使用风湿病仪表板加强护理伙伴关系:汇集对患者和临床医生最重要的事情。

Aricca D Van Citters, Alysha J Taxter, Stephanie D Mathew, Erica Lawson, Joad Eseddi, Vincent Del Gaizo, Jabeen Ahmad, Puneet Bajaj, Stacy Courtnay, Lesley Davila, Brittany Donaldson, Yukiko Kimura, Tzielan Lee, John N Mecchella, Eugene C Nelson, Scott Pompa, Doreen Tabussi, Lisa C Johnson
{"title":"使用风湿病仪表板加强护理伙伴关系:汇集对患者和临床医生最重要的事情。","authors":"Aricca D Van Citters,&nbsp;Alysha J Taxter,&nbsp;Stephanie D Mathew,&nbsp;Erica Lawson,&nbsp;Joad Eseddi,&nbsp;Vincent Del Gaizo,&nbsp;Jabeen Ahmad,&nbsp;Puneet Bajaj,&nbsp;Stacy Courtnay,&nbsp;Lesley Davila,&nbsp;Brittany Donaldson,&nbsp;Yukiko Kimura,&nbsp;Tzielan Lee,&nbsp;John N Mecchella,&nbsp;Eugene C Nelson,&nbsp;Scott Pompa,&nbsp;Doreen Tabussi,&nbsp;Lisa C Johnson","doi":"10.1002/acr2.11533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Dashboards can support person-centered care by helping people partner with their clinicians to coproduce care based on preferences, shared decision-making, and evidence-based treatments. We engaged caregivers of children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), adults with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and clinicians in a pilot study to assess their experiences and the utility and impact of an electronic previsit questionnaire and point-of-care dashboard to support coproduction of rheumatology care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We employed a mixed-methods design to assess users' perceptions of a customized electronic health record rheumatology module at four pediatric rheumatology practices and two adult rheumatology practices. We surveyed a convenience sample of caregivers of children with JIA (n = 113), adults with RA (n = 116), and clinicians (n = 12). We conducted semistructured interviews with 13 caregivers and patients and six care teams. Experiences were evaluated using descriptive statistics and thematic analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Caregivers of children with JIA and adults with RA reported the dashboards were useful during discussions (88%) and helped them talk about what mattered most (82%), make health care decisions (83%), and create a treatment plan (77%). Clinicians provided similar feedback. Two-thirds (67%) of caregivers and adults and 55% of clinicians would recommend the dashboard to peers. System usability scores (77.1 ± 15.6) were above average. Dashboards helped users make sense of health information, communicate more effectively, and make decisions. Improvements to the dashboards and workflows could enhance patient self-management and clinician efficiency.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Visual point-of-care dashboards can support caregivers, patients, and clinicians to coproduce rheumatology care. Findings demonstrate a need to spread and scale for broader benefit and impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":7084,"journal":{"name":"ACR Open Rheumatology","volume":"5 4","pages":"190-200"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/1a/21/ACR2-5-190.PMC10100696.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing Care Partnerships Using a Rheumatology Dashboard: Bringing Together What Matters Most to Both Patients and Clinicians.\",\"authors\":\"Aricca D Van Citters,&nbsp;Alysha J Taxter,&nbsp;Stephanie D Mathew,&nbsp;Erica Lawson,&nbsp;Joad Eseddi,&nbsp;Vincent Del Gaizo,&nbsp;Jabeen Ahmad,&nbsp;Puneet Bajaj,&nbsp;Stacy Courtnay,&nbsp;Lesley Davila,&nbsp;Brittany Donaldson,&nbsp;Yukiko Kimura,&nbsp;Tzielan Lee,&nbsp;John N Mecchella,&nbsp;Eugene C Nelson,&nbsp;Scott Pompa,&nbsp;Doreen Tabussi,&nbsp;Lisa C Johnson\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/acr2.11533\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Dashboards can support person-centered care by helping people partner with their clinicians to coproduce care based on preferences, shared decision-making, and evidence-based treatments. We engaged caregivers of children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), adults with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and clinicians in a pilot study to assess their experiences and the utility and impact of an electronic previsit questionnaire and point-of-care dashboard to support coproduction of rheumatology care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We employed a mixed-methods design to assess users' perceptions of a customized electronic health record rheumatology module at four pediatric rheumatology practices and two adult rheumatology practices. We surveyed a convenience sample of caregivers of children with JIA (n = 113), adults with RA (n = 116), and clinicians (n = 12). We conducted semistructured interviews with 13 caregivers and patients and six care teams. Experiences were evaluated using descriptive statistics and thematic analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Caregivers of children with JIA and adults with RA reported the dashboards were useful during discussions (88%) and helped them talk about what mattered most (82%), make health care decisions (83%), and create a treatment plan (77%). Clinicians provided similar feedback. Two-thirds (67%) of caregivers and adults and 55% of clinicians would recommend the dashboard to peers. System usability scores (77.1 ± 15.6) were above average. Dashboards helped users make sense of health information, communicate more effectively, and make decisions. Improvements to the dashboards and workflows could enhance patient self-management and clinician efficiency.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Visual point-of-care dashboards can support caregivers, patients, and clinicians to coproduce rheumatology care. Findings demonstrate a need to spread and scale for broader benefit and impact.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7084,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACR Open Rheumatology\",\"volume\":\"5 4\",\"pages\":\"190-200\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/1a/21/ACR2-5-190.PMC10100696.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACR Open Rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/acr2.11533\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACR Open Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acr2.11533","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:仪表板可以支持以人为本的护理,帮助人们与临床医生合作,根据偏好、共同决策和循证治疗共同生产护理。我们让患有幼年特发性关节炎(JIA)的儿童、患有类风湿关节炎(RA)的成人的护理人员和临床医生参与了一项试点研究,以评估他们的经验、电子预诊问卷和护理点仪表板的效用和影响,以支持风湿病护理的联合生产。方法:我们采用混合方法设计来评估用户对四家儿科风湿病诊所和两家成人风湿病诊所定制的电子健康记录风湿病模块的看法。我们调查了JIA患儿(n = 113)、RA成人(n = 116)和临床医生(n = 12)的方便样本。我们对13名护理人员和患者以及6个护理团队进行了半结构化访谈。利用描述性统计和专题分析对经验进行评价。结果:JIA儿童和RA成人的护理人员报告说,仪表板在讨论中是有用的(88%),帮助他们谈论最重要的事情(82%),做出医疗保健决定(83%),并制定治疗计划(77%)。临床医生提供了类似的反馈。三分之二(67%)的护理人员和成年人以及55%的临床医生会向同行推荐仪表板。系统可用性得分(77.1±15.6)高于平均水平。仪表板帮助用户理解健康信息,更有效地沟通,并做出决策。仪表板和工作流程的改进可以提高患者的自我管理和临床医生的效率。结论:可视化的护理点仪表板可以支持护理人员、患者和临床医生共同进行风湿病护理。研究结果表明,需要传播和扩大规模,以获得更广泛的利益和影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Enhancing Care Partnerships Using a Rheumatology Dashboard: Bringing Together What Matters Most to Both Patients and Clinicians.

