halo traction is an effective adjunct for the treatment of large scoliotic curves; nonetheless, it has several disadvantages. First, halo traction requires a prolonged hospital stay with restriction of mobility and interference with daily activities. Second, this procedure may be less effective in cases of lumbar deformity, in which halo traction achieves limited tensile forces. Third, this procedure is associated with several risks, such as cranial nerve injuries and pin track complications3-6. Finally, halo traction is contraindicated for certain conditions, such as cervical instability.TID, on the other hand, involves the application of iterative corrective forces directly to the area of deformity, allowing a stronger correction1. TID takes advantage of the viscoelastic nature of the spine to achieve a higher percent correction compared with halo traction, with a low risk of neurologic injury1,2. TID also avoids the prolonged hospital stay, mobility restriction, and complications associated with halo traction. When performed as a staged procedure, TID allows accurate assessment of neurologic function with the patient awake and moving.TID is most effective for severe scoliotic multisegment deformities rather than short rigid curves, which are better treated by osteotomies.

Expected outcomes: This procedure provides satisfactory outcomes and a low risk of complications. In our retrospective case series, TID resulted in a mean major coronal angle correction of 53% after the first distraction and 80% to 90% after definitive fusion1. The overall percent correction was higher than that reported for halo traction1.The major risks of TID include infection and spinal injury. The risk of infection is decreased by antibiotic prophylaxis, perioperative nutritional optimization, and careful soft-tissue handling and wound closure. The risk of spinal cord injury is decreased by intraoperative neuromonitoring. Neuromonitoring changes occur in around 40% of cases, but these are almost always reversible and seldom lead to neurologic deficits if detected and appropriately treated, as described below2.Although risks exist, no complications have occurred among the 32 cases we presented in our series1,2.

Important tips: Temporary anchors should be expected to loosen during distraction. Therefore, temporary anchors must be placed strategically so as to not jeopardize the purchase of the final implants.Gradual corrections must be performed over time, utilizing the viscoelastic nature of the spine to minimize risk of neurologic injury.Accurate neuromonitoring is essential for this procedure.If neuromonitoring changes occur, distraction must be stopped and the correction attained must be decreased.

Acronyms and abbreviations: TID = temporary internal distractionLIV = lowest instrumented vertebraAP = anteroposteriorTP = transverse processSAI = sacral-alar-iliacMAP = mean arterial pressureTPN = total parenteral nutritionVCR = vertebral column resectionJIS = juvenile idiopathic scoliosisAIS = adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques (JBJS EST) is the premier journal describing how to perform orthopaedic surgical procedures, verified by evidence-based outcomes, vetted by peer review, while utilizing online delivery, imagery and video to optimize the educational experience, thereby enhancing patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信