使用定性研究设计来了解南非HIV/NCD多发病患者的治疗负担和自我护理能力:一篇方法论文。

Journal of multimorbidity and comorbidity Pub Date : 2023-04-07 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1177/26335565231168041
Myrna van Pinxteren, Nonzuzo Mbokazi, Katherine Murphy, Frances S Mair, Carl May, Naomi S Levitt
{"title":"使用定性研究设计来了解南非HIV/NCD多发病患者的治疗负担和自我护理能力:一篇方法论文。","authors":"Myrna van Pinxteren,&nbsp;Nonzuzo Mbokazi,&nbsp;Katherine Murphy,&nbsp;Frances S Mair,&nbsp;Carl May,&nbsp;Naomi S Levitt","doi":"10.1177/26335565231168041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), including South Africa, are currently experiencing multiple epidemics: HIV and the rising burden of non-communicable diseases (NCDs), leading to different patterns of multimorbidity (the occurrence of two or more chronic conditions) than experienced in high income settings. These adversely affect health outcomes, increase patients' perceived burden of treatment, and impact the workload of self-management. This paper outlines the methods used in a qualitative study exploring burden of treatment among people living with HIV/NCD multimorbidity in South Africa.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We undertook a comparative qualitative study to examine the interaction between individuals' treatment burden (self-management workload) and their capacity to take on this workload, using the dual lenses of Burden of Treatment Theory (BoTT) and Cumulative Complexity Model (CuCoM) to aid conceptualisation of the data. We interviewed 30 people with multimorbidity and 16 carers in rural Eastern Cape and urban Cape Town between February-April 2021. Data was analysed through framework analysis.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>This paper discusses the methodological procedures considered when conducting qualitative research among people with multimorbidity in low-income settings in South Africa. We highlight the decisions made when developing the research design, recruiting participants, and selecting field-sites. We also explore data analysis processes and reflect on the positionality of the research project and researchers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This paper illustrates the decision-making processes conducting this qualitative research and may be helpful in informing future research aiming to qualitatively investigate treatment burden among patients in LMICs.</p>","PeriodicalId":73843,"journal":{"name":"Journal of multimorbidity and comorbidity","volume":"13 ","pages":"26335565231168041"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10088413/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using qualitative study designs to understand treatment burden and capacity for self-care among patients with HIV/NCD multimorbidity in South Africa: A methods paper.\",\"authors\":\"Myrna van Pinxteren,&nbsp;Nonzuzo Mbokazi,&nbsp;Katherine Murphy,&nbsp;Frances S Mair,&nbsp;Carl May,&nbsp;Naomi S Levitt\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/26335565231168041\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), including South Africa, are currently experiencing multiple epidemics: HIV and the rising burden of non-communicable diseases (NCDs), leading to different patterns of multimorbidity (the occurrence of two or more chronic conditions) than experienced in high income settings. These adversely affect health outcomes, increase patients' perceived burden of treatment, and impact the workload of self-management. This paper outlines the methods used in a qualitative study exploring burden of treatment among people living with HIV/NCD multimorbidity in South Africa.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We undertook a comparative qualitative study to examine the interaction between individuals' treatment burden (self-management workload) and their capacity to take on this workload, using the dual lenses of Burden of Treatment Theory (BoTT) and Cumulative Complexity Model (CuCoM) to aid conceptualisation of the data. We interviewed 30 people with multimorbidity and 16 carers in rural Eastern Cape and urban Cape Town between February-April 2021. Data was analysed through framework analysis.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>This paper discusses the methodological procedures considered when conducting qualitative research among people with multimorbidity in low-income settings in South Africa. We highlight the decisions made when developing the research design, recruiting participants, and selecting field-sites. We also explore data analysis processes and reflect on the positionality of the research project and researchers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This paper illustrates the decision-making processes conducting this qualitative research and may be helpful in informing future research aiming to qualitatively investigate treatment burden among patients in LMICs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73843,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of multimorbidity and comorbidity\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"26335565231168041\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10088413/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of multimorbidity and comorbidity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/26335565231168041\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of multimorbidity and comorbidity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26335565231168041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:包括南非在内的中低收入国家目前正在经历多种流行病:艾滋病毒和非传染性疾病负担的增加,导致了与高收入环境中不同的多发病模式(两种或多种慢性病的发生)。这些会对健康结果产生不利影响,增加患者的治疗负担,并影响自我管理的工作量。本文概述了一项定性研究中使用的方法,该研究探讨了南非HIV/NCD多发病患者的治疗负担,使用治疗负担理论(BoTT)和累积复杂性模型(CuCoM)的双重视角来帮助数据的概念化。2021年2月至4月,我们采访了东开普省农村和开普敦城市的30名多发病患者和16名护理人员。通过框架分析对数据进行了分析。研究结果:本文讨论了在南非低收入环境中对多发性疾病患者进行定性研究时所考虑的方法学程序。我们强调在开发研究设计、招募参与者和选择现场时所做的决定。我们还探索了数据分析过程,并反思了研究项目和研究人员的立场。结论:本文阐述了进行这项定性研究的决策过程,可能有助于为未来旨在定性调查LMIC患者治疗负担的研究提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using qualitative study designs to understand treatment burden and capacity for self-care among patients with HIV/NCD multimorbidity in South Africa: A methods paper.

Background: Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), including South Africa, are currently experiencing multiple epidemics: HIV and the rising burden of non-communicable diseases (NCDs), leading to different patterns of multimorbidity (the occurrence of two or more chronic conditions) than experienced in high income settings. These adversely affect health outcomes, increase patients' perceived burden of treatment, and impact the workload of self-management. This paper outlines the methods used in a qualitative study exploring burden of treatment among people living with HIV/NCD multimorbidity in South Africa.

Methods: We undertook a comparative qualitative study to examine the interaction between individuals' treatment burden (self-management workload) and their capacity to take on this workload, using the dual lenses of Burden of Treatment Theory (BoTT) and Cumulative Complexity Model (CuCoM) to aid conceptualisation of the data. We interviewed 30 people with multimorbidity and 16 carers in rural Eastern Cape and urban Cape Town between February-April 2021. Data was analysed through framework analysis.

Findings: This paper discusses the methodological procedures considered when conducting qualitative research among people with multimorbidity in low-income settings in South Africa. We highlight the decisions made when developing the research design, recruiting participants, and selecting field-sites. We also explore data analysis processes and reflect on the positionality of the research project and researchers.

Conclusion: This paper illustrates the decision-making processes conducting this qualitative research and may be helpful in informing future research aiming to qualitatively investigate treatment burden among patients in LMICs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信