Enhancing Care Partnerships Using a Rheumatology Dashboard: Bringing Together What Matters Most to Both Patients and Clinicians.

Enhancing Care Partnerships Using a Rheumatology Dashboard: Bringing Together What Matters Most to Both Patients and Clinicians.

Objective: Dashboards can support person-centered care by helping people partner with their clinicians to coproduce care based on preferences, shared decision-making, and evidence-based treatments. We engaged caregivers of children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), adults with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and clinicians in a pilot study to assess their experiences and the utility and impact of an electronic previsit questionnaire and point-of-care dashboard to support coproduction of rheumatology care.

Methods: We employed a mixed-methods design to assess users' perceptions of a customized electronic health record rheumatology module at four pediatric rheumatology practices and two adult rheumatology practices. We surveyed a convenience sample of caregivers of children with JIA (n = 113), adults with RA (n = 116), and clinicians (n = 12). We conducted semistructured interviews with 13 caregivers and patients and six care teams. Experiences were evaluated using descriptive statistics and thematic analyses.

Results: Caregivers of children with JIA and adults with RA reported the dashboards were useful during discussions (88%) and helped them talk about what mattered most (82%), make health care decisions (83%), and create a treatment plan (77%). Clinicians provided similar feedback. Two-thirds (67%) of caregivers and adults and 55% of clinicians would recommend the dashboard to peers. System usability scores (77.1 ± 15.6) were above average. Dashboards helped users make sense of health information, communicate more effectively, and make decisions. Improvements to the dashboards and workflows could enhance patient self-management and clinician efficiency.

Conclusion: Visual point-of-care dashboards can support caregivers, patients, and clinicians to coproduce rheumatology care. Findings demonstrate a need to spread and scale for broader benefit and impact.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信