超越种族相连的命运:少数族裔间的政治团结与政治参与》(Beyond Racial Linked Fate: Inter-Minority Political Solidarity and Political Participation)。

IF 3.3 1区 社会学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Yoshira D Macías Mejía
{"title":"超越种族相连的命运:少数族裔间的政治团结与政治参与》(Beyond Racial Linked Fate: Inter-Minority Political Solidarity and Political Participation)。","authors":"Yoshira D Macías Mejía","doi":"10.1007/s11109-023-09861-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examines the various patterns of political participation among Latinos, Blacks and Asians Americans. To assess these patterns of political participation among these three groups, I employ the Collaborative Multiracial Post-election Survey (CMPS) 2016. I use two key measures: one is the original measure of linked fate and the other is immigrant linked fate, both which are available in the CMPS. This allows for a comparison of two measures of linked fate on political participation across racial and ethnic groups. To test the impact of linked fate on political participation, I present several negative binomial regressions. The results show that the original measure of linked fate is a strong predictor for political participation for Latinos and Blacks but does not predict political participation for Asians. The measure for immigrant linked fate predicts political participation for Latinos and Blacks but not for Asians. The results suggest that participating in politics to represent the interests of their racial or ethnic group is very important for Latinos and Blacks. Additionally, participating in politics to represent the interests of immigrants is also strongly pronounced among Blacks and Latinos and shows a motivation for these two groups to engage in politics.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11109-023-09861-2.</p>","PeriodicalId":48166,"journal":{"name":"Political Behavior","volume":" ","pages":"1-23"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9910770/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond Racial Linked Fate: Inter-Minority Political Solidarity and Political Participation.\",\"authors\":\"Yoshira D Macías Mejía\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11109-023-09861-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study examines the various patterns of political participation among Latinos, Blacks and Asians Americans. To assess these patterns of political participation among these three groups, I employ the Collaborative Multiracial Post-election Survey (CMPS) 2016. I use two key measures: one is the original measure of linked fate and the other is immigrant linked fate, both which are available in the CMPS. This allows for a comparison of two measures of linked fate on political participation across racial and ethnic groups. To test the impact of linked fate on political participation, I present several negative binomial regressions. The results show that the original measure of linked fate is a strong predictor for political participation for Latinos and Blacks but does not predict political participation for Asians. The measure for immigrant linked fate predicts political participation for Latinos and Blacks but not for Asians. The results suggest that participating in politics to represent the interests of their racial or ethnic group is very important for Latinos and Blacks. Additionally, participating in politics to represent the interests of immigrants is also strongly pronounced among Blacks and Latinos and shows a motivation for these two groups to engage in politics.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11109-023-09861-2.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48166,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Political Behavior\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9910770/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Political Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-023-09861-2\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-023-09861-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了拉美裔、黑人和亚裔美国人的各种政治参与模式。为了评估这三个群体的政治参与模式,我采用了《2016 年多种族选举后合作调查》(CMPS)。我使用了两个关键测量指标:一个是原始的关联命运测量指标,另一个是移民关联命运测量指标,这两个指标都可以在 CMPS 中找到。这样就可以比较两种衡量联系命运对不同种族和族裔群体政治参与的影响。为了检验关联命运对政治参与的影响,我进行了几次负二项回归。结果显示,原始的关联命运衡量标准对拉美裔和黑人的政治参与有很强的预测作用,但对亚裔的政治参与没有预测作用。移民命运相连的衡量标准可以预测拉美裔和黑人的政治参与,但不能预测亚裔的政治参与。结果表明,参与政治以代表其种族或族裔群体的利益对拉美裔和黑人非常重要。此外,黑人和拉美人参与政治以代表移民利益的现象也非常明显,这也显示了这两个群体参与政治的动机:在线版本包含补充材料,可查阅 10.1007/s11109-023-09861-2。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Beyond Racial Linked Fate: Inter-Minority Political Solidarity and Political Participation.

Beyond Racial Linked Fate: Inter-Minority Political Solidarity and Political Participation.

Beyond Racial Linked Fate: Inter-Minority Political Solidarity and Political Participation.

Beyond Racial Linked Fate: Inter-Minority Political Solidarity and Political Participation.

This study examines the various patterns of political participation among Latinos, Blacks and Asians Americans. To assess these patterns of political participation among these three groups, I employ the Collaborative Multiracial Post-election Survey (CMPS) 2016. I use two key measures: one is the original measure of linked fate and the other is immigrant linked fate, both which are available in the CMPS. This allows for a comparison of two measures of linked fate on political participation across racial and ethnic groups. To test the impact of linked fate on political participation, I present several negative binomial regressions. The results show that the original measure of linked fate is a strong predictor for political participation for Latinos and Blacks but does not predict political participation for Asians. The measure for immigrant linked fate predicts political participation for Latinos and Blacks but not for Asians. The results suggest that participating in politics to represent the interests of their racial or ethnic group is very important for Latinos and Blacks. Additionally, participating in politics to represent the interests of immigrants is also strongly pronounced among Blacks and Latinos and shows a motivation for these two groups to engage in politics.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11109-023-09861-2.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Political Behavior
Political Behavior POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
5.10%
发文量
70
期刊介绍: Political Behavior publishes original research in the general fields of political behavior, institutions, processes, and policies. Approaches include economic (preference structuring, bargaining), psychological (attitude formation and change, motivations, perceptions), sociological (roles, group, class), or political (decision making, coalitions, influence). Articles focus on the political behavior (conventional or unconventional) of the individual person or small group (microanalysis), or of large organizations that participate in the political process such as parties, interest groups, political action committees, governmental agencies, and mass media (macroanalysis). As an interdisciplinary journal, Political Behavior integrates various approaches across different levels of theoretical abstraction and empirical domain (contextual analysis). Officially cited as: Polit Behav
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信