大麻使用负面后果的风险和保护因素的范围审查。

IF 2 Q3 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Timothy J Grigsby, Andrea Lopez, Larisa Albers, Christopher J Rogers, Myriam Forster
{"title":"大麻使用负面后果的风险和保护因素的范围审查。","authors":"Timothy J Grigsby,&nbsp;Andrea Lopez,&nbsp;Larisa Albers,&nbsp;Christopher J Rogers,&nbsp;Myriam Forster","doi":"10.1177/11782218231166622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Numerous reviews have examined risk and protective factors for alcohol-related negative consequences, but no equivalent review of risk and protective factors exists for cannabis-related negative consequences (CRNCs)-a gap filled by the present study. This scoping review examined survey-based research of risk and protective factors for CRNCs such as neglecting responsibilities, blacking out, or needing more cannabis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar) were searched for peer-reviewed manuscripts published between January 1, 1990, and December 31, 2021. A qualitative synthesis was performed using the matrix method and the results were organized using the socioecological model as a framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-three studies were included in the review. There was considerable variation in measures and operationalizations of CRNCs across studies. Risk factors were identified in the <i>intrapersonal</i> (depression, social anxiety, PTSD, impulsivity, sensation seeking, motives, expectancies), <i>interpersonal/community</i> (trauma, victimization, family and peer substance use, social norms), and <i>social/policy</i> (education, employment, community attachment, legalization, availability of substances) domains of influence. Protective behavioral strategies were a robust protective factor for CRNCs. Males consistently reported more CRNCs than females, but there were no differences observed across race.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Future research should identify person- and product-specific patterns of CRNCs to refine theoretical models of cannabis misuse and addiction. Public health interventions to reduce the risk of negative consequences from cannabis should consider utilizing multilevel interventions to attenuate the cumulative risk from a combination of psychological, contextual, and social influences.</p>","PeriodicalId":22185,"journal":{"name":"Substance Abuse: Research and Treatment","volume":"17 ","pages":"11782218231166622"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/6b/4e/10.1177_11782218231166622.PMC10087658.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Scoping Review of Risk and Protective Factors for Negative Cannabis Use Consequences.\",\"authors\":\"Timothy J Grigsby,&nbsp;Andrea Lopez,&nbsp;Larisa Albers,&nbsp;Christopher J Rogers,&nbsp;Myriam Forster\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/11782218231166622\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Numerous reviews have examined risk and protective factors for alcohol-related negative consequences, but no equivalent review of risk and protective factors exists for cannabis-related negative consequences (CRNCs)-a gap filled by the present study. This scoping review examined survey-based research of risk and protective factors for CRNCs such as neglecting responsibilities, blacking out, or needing more cannabis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar) were searched for peer-reviewed manuscripts published between January 1, 1990, and December 31, 2021. A qualitative synthesis was performed using the matrix method and the results were organized using the socioecological model as a framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-three studies were included in the review. There was considerable variation in measures and operationalizations of CRNCs across studies. Risk factors were identified in the <i>intrapersonal</i> (depression, social anxiety, PTSD, impulsivity, sensation seeking, motives, expectancies), <i>interpersonal/community</i> (trauma, victimization, family and peer substance use, social norms), and <i>social/policy</i> (education, employment, community attachment, legalization, availability of substances) domains of influence. Protective behavioral strategies were a robust protective factor for CRNCs. Males consistently reported more CRNCs than females, but there were no differences observed across race.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Future research should identify person- and product-specific patterns of CRNCs to refine theoretical models of cannabis misuse and addiction. Public health interventions to reduce the risk of negative consequences from cannabis should consider utilizing multilevel interventions to attenuate the cumulative risk from a combination of psychological, contextual, and social influences.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22185,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Substance Abuse: Research and Treatment\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"11782218231166622\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/6b/4e/10.1177_11782218231166622.PMC10087658.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Substance Abuse: Research and Treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/11782218231166622\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance Abuse: Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11782218231166622","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:许多综述研究了酒精相关负面后果的风险和保护因素,但没有对大麻相关负面后果(crnc)的风险和保护因素进行相应的综述-本研究填补了这一空白。这一范围审查审查了基于调查的crnc风险和保护因素的研究,如忽视责任、停电或需要更多的大麻。方法:检索PubMed、PsycINFO和Google Scholar三个数据库,检索1990年1月1日至2021年12月31日发表的同行评议稿件。使用矩阵法进行定性综合,并使用社会生态模型作为框架组织结果。结果:83项研究被纳入综述。在不同的研究中,crnc的测量和操作存在相当大的差异。风险因素在人际关系(抑郁、社交焦虑、创伤后应激障碍、冲动、寻求感觉、动机、期望)、人际/社区(创伤、受害、家庭和同伴物质使用、社会规范)和社会/政策(教育、就业、社区依恋、合法化、物质可得性)的影响领域中被确定。保护行为策略是crnc的一个强有力的保护因素。男性报告的crnc始终多于女性,但在种族间没有观察到差异。结论:未来的研究应该确定crnc的个人和产品特定模式,以完善大麻滥用和成瘾的理论模型。旨在减少大麻负面后果风险的公共卫生干预措施应考虑利用多层次干预措施,以减轻心理、环境和社会影响综合造成的累积风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A Scoping Review of Risk and Protective Factors for Negative Cannabis Use Consequences.

A Scoping Review of Risk and Protective Factors for Negative Cannabis Use Consequences.

A Scoping Review of Risk and Protective Factors for Negative Cannabis Use Consequences.

Objective: Numerous reviews have examined risk and protective factors for alcohol-related negative consequences, but no equivalent review of risk and protective factors exists for cannabis-related negative consequences (CRNCs)-a gap filled by the present study. This scoping review examined survey-based research of risk and protective factors for CRNCs such as neglecting responsibilities, blacking out, or needing more cannabis.

Methods: Three databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar) were searched for peer-reviewed manuscripts published between January 1, 1990, and December 31, 2021. A qualitative synthesis was performed using the matrix method and the results were organized using the socioecological model as a framework.

Results: Eighty-three studies were included in the review. There was considerable variation in measures and operationalizations of CRNCs across studies. Risk factors were identified in the intrapersonal (depression, social anxiety, PTSD, impulsivity, sensation seeking, motives, expectancies), interpersonal/community (trauma, victimization, family and peer substance use, social norms), and social/policy (education, employment, community attachment, legalization, availability of substances) domains of influence. Protective behavioral strategies were a robust protective factor for CRNCs. Males consistently reported more CRNCs than females, but there were no differences observed across race.

Conclusions: Future research should identify person- and product-specific patterns of CRNCs to refine theoretical models of cannabis misuse and addiction. Public health interventions to reduce the risk of negative consequences from cannabis should consider utilizing multilevel interventions to attenuate the cumulative risk from a combination of psychological, contextual, and social influences.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
50
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信